Daniel Davis Deep Dive

Trump's Developing Deal w/IranSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: Etsy storehttps://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnav Trump envoy Steve Witco indicated on Fox News that a negotiated settlement to end the war in Ukraine between the U.S. and Russia might be near. While that could be good news for those wanting the war to end, it raised tensions with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who appears resistant to such negotiations.Key Points:Trump vs. Zelensky:Zelensky criticized Trump and Vice President Harris on 60 Minutes.Analysts argue Trump may now have more tension with Zelensky than with Putin.Trump recently said the war "wasn't his" but now it's his responsibility as president.Trump's Stance on Ending the War:Trump has talked about ending the war quickly but hasn't yet taken concrete action.Critics say his administration has largely continued Biden’s Ukraine policy, including ongoing military aid.Colonel Doug Macgregor’s View:Says Trump hasn't fully taken control of U.S. foreign policy.Believes Zelensky should’ve been cut off from U.S. support early.Claims Trump needs to stop vacillating and take decisive leadership.Responsibility for the War:Trump said Putin shouldn’t have started it, but also that Zelensky and Biden could have prevented it.Macgregor agrees Biden could have stopped the war by halting NATO expansion and negotiating with Russia.Criticism of NATO and Western Strategy:The war stems from NATO’s eastward expansion and ignoring Russian warnings.NATO military support for Ukraine has failed strategically and tactically, with Ukrainian forces bearing the cost.European & British Reaction:Some in the UK accuse Trump of repeating Kremlin propaganda.Macgregor dismisses these critics as part of a declining British elite clinging to outdated power structures.Zelensky's Role in Prolonging War:He’s accused of ignoring peace opportunities (e.g. Minsk agreements, Istanbul talks).Critics say Zelensky’s policies provoked conflict by pushing to retake Crimea and other disputed regions.Geopolitical Shifts:The conversation criticizes America’s failed economic war on China and its diminishing global power.Macgregor argues the “natural world order” (U.S.-led post-WWII dominance) is fading, and new powers (e.g., BRICS nations) are rising.Conclusion: The discussion is highly critical of U.S. and NATO policies, portrays Zelensky as a puppet propped up by Western elites, and urges Trump to stop wavering and act decisively to end the war. It reflects a broader skepticism of current Western foreign policy and highlights shifting global power dynamics.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Daniel Davis Deep Dive Merch: https://www.etsy.com/shop/DanielDavisDeepDive?ref=seller-platform-mcnavUkrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky insists that a “just peace” means reclaiming all Ukrainian territory occupied by Russia, stating that Ukraine will never accept Russian control of those areas. He emphasizes Ukraine’s sovereignty and determination, though he doesn’t offer a clear strategy for how to achieve this.The discussion then shifts to the geopolitical tension between Zelensky, Putin, and Trump, suggesting that Zelensky and parts of Europe may be trying to drive a wedge between Trump and Putin, potentially complicating peace negotiations. There's concern that some European leaders, such as Macron and Scholz, are more focused on political posturing than on military or diplomatic effectiveness.Colonel Jacques Baud, a former NATO officer, critiques the lack of clear Western strategy—both from Zelensky and European leaders. He argues that:Zelensky continues military operations that have failed and lacked strategic value.Ukraine missed an opportunity for peace in April 2022.Western nations, including the EU, show no real plan for resolution—relying instead on anti-Russia rhetoric and symbolic gestures.Trump, despite criticisms, at least shows a willingness to engage diplomatically with Russia.A missile strike on the Ukrainian city of Sumy is discussed as a case study in propaganda and blame. Zelensky used the attack to condemn Russia, but a Ukrainian politician revealed that a military ceremony in a civilian area may have provoked the strike. Baud suggests these narratives may be manipulated to maintain Western support, and stresses the need for neutral international investigations into such incidents.The segment ends with a broader critique of European diplomacy, particularly figures like Kaja Kallas, who focus heavily on anti-Russia sentiment without offering coherent strategies or engaging in other global crises.