Boom! Lawyered

The podcast discusses the upcoming Supreme Court oral arguments on abortion laws, focusing on the impact on ER doctors. They explore fetal personhood in relation to abortion rights and the challenges faced by doctors in states with medical treatment restrictions. The hosts also mention utilizing social media for engagement during the discussions.

Justice correspondent Elie Mystal joins the podcast to discuss the Supreme Court justices, highlighting Alito's disdain for women, Barrett's stance on abortion, and dismissing calls for Sotomayor to retire. They cover judicial behavior, Supreme Court reform, conscience protection in abortion cases, and the urgency to repeal the Comstock Act.

The podcast discusses the recent Florida Supreme Court decisions removing abortion rights from the state constitution, the implications of a 15-week ban, upcoming voter initiatives to protect abortion access, and the influence of DeSantis-appointed judges on reproductive rights.

Legal professional Erin Hawley discusses Mifepristone's day at the Supreme Court, highlighting surprising insights and reactions. Hosts delve into the intense courtroom arguments and explore the complexities of ultrasounds in medication abortion. They also analyze federal conscience protections and patient care perspectives, shedding light on the evolving landscape of abortion rights and access.

Exploring the high-stakes abortion pill case at the Supreme Court, highlighting the potential impact on medication abortion access and the resurrection of the Comstock Act. Scrutinizing biased scientific studies on abortion reversal, discussing legal standings in the lawsuit, and addressing frustration with the legal system.

The podcast discusses the Fifth Circuit Court's ruling on teens' access to birth control without parental consent, potentially jeopardizing Title X. It highlights the clash between federal law and Texas's parental consent law, sparking concerns among advocates about restricting teens' reproductive health choices.

The next major Supreme Court fight over nationwide abortion access since the overturn of Roe v. Wade is coming up. Oral arguments in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, regarding mifepristone access, one of two drugs used in medication abortion, is set for March 26, and the justices could potentially set access back decades.In this flashback episode, Jess and Imani discuss how anti-choice activists are using scare tactics—and language like “chemical abortion”—to stigmatize mifepristone. Decades of research and data show mifepristone is safe and effective.Rewire News Groupis a nonprofit media organization, which means Boom! Lawyered is only made possible with the support of listeners like you! If you can, please join our team by donating here.And sign up forThe Fallout, a weekly newsletter written by Jess that’s exclusively dedicated to covering every aspect of this unprecedented moment.

Catch up with stories you may have missed at rewirenewsgroup.com.Rewire News Groupis a nonprofit media organization, which means Boom! Lawyered is only made possible with the support of listeners like you! If you can, please join our team by donating here.And sign up forThe Fallout, a weekly newsletter written by Jess that’s exclusively dedicated to covering every aspect of this unprecedented moment.

Junk science is everywhere surrounding the big medication abortion case the Supreme Court will hear in late March, FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine. The junk science is so improper, in fact, that the academic publishers who published studies that were cited by the plaintiffs—and the lower court judge who ruled on it, Matthew Kacsmaryk—retracted them.As Imani says in this week's episode, the Supreme Court may very well rely on a bunch of bozos when it decides to maintain the restrictions on access to abortion that were imposed by Kacsmaryk and the Fifth Circuit. So if the evidence upon which that decision was based is garbage, the Court should rule in favor of the FDA. Right?Rewire News Group is a nonprofit media organization, which means Boom! Lawyered is only made possible with the support of listeners like you! If you can, please join our team by donating here.And sign up for The Fallout, a weekly newsletter written by Jess that’s exclusively dedicated to covering every aspect of this unprecedented moment.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a ruling this week regarding abortion, and there's been some confusion around it. No, the court didn't find a fundamental right to abortion in the state constitution. However, the justices did pave the way for that possibility as they weighed whether Medicaid must cover abortions in Pennsylvania.Rewire News Group is a nonprofit media organization, which means Boom! Lawyered is only made possible with the support of listeners like you! If you can, please join our team by donating here.And sign up for The Fallout, a weekly newsletter written by Jess that’s exclusively dedicated to covering every aspect of this unprecedented moment.