Develpreneur: Become a Better Developer and Entrepreneur

Building better foundations isn't about chasing the newest framework, tool, or trend. Instead, it's about reinforcing the fundamentals that consistently support good software, healthy teams, and sustainable businesses. This episode closes out the Building Better Foundations series by stepping back and asking a practical question: are we still doing the things that matter most? Foundations rarely feel urgent. Because they're repetitive and often invisible, they're easy to deprioritize when deadlines tighten. However, when quality drops, focus slips, or growth stalls, the root cause is almost always the same—the foundations weren't maintained. Why Building Better Foundations Start With "Why" At the core of every strong foundation is clarity. Why does this work matter? Why does this business exist? Why are you building this product at all? Without clear answers, priorities blur and effort becomes reactive. As a result, teams stay busy without making meaningful progress. Re-centering on purpose provides a filter for decisions, helping teams choose what not to do just as much as what to pursue. The same principle applies to software and business. When purpose is clear, design decisions improve, roadmaps stabilize, and trade-offs become easier to justify. Building Better Foundations and Process Before Tools Tools are tempting—especially automation and AI. However, tools don't fix broken processes; they amplify them. If the underlying workflow is unclear or inefficient, adding technology only creates faster chaos. For that reason, building better foundations requires understanding the process first and then deciding where tools truly add value. This approach helps teams avoid constant tool churn and keeps attention focused on outcomes rather than novelty. Process Before Automation Clarify and stabilize workflows before introducing AI or automation Automating broken processes increases complexity, not productivity Building Better Foundations in Daily Developer Work Foundations show up in everyday habits. For example, designing before coding, writing meaningful comments, and committing code with intent all contribute to long-term stability. Although these practices may feel optional under pressure, they're what make systems maintainable and resilient. Skipping them might save minutes today, but it usually costs hours later. Over time, consistency in these habits separates fragile codebases from durable ones. Building Better Foundations for Business Growth For independent developers, consultants, and leaders, building better foundations also means working on the business—not just in it. While billable work feels productive, it doesn't scale by itself. Sustainable growth requires time spent on branding, marketing, process improvement, and planning. Although this work is often non-billable, it directly supports future stability. Working On vs. In the Business Non-billable work creates long-term opportunity Small, consistent investments compound over time Building Better Foundations and Focused Execution Distraction is one of the biggest threats to strong foundations. New ideas, side projects, and constant context switching quietly erode momentum. Focused execution means regularly checking whether current work aligns with real priorities. Short work cycles, clear goals, and intentional pauses help prevent drift and keep effort aligned. Foundation Checkpoint Are today's tasks aligned with your core goals? What can be deferred, simplified, or removed? Using AI to Strengthen Building Better Foundations AI can be a powerful accelerator when used intentionally. In practice, the most effective use cases target repetitive, low-value work and free up time for higher-impact thinking. Used thoughtfully, AI reinforces better foundations by supporting focus and experimentation. On the other hand, used carelessly, it becomes just another source of noise. Resetting Your Year With Building Better Foundations As this series wraps up, the takeaway is straightforward: revisit your foundations. Write down your goals. Clarify your priorities. Then build a roadmap and commit to it. Ultimately, building better foundations isn't a one-time effort. It's an ongoing discipline that enables growth, resilience, and adaptability. If you want better outcomes this year, start by strengthening what everything else depends on. Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Finding A Mentor – Creating a Solid Foundation Strong Foundations Start with Strong Requirements Building And Reinforcing Your Foundational Skills Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content

If you're building software in the AI era, speed is everywhere—and that's exactly why discipline matters more than ever. In Part 2 of our interview with Angelo Zanetti, one strategy keeps coming up as the smartest path for founders and product teams: go web first. You validate demand faster, avoid app-store friction, and you get a clearer signal before you spend real money on the mobile "tax." About Angelo Zanetti Angelo Zanetti is the co-founder and CEO of Elemental, a South African-based software development agency helping startups and scaleups worldwide bring digital products to life. Since 2005, his team has specialized in building scalable, high-performance web apps and software platforms that solve complex business problems. With deep technical knowledge and strategic thinking, Angelo has helped founders launch bespoke software products that are lean, user-focused, and future-ready. He's served on boards including BISA and Entrepreneurs' Organisation Cape Town, and he's a proud member of the global founder community OPUS. Go web first in the AI era AI is changing how teams build, but it doesn't change what makes a product succeed. Angelo's take is balanced: AI can absolutely make developers faster—but it can also make mistakes bigger if you don't have the experience to catch what's wrong. He shares a story that captures the risk perfectly: a developer using Cursor accidentally had the database dropped and recreated. The tool didn't intend harm—it simply took a destructive shortcut with confidence. Go web first and use AI like an amplifier. In the hands of an experienced developer, AI accelerates delivery. In the hands of someone guessing, it accelerates failure. Go web first when you're still validating demand If the goal is traction, the fastest route is often not a mobile app. Angelo points out that mobile adds overhead: submissions take time, changes can slow down release cycles, and testing requires compiles plus device/emulator workflows that can drag early iterations. When you go web first, you can ship faster, adjust faster, and learn faster. That matters when you're still figuring out what users actually value. Avoid app-store friction App stores introduce delays and rules. Even when you do everything right, you're waiting on review cycles and dealing with policies that can change. By starting on the web, you keep your feedback loop tight and your roadmap in your control. Shorten the feedback loop This is the hidden advantage: going web first makes iteration feel like steering instead of guessing. You can test onboarding, pricing pages, feature positioning, and workflows in days—not weeks—then respond to what real users do, not what you hope they do. Go web first, but use AI safely AI doesn't remove the need for senior judgment. Angelo's point is that experienced developers still matter because the hard part is translation—turning vision into structure, edge cases, and maintainable architecture. AI can accelerate progress—go web first with guardrails Go web first and set guardrails early: backups, version control, review practices, and clear boundaries for what AI can touch. Tools can generate code quickly, but your team still owns security, data safety, and reliability. Mistakes are cheaper to fix When you're validating, mistakes are inevitable. The goal is to make them inexpensive. A web-first approach keeps the cost of change lower, so you don't "lock in" bad assumptions behind a costly mobile release cycle. Go web first by planning like an architect Angelo uses a metaphor that founders immediately get: building software is like building a house—you don't start by putting up walls. You start with an architect. Planning is a real deliverable: scope, user journeys, exceptions, and specifications. It's often undervalued because it's not as tangible as code, but Angelo calls it key to success—especially if you want to scale later without rebuilding from scratch. Start with a clear scope and user journeys Go web first with a simple, documented path: who the user is, what outcome they want, and what steps they take. When the journey is clear, the MVP stays focused—and your team can defend scope when feature requests start creeping in. Define a foundation you can scale You don't need to over-engineer. But you do need a foundation that won't collapse if adoption spikes. A web-first product can still be built with smart architecture that supports growth—without pretending you already have millions of users. Go web first, then go mobile when users pull you there Angelo shares a practical signal for mobile timing: when people keep asking for it—repeatedly—through engagement, social channels, and real usage patterns, the decision becomes obvious. That's when "it makes sense," not when it's a personal preference. When mobile adds real value If the web product is solving the problem and users are happy, mobile isn't automatically better. Go web first until mobile improves retention, engagement, or access in a way the web can't. When hardware features make going mobile necessary Mobile becomes the right answer when you truly need what mobile devices offer—hardware-level capabilities that a web app can't reliably provide. Closing: Go web first, then expand with confidence Part 2 is a reminder that modern tools don't replace fundamentals—they raise the stakes. Use AI to accelerate, but respect planning and safety. And when you're still proving demand, go web first. You'll learn faster, waste less, and you'll earn your way into mobile when the market makes the call. Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Why Build A Mobile Application? Defining An MVP Properly for Your Goals How to Build a Minimal Viable Product Without Blowing Your Budget Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content

If you're building a new app or software product, your biggest risk usually isn't "bad code." It's building the wrong thing, shipping it with a shaky first impression, and then wondering why growth never shows up. In this episode of Building Better Developers, Angelo Zanetti breaks it down into a simple founder goal: prove your MVP—prove the problem is real, prove the solution is worth paying for, and prove you can deliver value without burning your runway. About Angelo Zanetti Angelo Zanetti is the co-founder and CEO of Elemental, a South African-based software development agency helping startups and scaleups worldwide bring digital products to life. Since 2005, his team has specialized in building scalable, high-performance web apps and software platforms. Angelo blends deep technical knowledge with strategic thinking, helping founders launch bespoke products that are lean, user-focused, and built for long-term value. He's also served on several boards (including BISA and Entrepreneurs' Organisation Cape Town) and is a proud member of the global founder community OPUS. Prove your MVP by solving a real problem Angelo's first checkpoint is direct: product-market fit is about whether you're solving a real pain—or building for a problem that "doesn't really exist." That's the trap founders fall into when the plan is "we'll launch, and the floodgates will open." In reality, traction comes from specificity: a specific user, a specific workflow, and a specific outcome that's better than the alternatives. If you can't describe your user's pain in one sentence, you're not ready to build features—you're ready to refine the problem. Keeping it simple To prove your MVP, you need a version you can ship and learn from. Angelo's advice: keep it MVP—keep it simple—make launch as easy as possible. This is where founders accidentally turn "minimal" into "massive." They stack