

Political Theory 101
Political Theory 101
A podcast about political theory. Freely available to all, but we'd love your support on Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/politicaltheory101
Also available on iTunes, Spotify, and Google Play
https://www.patreon.com/politicaltheory101
Also available on iTunes, Spotify, and Google Play
Episodes
Mentioned books

Dec 3, 2020 • 1h 26min
Hobbes, Hume, Spinoza, and the Politics of Human Nature
Exploring the political thought of Hobbes, Hume, and Spinoza and their views on human nature's influence on politics. Solutions for compliance in society proposed by Hobbes and Hume. The role of the state in addressing self-interest. Metaphysical and epistemological views of Spinoza, Hobbes, and Hume. The relationship between is and ought in moral philosophy. Dualism and tensions in political theory.

Nov 22, 2020 • 1h 29min
The Frankfurt School and the Rise of the Interventionist State
Edmund and Benjamin delve into Marxist reactions to the rise of the interventionist state, both in the interwar and postwar periods. Featuring Adorno, Fraenkel, Habermas, Horkheimer, Kirchheimer, Marcuse, Pollock, Neumann

4 snips
Nov 5, 2020 • 1h 27min
Marxism After Marx
Edmund and Benjamin discuss the trajectory of Marxism during the decades following Marx's death. They focus on the limitations of both democratic and revolutionary approaches, attempts to find a golden mean between the two, and why this mean was so elusive.

Oct 20, 2020 • 1h 27min
Nietzsche, Arendt, and Aesthetic Struggle
Edmund and Benjamin discuss what happens when political theorists make struggling their primary objective, comparing Nietzsche and Arendt to the theorists who prioritise unity, order, or truth.

Sep 27, 2020 • 1h 59min
Marx and Materialism
Edmund and Benjamin discuss Marx's theory of history, positioning Marx in relation to his German predecessors and to some of the Marxists that follow him. The Greeks make an appearance, too.

Sep 14, 2020 • 1h 18min
Hegel and the German Conception of Freedom
Edmund and Benjamin discuss Hegel's effort to bridge the gap between the individual and the collective with mediating institutions. They position Hegel in relation to the German theorists who came before and after him and discuss his critique of the Greeks.

Aug 27, 2020 • 1h 27min
Kant, Fichte, and the Liberal Origins of Nationalism
Edmund and Benjamin discuss Kant's autonomy-heavy moral theory, emphasising Kant's reluctance to apply his moral theory to politics. This, however, did not stop Fichte, who called for a "self-sufficient" German nation-state. By shifting the autonomous subject from the individual person to the individual nation, Fichte is able to turn Kant's liberal moral theory into a nationalist political theory. Featuring Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Schmitt

Aug 1, 2020 • 1h 42min
Machiavelli, Smith, and the Separation of Politics and Morality
To escape the subordination of politics to theology under the church, Machiavelli creates a new kind of strictly political normativity, leaving morality behind. We examine why Machiavelli had to do this, and how this leads to new liberal moral theories, like the one Adam Smith describes in his Theory of Moral Sentiments. Featuring Augustine, Dante, and Kant

Jul 6, 2020 • 1h 19min
Hirschman, Goodin, and the End of the Chronic Legitimacy Crisis
Edmund and Benjamin combine the last two episodes together to talk about "chronic legitimacy crises". They discuss how these crises work and how they end--through solving, settling, and sinking.

Jun 19, 2020 • 1h 13min
Williams, Rawls, and Legitimation Stories
The discussion kicks off with a clash between Bernard Williams and John Rawls on legitimacy's nature. It dives into how states craft legitimation stories amidst rising complexities in justice. The podcast scrutinizes the illusion of political equality and highlights the perils of voter suppression. It emphasizes the critical balance between input and output legitimacy, linking economic inequalities to political power. Finally, it explores the philosophical dance between freedom and tyranny, advocating for moderation in political discourse.