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Trump's Peace Initiative: Donald Trump has prioritized ending the Russia-Ukraine war in his 2024 presidential campaign. Since returning to office, he has initiated diplomacy previously absent, including sending delegations and engaging directly with Vladimir Putin.Recent Diplomacy: Steve Witkoff, one of Trump’s envoys, met with Putin in St. Petersburg in a 5-hour meeting. This is part of ongoing negotiations aimed at brokering peace. Meanwhile, Trump has had direct communication with Putin and sent multiple delegations abroad.Conflicting US Strategies: There is internal conflict within Trump’s team:Steve Witkoff has proposed a controversial plan that reportedly accepts Russia's control over four eastern Ukrainian regions, drawing backlash from humanitarian groups and political figures.Keith Kellogg, another Trump envoy, opposes Witkoff’s plan, arguing it would require Ukraine to cede too much and abandon civilians in contested areas.Russian Demands: Russia, through figures like Sergey Lavrov, insists on:Recognition of territorial claims (June 14 lines).Ukrainian neutrality (no NATO membership).Demilitarization and “denazification” of Ukraine.Kellogg's Alternative Plan: Kellogg proposed a post-war partition of Ukraine similar to post-WWII Berlin, with Western forces (British and French) stationed in western Ukraine. This is seen as provocative by Russia, contradicting their demand for no NATO presence.Ukrainian Dilemma: Ukraine faces a difficult choice—either accept Trump-Putin terms and potentially lose territory and displace civilians, or continue fighting with uncertain Western support. The conflict is reaching a decision point.Conclusion: The path to peace is complicated by internal U.S. disagreements, firm Russian demands, and the harsh reality for Ukrainian leadership. Any progress will likely hinge on whether a direct Trump-Putin meeting occurs and what terms can realistically be accepted by all sides.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

China Strikes Back against U.S. / Lt Col Daniel DavisSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Western Ammunition Depletion:The UK and EU have depleted their munitions stockpiles by sending old or excess supplies to Ukraine.These supplies were often destroyed after arrival, particularly in Poland.Europe now has little left and is borrowing money to fund further aid, with no clear return on investment.Western Narratives vs. Reality:Western leaders and media have repeatedly claimed Russia was on the verge of collapse—running out of ammunition, tanks, and troops—which has proven false.In contrast, Russia has increased military production and reportedly has far superior industrial and manpower reserves compared to Ukraine and the West.Russian Military Strength:Russia is producing more equipment and munitions than the combined West, bolstered by support from countries like North Korea.Russia also has a large reserve of trained military personnel they can still mobilize, unlike Ukraine.Inevitability of Russian Advances:If diplomatic solutions fail, Russia is likely to continue expanding on the battlefield.Ukrainian manpower and resources are insufficient to resist a sustained Russian offensive.Diplomacy & U.S. Role:Unlike Western Europe, which is accused of ignoring root causes, the U.S. is engaging in deeper discussions with Russia, including post-war relations, disarmament, and economic issues.Russian officials, particularly Lavrov, emphasize that NATO expansion into Ukraine was a red line and must be reversed permanently for peace.Territorial Demands:Russia dismisses the idea of returning to Ukraine’s 1991 borders.The "minimum" Russian demands now appear to include full control over the four annexed regions and possibly more territory, especially areas with significant ethnic Russian populations.Russian Offensive Movements:Video and intelligence suggest Russia is mobilizing for a new offensive, especially in the Zaporizhzhia region.These movements signal strategic intent, not just bargaining, as Russia appears ready and willing to continue advancing militarily.Zelensky’s Position:Ukraine continues to request more Western support, particularly Patriot missile systems, but has received little.Ukraine’s stance remains firm on not ceding territory, though this position appears increasingly untenable given the military imbalance.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Please visit Alexander at: https://www.youtube.com/@AlexMercouris/videoshttps://www.youtube.com/@TheDuran/videosSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The discussion focuses on the current state of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, offering a critical view of Western narratives and emphasizing Russia's growing strength and strategic advances.Military Situation: Russia is reportedly making steady advances along the entire frontline (~2,000 km), particularly in Zaporizhzhia and Sumy. While Ukraine occasionally mounts local counterattacks and regains small areas, these are often temporary and reversed.Russian Strategy: According to analyst Larry Johnson, Russia is already engaged in a large-scale, coordinated offensive involving significant forces. Their operations aim to overstretch Ukrainian defenses, which are increasingly under strain due to manpower and resource shortages.Future Outlook: Russia is expected to continue pushing toward the Dnipro River, intending to annex and hold all territory east of it. Referendums may follow to integrate these areas into Russia, similar