
Serious Inquiries Only
Join Thomas for some critical thinking on questions of science, philosophy, skepticism and politics. These serious topics are discussed with some serious guests, but in an entertaining and engaging way! This is not your typical interview podcast; it’s a friendly dialogue, conducted thoughtfully and with plenty of humor. It's Serious Inquiries Only; but like, not boring or anything.
Latest episodes

Oct 31, 2024 • 50min
SIO463: Synesthesia - How Does It Work?
Dr. Janessa Seymour is back! This time she teaches us all about synesthesia. How does it work? How many people have it? Are they just faking it? How do we test for it? This episode features one of the most mind-blowing things I've ever heard on this show. I really enjoyed this one! Are you an expert in something and want to be on the show? Apply here! Please please pretty please support the show on patreon! You get ad free episodes, early episodes, and other bonus content!

Oct 31, 2024 • 1h 2min
SIO462: The Day the Dinos Died
Join Dr. Eric Jaffe, a biology expert and dinosaur aficionado, as he uncovers the dramatic details of the dinosaurs' demise. He reveals the cataclysmic meteor impact that triggered their extinction and explores how life adapted and survived afterward. Delve into the patterns of past mass extinctions and their implications for modern biodiversity. Dr. Jaffe also highlights the fascinating connection between ancient ecosystems and present-day fossil fuels, illustrating the ever-evolving story of life on Earth.

6 snips
Oct 1, 2024 • 1h 1min
SIO461: So You Want To Destroy the Earth...
Astrophysicist Dr. Bryan Gillis returns to craft wild, hypothetical ways to obliterate our planet. From halting the moon's orbit to launching nuclear weapons, he discusses the complex physics behind these catastrophic ideas. They dive into the hilarity of a moonfall scenario, juxtaposed with serious reflections on humanity’s fragile future. The conversation also highlights the dangers of AI and cosmic threats, all wrapped in a playful, light-hearted banter that blends science with absurdity.

Sep 20, 2024 • 53min
SIO460: Actual Experts Debunk the Cass Review
In 2020, the United Kingdom’s (NHS) commissioned an inquiry to provide recommendations for the healthcare of transgender adolescents. It was overseen by a pediatrician named Dr. Hillary Cass and was completed in April 2024. It became known as the Cass Review, and it has since been used to justify depriving a lot of people of the healthcare they badly need. But is it good science? Obviously not. Yale's Integrity Project gathered several actual experts in the field to conduct their own review of the review. The results are not pretty. They published an excellent report entitled "An Evidence-Based Critique of “The Cass Review” on Gender-affirming Care for Adolescent Gender Dysphoria." Three of these experts, Drs. Meredithe McNamara, Kellan Baker, and Ken C. Pang, were kind enough to join us to talk about their findings. It looks to me like the anti-trans side is winning this information war, so please share this far and wide to get the word out! Are you an expert in something and want to be on the show? Apply here! Please please pretty please support the show on patreon! You get ad free episodes, early episodes, and other bonus content!

Sep 13, 2024 • 54min
SIO459: Understanding CRISPR with Dr. Eric Jaffe
Dr. Eric Jaffe, an expert in CRISPR technology, unpacks the fascinating world of genetic editing. He discusses the historical evolution of CRISPR and how it functions in bacterial immunity. The conversation explores groundbreaking applications in areas like spina bifida research and the controversial use of CRISPR to control mosquito populations. Ethical concerns and potential ecological impacts are examined, offering listeners a thorough understanding of both the promise and perils of this revolutionary technology.

Sep 11, 2024 • 51min
SIO458: How Eye Color Reveals the Complexity of Genetics
Dr. Eric Jaffe, a genetics expert and CRISPR innovator, returns to discuss the fascinating intricacies of genetics. He dives into how eye color illustrates genetic complexity and why mapping the human genome hasn't led to instant modifications. The conversation explores the relationship between genes and physical traits, emphasizing the role of multiple genes in determining characteristics. Jaffe also explains genetic mutations, the gene expression journey, and sets the stage for the promise of CRISPR technology in reshaping genetic understanding.

Sep 1, 2024 • 39min
SIO457: Facilitated Communication is Fake, with Kelly Burke
Kelly Burke joins the pod again, this time to break down Facilitated Communication. A documentary recently came out on Netflix that explored this, and Kelly tells us why it's not just nonsense but also harmful, and how she and other experts in this field actually help people learn real communication techniques. Are you an expert in something and want to be on the show? Apply here!

Aug 30, 2024 • 49min
SIO456: Are You a Good Drug or a Bad Drug?
Part 2! Dr. Jenessa Seymour continues to walk us through our drug journey with a brief stop to cover why it's impossible to get ADHD medication. PSA: Narcan is over the counter and (last we checked) less than $50 for two doses. Please consider buying some to have on hand so you can help save a life. Are you an expert in something and want to be on the show? Apply here!

Aug 29, 2024 • 55min
SIO455: This Is Your Brain on Drugs, With Dr. Jenessa Seymour
Dr. Jenessa Seymour, an expert in addiction and drug policy, dives into the science of how drugs affect the brain and what addiction really means. She critiques current drug policies and highlights the challenges surrounding opioid and fentanyl use. Their discussion emphasizes the distinction between chemical dependency and substance use disorder. Jenessa also underscores the importance of harm reduction strategies and the alarming rise of fentanyl, urging for a more evidence-based approach to drug education.

Aug 10, 2024 • 1h 21min
SIO454: Bret Weinstein's Incredibly Curious PhD Thesis
In a deep dive into Bret Weinstein's PhD thesis, the discussion unpacks the relevance and implications of his claims about vaccines and COVID-19. The critique highlights a troubling lack of scientific rigor and empirical evidence, questioning academic standards. It emphasizes the need for solid data in the study of aging, telomeres, and biological trade-offs. As the speakers dissect anecdotal reasoning versus substantiated research, they call for higher standards in academic discourse to combat misinformation.