In this podcast, Jess and Imani discuss Idaho's controversial abortion trafficking statute, which criminalizes actions related to minors seeking abortions out of state. They delve into the legal complexities, challenges in abortion access in Idaho, and the importance of adult support networks for teenagers seeking abortion care. The episode explores legal strategies and civil disobedience in response to abortion bans, highlighting the impact on reproductive healthcare rights.
Idaho's abortion trafficking law criminalizes aiding minors seeking abortions, targeting recruiters and transporters.
The law in Idaho poses a threat to reproductive rights by restricting aid provision, potentially setting broader healthcare limitations.
Deep dives
The Fight Against Idaho's Abortion Restriction Laws
Idaho's abortion legislation targets those aiding minors seeking abortions, criminalizing activities like recruiting and transporting. This law imposes two to five years imprisonment for violations, even allowing the state AG to prosecute if local officials refuse. The case, Matsumoto v. Labrador, challenges Idaho's stringent abortion trafficking statute, impacting organizations like Northwest Abortion Access Fund and Indigenous Idaho Alliance.
First Amendment Rights and Reproductive Health Care
The lawsuit against Idaho's law argues First Amendment infringement as it restricts individuals from providing essential abortion-related aid. Plaintiffs claim the State's statute violates their right to speak about and engage in abortion discussions. Also, the law threatens Fourth Amendment liberties by interfering with life decisions and freedom from intrusive legislation.
Implications Beyond Abortion: Erosion of Rights and Protections
Idaho's legislation extends beyond abortions to restrict access to healthcare for minors. By targeting aid providers, it undermines Supreme Court precedents granting minors the right to consent to reproductive healthcare. The law's broad reach poses a threat to other aspects of reproductive rights, potentially setting precedents for broader limitations on healthcare access for vulnerable populations.
Now that the state has made its argument that people who visit emergency rooms at Medicare-funded hospitals needing an abortion can go pound sand, it's arguing before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that anyone who “recruits, harbors, or transports” a minor within Idaho for the purposes of “procuring an abortion” out of state can be criminalized as an abortion trafficker.
As Jess says, Matsumoto v. Labrador isn't about "abortion trafficking"—whatever that means—it's about criminalizing direct aid to folks who need abortions and forcing parental involvement in minors' reproductive health-care decisions despite contrary Supreme Court precedent.
Rewire News Group is a nonprofit media organization, which means that episodes like this one is only made possible with the support of listeners like you! If you can, please join our team by donating here.
And sign up for The Fallout, a weekly newsletter written by Jess that’s exclusively dedicated to covering every aspect of this unprecedented moment.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode