

Janus v. AFSCME
Jun 30, 2020
This week, Sam Bagenstos, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School, dives into the groundbreaking Janus v. AFSCME ruling. He discusses how this case restricts unions' ability to collect fees and its implications for worker rights and funding. The conversation critiques the intertwining of union activities with First Amendment rights and explores the political dynamics that influence labor laws. Bagenstos also highlights the electoral effects of right-to-work laws and how unions are strategizing to stay powerful amidst these challenges.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Intro
00:00 • 1min
The Janus Case: Unraveling Union Power
01:30 • 11min
Examining Union Fees and First Amendment Rights
12:22 • 3min
The Constitutionality of Forced Payment and Political Speech
15:09 • 2min
Unions, Politics, and Power Dynamics
16:55 • 16min
The Electoral Impact of Right to Work Laws
32:25 • 2min
Impact of Janus v. AFSCME on Labor Unions
34:41 • 5min
Union Dynamics and Political Funding Pressures
40:11 • 3min