features, add edge cases, and delay learning. A better approach is to ship the smallest version that delivers one clear win. A practical filter: Does this feature directly help the user get the promised result? Will we learn something important by shipping it now? If we cut it, can the product still succeed? Prove your MVP with a clean, bug-free first impression One of Angelo's strongest warnings: don't treat users like beta testers. He's not a fan of launching "full of bugs" and fixing things live, because you only get one chance at a strong first impression. That matters even more early on, when your users are deciding whether to trust you with their time, money, or data. Bugs don't just hurt quality—they kill momentum. A messy first experience can "blow your chances" to wow users. Market before development This is the founder's lesson that never feels "technical," but decides everything: marketing starts before you build. Angelo calls out the pattern he's seen repeatedly—founders who plan customer acquisition do well, and those who assume "launch to the world" will magically work usually don't. Marketing early doesn't mean ads on day one. It means clarity: Who is this for? Where do they hang out? What promise makes them lean in? What proof would make them try it? Prove your MVP safely in the AI era AI tools can help you move faster—but they can also help you move faster into danger. Angelo raises a big concern: "vibe-coded" apps can become a playground for hackers, where API keys get exposed, and security gaps get exploited—especially when a non-technical founder doesn't know what to look for. He also frames planning with a great metaphor: building software is like building a house—you start with an architect. Scoping, specifications, and user journeys are often undervalued because they're not "tangible," but they're key to long-term success and scaling. Speed is great. But speed without planning and security is how you "prove" the wrong thing—painfully. Closing thoughts If you want to prove your MVP, don't chase perfection—and don't chase feature bloat either. Solve a real problem, keep it minimal, launch with quality, and start marketing earlier than feels comfortable. That's how you get real traction, real feedback, and a real foundation to scale. Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Defining An MVP Properly for Your Goals Solving Problems in Software Projects How to Build a Minimal Viable Product Without Blowing Your Budget Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content

Tiered pricing is becoming the simplest way to sell AI-powered SaaS without turning your pricing page into a technical explanation. In my interview with Dan Balcauski, founder and Chief Pricing Officer at Product Tranquility, we talked about why AI is forcing new pricing decisions earlier than ever—and why "good, better, best" packaging often works because it keeps buying decisions clear while helping companies manage real AI costs. The AI era is making pricing margin-aware again. Tiered pricing helps you protect margins without forcing buyers to learn your cost structure. About Dan Balcauski Dan Balcauski is the founder and Chief Pricing Officer at Product Tranquility, where he helps high-volume B2B SaaS CEOs define pricing and packaging for new products. He is a TopTal certified Top 3% Product Management Professional and helps teach Kellogg Executive Education course on Product Strategy. Over the last 15 years, Dan has managed products across the full lifecycle—from concept incubation to launch, platform transitions, maintenance, and end of life—across consumer and B2B companies ranging from startups to publicly traded enterprises. He previously served as Head of Product at LawnStarter and was a Principal Product Strategist at SolarWinds. Why Tiered Pricing Is Winning in the AI Era For years, SaaS companies could price mostly around value because marginal costs were relatively stable. AI changes the math. Dan points out that companies are now cutting meaningful monthly checks to model providers, and leadership teams can't pretend cost-to-serve is irrelevant anymore. That's a big reason tiered pricing is showing up everywhere right now. It gives teams a way to: Keep the offer simple for buyers Put premium capabilities where they belong Create a natural upgrade path that aligns with value and cost Most importantly, tiered pricing keeps you out of the weeds. The customer conversation stays focused on outcomes, not infrastructure. What Makes Tiered Pricing Actually Work Dan's point isn't "just shove AI into the top tier." Tiered pricing works when plan differences are easy to understand and tied to value drivers customers already recognize. Here are three practical patterns from the discussion that hold up well in the AI era. 1) Put AI in higher tiers when it boosts a user's output If an AI feature makes a person more effective—faster drafting, better triage, higher quality responses—tiering can be straightforward. The buyer already understands why a "Better" or "Best" plan costs more: it changes the capability of the team. This is also why seat-based pricing can still make sense for many AI-enhanced tools. If the value driver is still "help my team do better work," then users/seats remain an intuitive anchor. If AI increases team productivity, tiered pricing can stay aligned to seats—because seats still map to value. 2) Use add-ons when AI changes the value driver Sometimes AI doesn't just "help" the user—it replaces work entirely. When that happens, forcing it into the same tier structure can distort value and create confusion. Dan points to Intercom as a strong example of handling this well: The core support platform stays priced per user (agents), because the value driver is agent effectiveness. Their AI agent ("Fin AI") is priced separately because the agent isn't involved—the value is the number of issues the AI resolves. That's why per-resolution pricing makes sense. 