5-4

This week, Sam Bagenstos, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School, dives into the groundbreaking Janus v. AFSCME ruling. He discusses how this case restricts unions' ability to collect fees and its implications for worker rights and funding. The conversation critiques the intertwining of union activities with First Amendment rights and explores the political dynamics that influence labor laws. Bagenstos also highlights the electoral effects of right-to-work laws and how unions are strategizing to stay powerful amidst these challenges.

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) examine the doctrine of qualified immunity, which protects police and other officials from being sued for civil rights and other abuses. Please support our sponsors:  Raycon -- buyraycon.com/fivefourHelix -- helixsleep.com/fivefour Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

On this week’s episode of 5-4, Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) discuss a decision that limited damages in the case of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, one of the worst environmental disasters in US history. The ruling also capped damages that can be sought in all maritime law cases. Please support our sponsor: Raycon -- buyraycon.com/fivefour Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

On this week’s bonus episode of 5-4, Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) talk about the Court’s surprise decision affirming that the Civil Rights Act prevents employers from discriminating against people on the basis of their gender identity or sexual orientation. The hosts pay special attention to Justice Alito’s special dissent.   Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.Advertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brands

Steven Vladeck, a noted legal expert who represented a victim's family before the Supreme Court, joins the discussion. The podcast delves into the chilling case of a Border Patrol agent who shot a teenager across the U.S.-Mexico border. Key topics include systemic abuse of power, challenges of holding federal agents accountable, and the intersections of racial inequality and policing. The conversation critiques the Supreme Court's approach to crucial constitutional questions, highlighting the ongoing struggle for justice in such complex cases.

Dive into the landmark Supreme Court case Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, where corporations can claim religious exemptions. The ruling raises questions about women's reproductive rights and the implications for healthcare access. Explore the tension between corporate religious beliefs and employee rights, and the ethical dilemmas surrounding the Museum of the Bible’s artifact collection. Examine the strategic motivations behind Supreme Court opinion assignments and the balance of power between wealthy employers and their employees.

Dive into the chilling legacy of a 1927 Supreme Court case that legalized forced sterilization in America. The discussion unveils the troubling ties between eugenics and early 20th-century elitism, revealing systemic discrimination against disabled individuals. Explore the dark history of the eugenics movement, the flawed pseudoscience behind it, and its ongoing repercussions today. The hosts also examine how past injustices still permeate the legal system and the pressing need for reform to address reproductive and disability rights.

Delve into the complexities of felony murder through a haunting 1987 Supreme Court case, highlighting the moral dilemmas of justice and accountability. Discover the dramatic prison escape of the Tyson brothers and the chaos that ensued, questioning the fairness of charging those without intent to kill. Explore the nuances of depraved heart murder versus intent, and critique the arbitrary nature of felony murder laws, especially regarding the death penalty for young defendants. This thought-provoking discussion challenges deep-rooted assumptions within the justice system.

Delve into the profound implications of a landmark Supreme Court case challenging NSA surveillance on Americans. The discussion navigates the murky waters of legal standing, emphasizing the obstacles individuals face when claiming harm. Hear critiques on the lack of transparency in governmental oversight and historical context behind the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The complexities of seeking justice in an age of pervasive surveillance are laid bare, shedding light on the disconnect between legal interpretations and real-world impacts.

The discussion dives into the potential shifts in the Supreme Court if Biden wins, emphasizing the pressures of his nominations amidst a push for progressive change. The hosts explore the impact of conservative ideologies and the importance of representation, particularly regarding a pledge to nominate a Black woman. They also highlight the often-overlooked role of lower courts and the Federalist Society's influence on judicial appointments. The conversation underscores the stakes for progressive initiatives and the challenges of centrist policies in a polarized landscape.