Mind Chat

Andy Clark is a leading and incredibly influential philosopher and cognitive scientist. Among other things, Andy has done pioneering work on predictive processing and the extended mind thesis. Here Keith and Philip discuss with Andy his most recent book 'The Experience Machine.' https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/may/04/the-experience-machine-how-our-minds-predict-and-shape-reality-review

A captivating discussion unfolds as Philip shares his journey into a heretical form of Christianity. The conversation dives into the complexities of trust versus belief, emphasizing open-mindedness in personal spirituality. Transformative interpretations of resurrection are explored, connecting deeply with early Christian experiences. The speakers tackle the intersection of faith and cosmic evolution, advocating for flexibility in beliefs. They emphasize the importance of adapting to new evidence, while celebrating the joy of philosophical inquiry.

Annaka Harris is author of bestselling book "Conscious" and writer and producer of the forthcoming audio documentary series "Lights On." In this episode we mainly focused on panpsychism, although we also touched on free will and the self. Annaka is sympathetic to panpsychism, so Philip and Annaka compared their reasons for taking the view seriously, whilst Keith and Annaka tried to work out why they disagreed.

Can taking psychedelics teach us more about the mind than science and philosophy? Is it rational to trust what mystical experiences seem to be telling us about ultimate reality? These are questions Keith and Philip would like the answers to, and apparently Sarah Lane-Ritchie and Aidan Lyon have them. Join us to find out what they are!

Kevin Mitchell, an Associate Professor of Genetics and Neuroscience at Trinity College Dublin and author of 'Free Agents: How Evolution Gave us Free Will', dives deep into the fascinating intersection of free will and neuroscience. He discusses how genetics and brain wiring shape our decisions and personality. The conversation tackles complex ideas such as determinism, indeterminacy, and the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics. Through engaging banter, Mitchell and the hosts unfold the nuanced relationship between biology and the essence of human agency.

Cat Gillen, philosopher of science doctoral candidate, discusses the debate between realists and instrumentalists in the philosophy of science, focusing on the existence of electrons. They explore historical experiments, evidence, and theories surrounding electrons, as well as the implications in various scientific fields. They also touch on the challenges faced by realists in proving their theories and the existence and reality of human thoughts.

Keith and Philip will discuss Philip's new book 'Why? The Purpose of the Universe.' https://www.amazon.co.uk/Why-Purpose-Universe-Philip-Goff/dp/0198883765

Donald Hoffman is a cognitive scientist at UC Irvine and author of 'The Case Against Reality.' He believes that the world we experience is an illusion, whilst ultimate reality is composed of networks of conscious agents. Keith and Philip probe Professor Hoffman's view from their very different perspectives on the nature of consciousness. Here's the paper we discuss at length which argues that Donald's argument from evolution is self-defeating: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-022-04021-1 Here's Donald's recent co-written paper in which the authors attempt to ground physics in networks of conscious agents: https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/25/1/129

Eric Schwitzgebel is professor of Philosophy at the University of California, Riverside. His research interests include philosophy of psychology, philosophy of mind, moral psychology, classical Chinese philosophy, epistemology, metaphilosophy, and metaphysics. He has also written a number of pieces of philosophical science fiction, which have been published in leading science fiction magazines.

Many philosophers worry about David Chalmers' 'hard problem' of how brains produce consciousness. But do ordinary people who haven't been exposed to the peculiarities of academic philosopher share Chalmers' intuition that there's a problem here? Professor Edouard Machery (University of Pittsburgh-Carnegie Mellon University) answers 'no.' Machery thinks the concept of 'phenomenal consciousness' that gives rise to these intuitions is an invention of academic philosophers, and he's built an empirical case to support his view, based on interviews with the general public. Dr Michelle Liu (University of Hertfordshire-Monash) has responded to the arguments of Machery and others, suggesting they may be ignoring to polysemous nature of language. Keith and Philip will host a friendly debate/discussion between Machery and Liu, whilst trying to resist the temptation to bring the discussion back to panpsychism and illusionism.