3) Don't make buyers learn token math Dan's strongest warning is about token pricing. Customers don't want to learn what tokens are, and sales teams don't want to explain them—especially when you're selling a business outcome like faster support or better customer experience. Token-based pricing also shifts the conversation away from value and toward your vendor bill. As Dan puts it, customers don't care about your infrastructure costs, and pushing that complexity into the buying motion adds friction. If your tiered pricing requires a footnote explaining tokens, you're adding sand in the gears. A Tiered Pricing Checklist for AI Features Here's a simple way to apply this immediately: Good: Core workflow value, minimal AI (or AI where costs are predictable) Better: AI that boosts team output (speed, quality, throughput) Best: AI that drives outcomes at scale (automation, deflection, resolution) Add-on: Use when AI has a different value driver than the base product (example: per-resolution) Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Setting Your Development Pricing Fixed or Hourly Project Pricing A Project Management and Pricing Guide for Success Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content

Minimal viable pricing is the fastest way to stop debating what your product should cost and start learning what customers will actually pay for. In my interview with Dan Balcauski, founder and Chief Pricing Officer at Product Tranquility, we talked about how early-stage teams can set pricing that's "good enough" to sell, validate value, and iterate—without getting stuck chasing the perfect number. Pricing can feel risky because it shapes perception, positioning, and revenue. But Dan's message is practical: you don't need perfect pricing to move forward—you need minimal viable pricing that creates clear decisions and real feedback loops. Minimal viable pricing isn't "cheap pricing." It's "clear pricing" that helps you test value and drive decisions. About Dan Balcauski Dan Balcauski is the founder and Chief Pricing Officer at Product Tranquility, where he helps high-volume B2B SaaS CEOs define pricing and packaging for new products. A TopTal-certified Top 3% Product Management Professional, Dan also teaches in Kellogg Executive Education's Product Strategy coursework. Over the last 15 years, he has led products across the full lifecycle—from concept incubation to launch, platform transitions, maintenance, and end-of-life—across both consumer and B2B markets. Before Product Tranquility, he served as Head of Product at LawnStarter and as a Principal Product Strategist at SolarWinds following its $4B acquisition. What "minimal viable pricing" actually means Dan's approach starts with a mindset shift: early-stage companies rarely fail because their initial price was off by 10–20%. They fail because they haven't found a repeatable customer problem, a clear value promise, or a reliable way to acquire customers. Minimal viable pricing means: You set a price you can defend. You package it in a way customers can understand. You use real conversations and real deals to refine it. It's pricing as a learning tool—not a spreadsheet exercise. Minimal viable pricing starts with your "free option" One of the most actionable parts of the discussion was Dan's breakdown of freemium vs free trial—and why it matters so much for minimal viable pricing. A free trial creates urgency. There's a natural deadline, which forces customers to evaluate value and decide. A freemium model can work, but it often creates a huge pool of users who never engage deeply enough to convert. If your goal is to learn quickly, trials often generate clearer signals: Who gets value fast? What feature set drives adoption? What objections stop the purchase? Minimal viable pricing works best when your go-to-market motion creates real decisions—not endless "maybe later." Trial length: don't confuse "short" with "effective" There's a trend toward shorter trials (like 7 days), but Dan's point is simple: a short clock doesn't help if your customer can't realistically experience value in that window. In B2B especially, onboarding delays, competing priorities, and internal approvals can chew up days instantly. A minimal viable pricing approach asks: What's the shortest trial that still allows a motivated customer to succeed? If you're selling to teams, the answer is often longer than you think. Use minimal viable pricing to clarify positioning Dan also shared a framing that sticks: are you selling a Timex or a Rolex? In other words, are you competing on affordability and simplicity—or premium value and outcomes? Minimal viable pricing isn't just about the number. It's also about: The story your pricing tells The kind of customer you attract The expectations you set around results and support You don't need a dozen plans to communicate this. You need clarity. If customers can't tell who your product is for from the pricing page, your "pricing problem" might actually be a positioning problem. The goal: learn faster, not argue longer Minimal viable pricing gives you a way to move forward without pretending you have perfect information. Start with something simple, sell it, listen hard, and iterate. If you want a practical takeaway from Dan's perspective, it's this: pricing is one of your best feedback loops. Use it early. Use it intentionally. And don't let the hunt for "perfect" delay the real work—helping customers win. Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Defining An MVP Properly for Your Goals Price With Confidence: Estimation Made Simple How to Build a Minimal Viable Product Without Blowing Your Budget Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content