to past votes in Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia.Western and Ukrainian Leadership Critique: Western military officials (like Gen. Cavoli and Ben Hodges) are accused of misrepresenting the situation, suggesting Ukraine is improving while Russia struggles. The presenters criticize this as delusional and liken it to past U.S. military leadership errors in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan.Casualties and Resources: Russia is believed to be inflicting heavy losses on Ukrainian forces while minimizing its own. Despite claims of Russian setbacks, Johnson argues that Russia’s military production (especially artillery) exceeds that of the U.S. and Europe combined.Strategic Framing: The presenters argue that Russia is fighting a proxy war against NATO, while the West underestimates Russia’s resolve and overestimates Ukraine’s ability to sustain the fight.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

The speaker compares the Rwandan genocide and the replacement of local Tutsi populations by those from Uganda to Israel’s displacement of Palestinians in 1948. He argues that forcibly moving people does not resolve conflict—it creates enduring resentment and calls for return.The Gaza Blockade:The claim that Israel didn’t "lock in" Gazans is disputed. The speaker stresses that Gaza has been under an Israeli siege for 16 years—by land, air, and sea—with only limited Egyptian access. This has effectively trapped the population and controlled their movement and resources.Palestinian Displacement as Policy:The idea of "giving Gazans a choice to leave" is framed as a euphemism for ethnic cleansing. The speaker argues that even if some countries accepted refugees, millions would remain. He fears a humanitarian catastrophe and says Israel’s policies risk massive civilian death.Lack of Political Vision:He criticizes Israeli leadership, particularly Netanyahu, for having no long-term solution beyond maintaining a status quo of conflict and suffering. The speaker claims Netanyahu is prolonging the war for political survival.The Future of Israel:The presentation warns that Israel risks becoming a full apartheid state and a global pariah, losing support even among Jewish communities worldwide. Without a vision of shared equality, peace is unattainable.International Complicity and Guilt:The West is accused of enabling Israel due to Holocaust guilt. This guilt, the speaker says, is perversely allowing actions that harm Palestinians and, ultimately, Jews themselves.The Holocaust and International Law:He argues that Israel is using the Holocaust as justification for disproportionate violence and in doing so, undermining the entire post-WWII international legal framework meant to prevent atrocities.The conversation ends with the interviewer expressing deep gratitude for the speaker's willingness to speak out despite backlash, and a shared belief that the current trajectory will have lasting negative consequences for all parties involved.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Trump imposed 104% tariffs on China, emphasizing his strategy of retaliating aggressively when challenged.He believes China wants to make a deal but doesn’t know how to start negotiations.Trump is open to negotiations and claims he will be “gracious” if China reaches out.China’s Reaction:In response, China imposed 84% tariffs on the U.S., signaling they will not be intimidated and are ready to push back hard.Expert Commentary (Prof. John Mearsheimer):China and other nations (Russia, Iran, North Korea) understand Trump only respects toughness.The current situation is a classic case of hardball diplomacy, with both sides posturing strongly.Strategic View:Trump sees short-term economic pain as necessary for long-term gain:Absolute gain: Rebuilding U.S. manufacturing will benefit America economically.Relative gain: China will be hurt more, shifting the power balance in favor of the U.S.Skepticism from Economists:Most economists see these tariffs as a "boneheaded" move, likely to hurt the global economy and disrupt trade without clear benefits.Long-Term Uncertainty:The true effects of these tariffs are unpredictable, similar to how sanctions on Russia didn’t have the intended effect.Diplomatic Repercussions:Trump's aggressive, transactional approach undermines trust in U.S. reliability as a partner.Allies in East and Southeast Asia (e.g., South Korea, Vietnam) may begin to reassess their ties with the U.S.Vietnam Case Study:Vietnam, heavily reliant on U.S. trade, is panicked by the tariffs despite being eager to cooperate.Damaging economic ties with Vietnam may also undermine important security alliances in the region.John Bolton’s View:Bolton criticizes Trump for eroding decades of international trust and says this creates an opening for China.The issue isn’t just economic—it’s about the U.S. losing its reputation as a reliable global leader.Final Thoughts:The consensus is that while Trump’s approach may yield some leverage, the cost to U.S. credibility and alliances could be profound and lastingSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.