Majesty of Reason Philosophy Podcast cover image

Majesty of Reason Philosophy Podcast

Latest episodes

undefined
Sep 28, 2022 • 1h 16min

12 Design Arguments: An Analysis | (MoR No. 93)

From the complexity of the biological world to the fine-tuning of the universe, design arguments are among the most powerful arguments for God's existence. In this video, I assess 12 such arguments. Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josep... NOTES (1) There are several responses to fine-tuning arguments (FTAs) that I didn't mention in the video. The reason is because I simply haven't researched them in enough depth to have a strong view on them. For instance: (a) some philosophers mount the multiverse hypothesis in response to FTAs; (b) some philosophers and scientists question whether there even is fine-tuning; (c) some philosophers and scientists argue that FTAs suffer from the problem of non-normalizable probability measures; and (d) some philosophers and scientists argue that FTAs suffer from the the problem of old evidence. I haven't adequately researched these to have views on them. (My research focus lies more in cosmological and ontological arguments -- sorry!) (2) Philip Goff has recently argued (in Scientific American and Capturing Christianity) that the multiverse objection to the FTA commits the inverse gamblers fallacy. I don't think this is correct for several of the reasons spelled out in philosopher Neil Manson's recent Philosophy Compass article on the multiverse, FTA, and the inverse gambler's fallacy [here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KWsP... ]. James Fodor also discusses Goff's criticism in a recent video [here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQxCZ... ]. More generally, I highly recommend Neil Manson's work criticizing the FTA. You can find his papers at https://philpeople.org/profiles/neil-... (3) I don't think the objection to FTAs appealing simply to the observation selection effect works. This is why I didn't discuss this objection in the video. (4) A perceptive viewer of my original video raised an objection (in personal correspondence) to my/Manson's criticism of FTAs concerning the near-infinitude of ways God could actualize the good of conscious, moral beings without a finely
undefined
Sep 28, 2022 • 1h 44min

What is Fundamental with Dr. Paul Draper & Dr. Josh Rasmussen | (MoR No. 92)

Is anything fundamental? If so, what is fundamental reality like? Is it necessary? Conscious? Perfect? I'm joined by Paul Draper and Josh Rasmussen to discuss these questions and more. Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josep... LINKS My website: https://josephschmid.com  My PhilPeople profile: https://philpeople.org/profiles/josep...
undefined
Sep 28, 2022 • 4h 37min

10k AMA Answers! | (MoR No. 91)

You asked hundreds of questions, and I answered!   Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josep... LINKS Preface to my forthcoming Springer book: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K...  My 3k AMA Answers video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0QRt... My website: https://www.josephschmid.com  My PhilPapers Profile: https://philpeople.org/profiles/josep...
undefined
Sep 15, 2022 • 1h 26min

11 Ontological Arguments: An Analysis | (MoR No. 89)

From Anselm to Descartes to Pruss and Nagasawa, ontological arguments have captivated philosophers and laity alike. In this video, I analyze eleven such arguments for God's existence. Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josep... RESOURCES 100+ Argument Resource Document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q... LINKS My website: https://josephschmid.com My PhilPeople profile: https://philpeople.org/profiles/josep...
undefined
Sep 15, 2022 • 20min

Responding to Dr. Chad McIntosh on my 12-Hour Video | (MoR No. 88)

Chad McIntosh recently criticized my 12-hour-long video as "unfair", "academically lazy", and "poor form". In this video, I explain why these allegations are mistaken -- and ironically so. Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josep... RESOURCES Over 100 Arguments for God ANSWERED: https://youtu.be/iP0Mh42jvV4 Resources for Answering 100+ Arguments for God: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q... @Furthering Christendom's video: https://youtu.be/0Dueky7E9HE LINKS My website: https://josephschmid.com My PhilPeople profile: https://philpeople.org/profiles/josep... THANKS Many thanks to Cameron Bertuzzi for helping design the thumbnail! And, as always, thanks to my patrons for their undying love and support.
undefined
Sep 15, 2022 • 1h 43min

Graham Oppy responds to Josh Rasmussen's Ontological Argument | (MoR No. 87)

Josh Rasmussen recently defended a Gödelian-style ontological argument at @Capturing Christianity's CCv1 conference. In this video, Graham Oppy joins me to respond to Josh's argument. Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josep... RESOURCES Over 100 Arguments for God ANSWERED: https://youtu.be/iP0Mh42jvV4 Oppy (2017), "The Ontological Arguments", link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1y2cb... Oppy (2019), SEP entry on Ontological Arguments: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/on... Oppy (1995), “Ontological Arguments and Belief in God”, link: https://www.amazon.com/Ontological-Ar... Oppy's (2018) edited collection, “Ontological Arguments”, link: https://www.amazon.com/Ontological-Ar... LINKS My website: https://josephschmid.com My PhilPeople profile: https://philpeople.org/profiles/josep...
undefined
Sep 15, 2022 • 2h 36min

20 Cosmological Arguments: An Analysis | (MoR No. 86)

From Aquinas to Leibniz to Pruss and Rasmussen, cosmological arguments have a long and formidable pedigree. I this video, I analyze twenty such arguments for God's existence. Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josep... RESOURCES 100+ Argument Resource Document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q... LINKS My website: https://josephschmid.com My PhilPeople profile: https://philpeople.org/profiles/josep...
undefined
Sep 15, 2022 • 46min

What has Cameron learned from @Capturing Christianity | (MoR No. 85)

In this in-person interview, I chat with Cameron Bertuzzi about five dimensions along which he's grown since starting his YouTube channel. Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josep... LINKS Cam's channel is, obviously, @Capturing Christianity My website: https://josephschmid.com My PhilPeople profile: https://philpeople.org/profiles/josep...
undefined
Sep 15, 2022 • 11h 56min

Over 100 Arguments for God ANSWERED | (MoR No. 84)

​@Capturing Christianity and Dr. Chad McIntosh created a video covering 150+ arguments for God's existence. Here's my take on the arguments. Buckle up for some juicy philosophy. Like the show? Help it grow! Consider becoming a patron (thanks!): https://www.patreon.com/majestyofreason If you wanna make a one-time donation or tip (thanks!): https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/josep... RESOURCES Every resource mentioned in the video is found in here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q... LINKS My website: https://josephschmid.com My PhilPeople profile: https://philpeople.org/profiles/josep...
undefined
Sep 15, 2022 • 1h 4min

Pantheism vs. The Kalam Cosmological Argument | (MoR No. 83)

Dive into the intriguing clash of pantheism versus the Kalam cosmological argument! Explore a thought experiment involving a glowing orb that questions our understanding of existence. Delve into the design argument, pondering the nature of God from various perspectives. The conversation spirals into rethinking causality and infinity, highlighted by Hilbert's Hotel. Reflect on how collective experiences shape identity and the essence of meaning in art versus divinity. It's a philosophical rollercoaster challenging the necessity of invoking God in reality!

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app