If you want real improvement—not just more dashboards—workflow efficiency metrics have to start with something most teams avoid: visibility. In Part 2 of our interview with Michael Toguchi, we move from "big ideas" into the operational reality leaders face every day: shadow tools, duplicate systems, fuzzy ROI, and the pricing pressure that shows up when AI makes work faster. This conversation is a reality check for ops leaders, engineering leaders, and consultants trying to scale without drowning in tool sprawl—or measuring productivity in ways that break trust. Workflow efficiency metrics only work when the workflow is visible. If work lives in shadows, your data will lie. About Michael Toguchi Michael Toguchi is the Chief Strategy Officer at eResources, where he leads strategy for technology that supports complex, high-stakes workflows across higher education and mission-driven organizations. With 25+ years in digital transformation, Michael helps teams reduce tool sprawl, eliminate manual bottlenecks, strengthen compliance, and measure improvements in ways that translate into real operational capacity and impact. Tool Sprawl Starts as "Helpful" (Until It Becomes Expensive) Every organization eventually meets the "skunk works" problem: someone builds a spreadsheet, a quick app, a mini database, or a side process that solves a real pain—fast. It's well-intentioned. It's also how silos form. Over time, those small fixes become a parallel organization: Data gets duplicated in multiple places Teams report numbers that don't match Leaders lose confidence in what's "true" Tech debt grows quietly because no one owns it end-to-end Michael's warning is simple: when every department solves problems in isolation, the organization pays for it later—usually in rework, compliance risk, and decision-making paralysis. Shadow tools don't just create tech debt—they create decision debt. Workflow Efficiency Metrics Start With Transparency, Not Control The fix isn't to ban spreadsheets or crush experimentation. Michael's approach is more practical: shine the light on the workflow, then standardize intentionally. That means asking better questions: Who is doing this work today—and why? Where does the data enter, and where does it leave? Which steps exist because the system is unclear… versus because the work is truly necessary? What systems must integrate so people aren't forced into duplicate entry? Transparency isn't micromanagement. It's a shared map. And once everyone sees the same map, you can make changes that stick. "Shine the transparency light on the workflow." Then decide what to standardize and integrate. Workflow Efficiency Metrics That Matter: Time Saved → Capacity Gained A big takeaway from Part 2 is how Michael thinks about measurement. Leaders often struggle here because "value" feels subjective—until you translate it into something tangible. Instead of measuring activity ("tickets closed" or "hours logged"), focus on outcomes: time reclaimed errors reduced handoffs eliminated cycle time improved compliance risk reduced Michael shares a practical framing: if you reclaim even a slice of time—say 15% of a team's capacity—that's not just a feel-good metric. It's a lever you can pull: that capacity becomes more customers served more projects shipped more support coverage fewer burnout-driven departures In other words, the metric isn't "time saved." The metric is what the organization can now do because time was saved. Time saved is only "real" when it turns into capacity, quality, or revenue. When AI Shrinks Time, Time-and-Materials Pricing Breaks Then Michael hits the business-model shift that a lot of teams are quietly wrestling with: AI compresses time. Work that took weeks can take days. The value may be the same—or higher—but the hours shrink. If you sell hours, you're forced into a bad choice: charge less (even if the impact is huge), or justify hours that no longer make sense Michael's answer is to move up the stack: value-based pricing, retainers, and partnership models—ways of charging for outcomes, access, and expertise instead of minutes on a clock. That shift requires maturity: you must be able to explain your value clearly and measure the results you're creating. Which brings us right back to the point of the episode… Workflow efficiency metrics aren't just internal tools. They're how you prove impact when "time spent" stops being the story. Value-priced work + retainers make sense when time shrinks—but outcomes still matter. Closing Thoughts on Workflow Efficiency Metrics Part 2 is a playbook for modern leaders: reduce tool sprawl with transparency, measure efficiency without eroding trust, and adapt your pricing model as AI changes the relationship between time and value. In a world where speed is easier to buy, the winners will be the teams who can see the workflow, measure what matters, and price the impact. Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Boost Your Developer Efficiency: Automation Tips for Developers Upgrading Your Business: Save Time And Improve Efficiency Invest In Your Team – They Will Want To Stay Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content

If you've ever felt like your team is running on duct tape and good intentions, you're not alone. In this Building Better Developers interview, Michael Toguchi (Chief Strategy Officer at eResources) makes a simple point that changes how you approach growth: process before tools. Before you buy another platform, automate another workflow, or roll out a new system, you need clarity on how the work actually gets done—and who it's meant to serve. You can't tool your way out of chaos. The real fix starts upstream—before the migration, before the CRM, before the next sprint. It starts with people, leadership, and making the work visible enough to improve it. Process before tools isn't a slogan—it's the difference between scaling sustainably and scaling stress. If you want, I can also tighten the second sentence to include the phrase again without sounding repetitive, but this version should clear the Yoast check immediately. About Michael Toguchi Michael Toguchi is the Chief Strategy Officer at eResources, where he helps lead a platform that manages complex workflows for scholarships, grants, admissions, and accessibility services. With 25+ years supporting universities, nonprofits, and foundations through digital transformation, Michael focuses on making systems simpler, sustainable, and human-centered—so teams can scale without burnout and spend more time on mission-driven work. Process Before Tools: Why "Survival Mode" Becomes the Default Michael describes a pattern that mission-driven organizations (and plenty of startups) fall into: survival mode. Everyone is moving fast, reacting to urgent needs, and doing what it takes to keep the wheels turning. The