Astral Codex Ten Podcast

Explore the intricate challenges of homelessness, especially regarding those with mental illness. Delve into the need for actionable solutions beyond historical comparisons. Discover the effectiveness of injectable antipsychotics and the obstacles faced in administering them. Analyze the complexities of prosecuting low-level crimes and its implications for the homeless. Finally, consider compassionate strategies advocating for robust social services and balanced mental health solutions to improve lives and community safety.

Daniel Böttger, a past Book Review Contest winner, dives into the riveting relationship between subjective experiences and objective physics. He discusses how qualia challenge conventional interpretations of consciousness and questions the very essence of self-identity. The conversation delves into groundbreaking theories linking neuronal oscillations to qualia, revealing their role in consciousness. Böttger also critiques existing brain imaging methods like fMRI, while highlighting the potential of EEG advancements for deeper insights into the mind.

Dive into the chilling world of prion diseases and their eerie connections to historical events and personal tragedies. Explore the haunting tale of a Venetian family grappling with fatal familial insomnia. Uncover the clash between Western medicine and indigenous practices in Papua New Guinea, and the ethical dilemmas surrounding it. Delve into prion diseases' dark legacy, examining governmental mismanagement in the UK. Finally, learn about the troubling rise of chronic wasting disease in North America and its significant ecological and ethical implications.

Imagine being on a lifeboat with limited food and facing a life-and-death choice. The group spirals into chaos as they skip fair lots, opting to sacrifice one of their own, Bob. The dynamics of social alliances shed light on the absurdity of survival. Enter the satirical 'Backscratchers Club,' showcasing how desperation fuels strange coalitions. Additionally, the discussion dives into elite networking, exploring the complicated relationships within societal structures. It's a captivating mix of survival psychology and social commentary.

I. Suppose that you, an ordinary person, open your door and start choking on yellow smoke. You call up your representative and say "there should be less pollution". A technical expert might hear "there should be less pollution" and have dozens of questions. Do you just want to do common-sense things, like lower the detection threshold for hexamethyldecawhatever? Or do you want to ban tetraethylpentawhatever, which is vital for the baby formula food chain and would cause millions of babies to die if you banned it? Any pollution legislation must be made of specific policies. In some sense, it's impossible to be "for" or "against" the broad concept of "reducing pollution". Everyone would be against a bill that devastated the baby formula supply chain for no benefit. And everyone would support a magical bill that cleaned the skies with no extra hardship on industry. In between, there are just a million different tradeoffs; some are good, others bad. So (the technocrat concludes), it's incoherent to support "reducing pollution". You can only support (or oppose) particular plans. And yet ordinary people should be able to say "I want to stop choking on yellow smoke every time I go outside" without having to learn the difference between hexamethyldecawhatever and tetraethylpentawhatever. https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/details-that-you-should-include-in

Finalist #3 in the Book Review Contest [This is one of the finalists in the 2024 book review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done. I'll be posting about one of these a week for several months. When you've read them all, I'll ask you to vote for a favorite, so remember which ones you liked] https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/your-book-review-don-juan

The last week hasn't been great for the Democratic Party. First Biden bombed the debate. But the subsequent decision about whether/how to replace Biden has also been embarrassing. Biden has refused to step aside gracefully, and party elites don't seem to have any contingency plan. Worse, they don't even seem united on the need to figure anything out, with many deflecting the conversation to irrelevant points like "Trump is also bad" or pretending that nothing is really wrong. Some of the party's problems are hard and have no shortcuts. But the big one - figuring out whether replacing Biden would even help the Democrats' electoral chances - is a good match for prediction markets. Set up markets to find the probability of Democrats winning they nominate Biden, vs. the probability of Democrats winning if they replace him with someone else. (see my Prediction Market FAQ for why I think they are good for cases like these) Before we go into specifics, the summary result: Replacing Biden with Harris is neutral to slightly positive; replacing Biden with Newsom or a generic Democrat increases their odds of winning by 10 - 15 percentage points. There are some potential technical objections to this claim, but they mostly suggest reasons why the markets might overestimate Biden's chances rather than underestimate them. https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/prediction-markets-suggest-replacing

Guest Matthew Scully, a conservative Christian and former speechwriter for George W. Bush, discusses animal welfare in his book 'Dominion'. They touch on ethical treatment of animals, exploring consciousness and sentience, debating animal pain, emotions, protection efforts, and controversies.

President Biden and former President Trump engage in a fictional 2024 Presidential debate where Biden questions the existence of states, leading to philosophical discussions. Topics include abortion rights, wokeness, cancel culture, misinformation, conspiracy theories, and immigration policies with a humorous and absurd twist.

Discusses the concept of fake traditions and transforming them into valuable aesthetics and rituals. Explores the idea of secular weekly meetings as a replacement for religious traditions. Evaluates the success of 2010s New Atheist attempts to reinvent 'church, but secular'.