downside is that the process gets postponed indefinitely. The team says things like: "We'll document it later." "We'll clean it up after this deadline." "We just need something that works." And it does work… until it doesn't. When the organization grows, the cracks grow with it: inconsistent outcomes, tribal knowledge, bottlenecks, and the quiet creep of burnout. Process Before Tools: Start Small, Make It Digestible One of the strongest points Michael makes is that meaningful change rarely comes from a dramatic, top-down overhaul. The most sustainable improvements begin with small, digestible steps. Instead of trying to "fix everything," identify a single pain point the team feels every week: A handoff that always breaks A recurring rework loop A reporting task that eats hours A workflow that depends on one person's memory Then improve that one piece, measure it, and repeat. Sustainable change isn't a magic wand. It's a series of small wins that teams can actually absorb. Process Before Tools: You Need Leadership Alignment (Not Just Agreement) A lot of teams confuse "buy-in" with "approval." Leadership might approve a new system or initiative, but that's not the same as aligning on why it matters, what success looks like, and what tradeoffs are acceptable. Michael emphasizes clarity: What problem are we solving? Who owns the workflow? What will we stop doing to make room for the change? How will we know it's working? Without alignment, the organization drifts into mixed expectations—some people expect speed, others expect compliance, others expect perfect reporting. The result is frustration on all sides. Process Before Tools: Win With People, Not Platforms Michael's most practical warning is also the simplest: don't make it about tools. Tools can amplify a good process, but they can't create it. If you automate a messy workflow, you don't get a better workflow—you get a faster mess. The winning strategy is human-first: build champions inside the team communicate the vision in plain language reduce fear by making the change incremental keep feedback loops tight When teams feel heard, they participate. When they participate, the workflow becomes real. And once the workflow is real, the tool decision becomes obvious. Tools don't transform organizations—people do. Process Before Tools: A Practical Takeaway You Can Use This Week Here's a simple way to apply Part 1 immediately: Pick one workflow everyone complains about. Write down the steps as they happen today (no judgment). Identify one "failure point" (handoff, duplicate entry, unclear ownership). Fix only that this week. Tell the team what changed and why. That's how you move from survival mode to sustainable growth—without waiting for a budget cycle or a platform replacement. Closing Thoughts This interview is a reminder that building better systems is really about building better teams. Before you chase the next tool, tighten the workflow. Before you automate, clarify. Before you scale, align. In Part 2, we'll go deeper into workflow transparency, tool sprawl, measurable efficiency, and what happens when AI compresses time and challenges the way we price work. Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Individuals and Interactions Over Processes And Tools The Science Of Processes – Interview With Samuel Drauschak Automating Your Processes Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content

You validated the idea. You built the page. Maybe you're even getting traffic. And yet… the conversions don't match the effort. In Part 2 of our interview with Samir ElKamouny, we shift from "prove the concept" to conversion rate optimization—the discipline of diagnosing what's actually limiting growth and improving the parts of your funnel that matter most. This isn't about chasing shiny marketing tactics. It's about execution: the kind that turns a funnel from "pretty good" into "predictable." About Samir ElKamouny Samir ElKamouny is an entrepreneur and marketing expert who believes execution is everything—an early lesson inspired by his father's legacy of big ideas. He has helped scale businesses by pairing strategic action with a commitment to impact, guided by values such as Freedom, Happiness, Health, Family, and Spirituality. In this episode, that philosophy becomes funnel execution: identify the bottleneck, prioritize the 80/20, and optimize what's already working. Conversion Rate Optimization Starts With One Question: Where's the Constraint? Many teams skip straight to A/B testing headlines or tweaking button colors. Samir takes a more surgical approach. Before you optimize anything, you need to know what kind of problem you have: Do you have a traffic problem? Or do you have a conversion problem? Because those are different fixes. If you're not getting enough visitors, obsessing over landing page micro-changes won't move the needle. But if you are getting traffic and still not getting demos, leads, or signups—then you've got a conversion bottleneck, and conversion rate optimization is exactly the right tool. Bottleneck First Traffic problem = distribution. Demo problem = messaging, offer, trust, friction, or flow. Diagnose the constraint before you "optimize." Use the 80/20 Rule to Avoid Busywork Samir's funnel advice lines up with how great engineers debug systems: don't touch everything—find the one thing causing most of the pain. That's the 80/20 rule applied to marketing and funnels: A small number of pages create most conversions. A small number of objections block most sales. A small number of steps create most drop-off. When you apply conversion rate optimization well, you're not "improving your funnel" in general. You're improving the one point that's limiting everything downstream. A practical example: if you're generating leads but no one books calls, the issue probably isn't your top-of-funnel content. It's the handoff—your booking experience, your follow-up, or the clarity of what the call is for. The "Two-Second Clarity Test" for Positioning Samir emphasizes something that's brutally simple—and incredibly effective: When someone lands on your page, they should understand what you do in about two seconds. Not "kind of." Not "after reading three paragraphs." Two seconds. That clarity acts like a conversion multiplier. If visitors are confused, they don't scroll. They don't click. They bounce. And no amount of A/B testing can fix a page that doesn't communicate the offer. Two-Second Clarity Test: Can a first-time visitor instantly answer: What is this? Who is it for? What outcome do I get? If not, start there. Don't Test What Nobody Sees One of the most actionable parts of Part 2 is Samir's reminder to test based on attention, not opinions. Teams often test sections that aren't getting seen or clicked because they "feel important." But if users never reach that section—or don't interact with it—optimizing it is wasted effort. Instead, focus on experiments where user engagement is highest: above the fold the primary CTA area pricing/packages booking forms the first "proof" section (testimonials, logos, outcomes) That's how you make conversion rate optimization practical: test the parts of the page that actually get traffic, eyeballs, and clicks. A Simple Conversion Rate Optimization Framework You Can Use This Week Here's a clean execution loop you can run without overcomplicating it: Pick one conversion goal (demo booked, lead submitted, trial started). Locate the biggest drop-off (analytics + recordings + basic funnel tracking). Form one hypothesis ("People don't trust us yet," "Offer is unclear," "Form is too long"). Make one meaningful change (not five at once). Measure the result and keep only what improves the goal. That's it. Clear goal. One bottleneck. One change. Real measurement. Closing Thoughts: Optimize the Constraint, Not Your Ego The best part of Samir's approach is that it respects reality. It avoids "marketing theater" and focuses on execution that produces outcomes. If you want conversion rate optimization to work, don't start with cleverness. Start with constraints: Where are people dropping off? What do they not understand? What stops them from taking the next step? Fix that one thing, and the whole system improves. Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Business Tune-Up Checklist: How to Refresh, Refocus, and Reignite Mid-Year How to Succeed with Digital Marketing for Small Businesses Close Deals With LinkedIn Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content

If you're a developer or founder, you already know how to build. The hard part is building the right thing, for the right people, at the right time. In Part 1 of our interview with Samir ElKamouny, we dig into a practical market validation strategy that helps you avoid the most expensive mistake in software: investing months of effort into something the market didn't ask for. Samir's message is refreshingly grounded: big ideas are great, but execution is everything. And execution doesn't start with code—it starts with clarity, research, and small tests that tell you whether you're on the right path. About Samir ElKamouny Samir ElKamouny is an entrepreneur and marketing expert who believes execution is everything—an early lesson inspired by his father's legacy of big ideas. He's helped scale businesses by pairing strategic action with a commitment to impact, guided by values like Freedom, Happiness, Health, Family, and Spirituality. In this episode, that philosophy shows up as practical market validation: test demand and messaging before you overbuild. Market Validation Strategy: Start With "Is This Real?" Before "Can I Build It?" One of the biggest mindset shifts Samir reinforces is that your first job isn't product development—it's discovery. Before you worry about features, tech stacks, or perfect UI, you need answers to questions like: What problem are we solving—and for whom? What alternatives do people already use? Why would someone switch (or pay)? What would make this stand out in the market? This is where market research becomes your leverage. It reduces risk, sharpens your messaging, and keeps your roadmap tied to real-world demand instead of assumptions. Ideas Don't Win—Execution Wins: You can have a great idea, but if you can't clearly explain why it matters and who it's for, you'll struggle to sell it—even if you build it perfectly. Market Validation Strategy: Use Market Research to Find Differentiation Samir talks about loving market research because it forces you to look for what actually matters: differentiation. A useful way to think about this (especially for builders) is to treat your market research like a product spec—but for the buyer's brain: What are the top 3 pains people complain about? What outcomes do they want most? What language do they use to describe the problem? What do they distrust about existing options? That last point is gold: distrust is often where your positioning lives. If buyers think "all solutions in this space are overpriced and confusing," your market edge might be "simple, transparent, and fast to implement." Market Validation Strategy: Run the $5/Day Test (Before You Write Code) Here's where Samir gets extremely actionable: you don't need a perfect product to validate interest. You need a simple way to test messaging and capture intent. Think lightweight experiments: a basic landing page with one clear promise a short form ("Interested? Tell me your biggest challenge.") a tiny ad budget to test demand and messaging (Samir mentions even $5/day) a few direct conversations with the people you're building for This isn't about "launching." It's about getting signals—fast. The Goal Isn't Perfection—It's Proof: If people won't click, reply, or sign up when the idea is explained clearly, a bigger build won't fix that. Validation comes before optimization. Market Validation Strategy: Build a Funnel That Matches the Buyer's Learning Curve Samir also breaks down why funnels aren't one-size-fits-all. The funnel you need depends on how much your buyer must be educated before they can decide. If you're in a well-known category—say "CRM"—buyers already understand the problem and the solution type. Your job becomes differentiation and trust. But if your product is new, complex, or requires behavior change, you may need a longer funnel: more education, more examples, more proof, and more clarity before a buyer is ready to act. Either way, the key is to define the conversion goal (lead, consultation, free trial, signup) and build only what supports that path. Market Validation Strategy: A 48-Hour Checklist for Builders Try this quick validation sprint before you commit to a full build: Write a one-sentence offer (who it's for + outcome). Build a simple landing page (problem, promise, proof, CTA). Run a tiny ad test or post where your audience hangs out. Track clicks + form submissions (signals > opinions). Talk to 3–5 responders and ask what they expected. If the message lands, you've earned the right to build the next layer. If it doesn't, you just saved yourself months of building the wrong thing. Closing Thoughts: Execute Small, Learn Fast, Build Smart A strong market validation strategy is less about "finding the perfect idea" and more about building the habit of learning quickly. Samir's approach helps you move from assumptions to evidence—without betting your time, energy, or budget on hope. So before you spin up a repo, define your offer, test your messaging, and look for real-world signals. Once you have proof, then you can build with confidence—because you're not just building software. You're building something people actually want. In Part 2, we'll take the next step: how to diagnose funnel bottlenecks, improve clarity, and use smarter testing to increase conversions once you've got traction. Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Branding and Marketing Fundamentals with Kevin Adelsberger Leverage YouTube For Marketing And Brand Growth How to Succeed with Digital Marketing for Small Businesses Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content

New Year's Day hits different when you're recording with a live studio audience, passing the mic around, and starting the year with a mix of laughs, honest reflection, and big goals. In this Building Better Developers special episode, Rob Broadhead and Michael Meloche kick off 2026 by sharing a "good thing / bad thing" recap from a recent Christmas party—then opening the floor to the team to talk about the New Year developer goals. It's casual, it's real, and it's a reminder that growth (personal and professional) usually starts with clarity. Michael's 2026 New Year developer goals: Payoff and Growth When the conversation turns forward, Michael shares something that hits hard for anyone building a business—or rebuilding momentum. He describes the last year (or two) as a heavy investment: retooling, branding, marketing, refining direction, and putting in the work that doesn't immediately show results. Now, in 2026, he's looking for payoff—not in a "get rich quick" way, but in the sense of seeing the fruits of consistent effort. He also mentions narrowing focus for Develpreneur and wanting to see that a clearer direction translates into growth. There's something powerful about that moment: when you stop trying to do everything, and start building depth in the things that matter. If you spent 2025 laying groundwork, 2026 is your chance to ship with confidence. Foundations aren't the finish line—but they make speed possible. Rob's 2026 New Year developer goals: Scale, Network, and Teach Again Rob's focus is straightforward: he wants to keep growing the business, but also move from "a couple projects went well" to scaling—bringing in more work and creating consistent momentum. One of the practical strategies he calls out is getting out more: business conventions, tech conventions, and networking. Not just online—real-world conversations that create opportunities. He also hints at something long-time listeners will appreciate: he wants to relaunch teaching episodes. That includes new "kitchen sink" style applications, plus content around AI and emerging technologies. It's a return to hands-on learning—less theory, more building. Team Voices on New Year developer goals: Milestones, Features, and New Seasons Wes, a programmer at RRB Consulting, brings a personal win that feels like pure New Year energy: his car is getting paid off early in the year. That's freedom. Breathing room. And honestly, a reminder that progress isn't only measured in commits and deployments. Professionally, Wes is excited about projects with features coming together in the first quarter—things moving from "in progress" to "in the client's hands." Natalie shares that 2026 is a "new season of change" for her—wrapping up big chapters and getting ready to reinvest significant time back into RRB. Rob adds another layer: he's planning to be a digital nomad in 2026 and launching a site to document the adventures and the tech behind them. One Day at a Time (Yes, Even for Developers) As the episode closes, there's a simple challenge: don't give up on your New Year's resolutions on day one. Make it to day two. Day three. Day ten. Keep it small. Keep it moving. And then: back to interviews, back to Building Better Foundations, and the ongoing push toward major milestones—like eventually hitting episode 1000. Pick one small habit you can keep for 10 days. If you can do 10, you can do 30. If you can do 30, you can change your year. Ready for 2026? This episode isn't about perfect plans—it's about momentum, focus, and showing up. Whether you're chasing payoff after a long build season, scaling your business, shipping features, or stepping into a new chapter… the message is the same: Start. Today. Then do it again tomorrow. Happy New Year—and we'll see you in the next episode. Stay Connected: Join the Developreneur Community We invite you to join our community and share your coding journey with us. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting, there's always room to learn and grow together. Contact us at info@develpreneur.com with your questions, feedback, or suggestions for future episodes. Together, let's continue exploring the exciting world of software development. Additional Resources Strategies for Your New Year Planning Become A Better Developer In The New Year Goal Setting and Habits: The Keys to a Productive New Year Building Better Foundations Podcast Videos – With Bonus Content