Daniel Davis Deep Dive

Jennifer Kavanagh, a Senior Fellow and Director of Military Analysis at Defense Priorities, shares her insights on Trump's approach to foreign relations, especially regarding Russia. She discusses the complexities of potential peace negotiations involving land swaps in the Ukraine-Russia conflict and highlights the challenges Ukraine faces in securing its defense. Kavanagh emphasizes the importance of realistic expectations in diplomacy and the need for effective U.S. leadership while navigating the delicate balance of international relations.

Jim Jatras, a former U.S. diplomat and GOP Senate foreign policy advisor, discusses the complex dynamics of the anticipated Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska. He highlights Russia's strategic move to restore diplomatic ties while promoting economic cooperation and arms control. Jatras critiques the West's military support for Ukraine, suggesting it relies on propaganda. The meeting, framed by Trump as a significant maneuver, raises questions about real outcomes versus political optics, emphasizing the uncertain landscape of U.S.-Russia relations.

John Mearsheimer, an esteemed international relations theorist and professor at the University of Chicago, dives into the intricate world of geopolitical dynamics. He discusses the political maneuvering behind the U.S.-Russia summit, revealing a lack of substantial negotiation groundwork. Mearsheimer critiques the effectiveness of sanctions against Russia, especially in light of India's continued oil imports. He also examines the complexities of the Ukraine conflict and the challenges facing Ukrainian forces, concluding that true resolution may hinge on battlefield realities.

Larry Johnson, a CIA analyst and friend of the host, dives into the contrasting personas of Donald Trump. He explores the public's perception of Trump as a decisive leader versus his more insecure, accommodating private self. Johnson discusses Putin's unwavering stance on territorial claims in Ukraine and how Trump might leverage this to present a peace plan. The conversation also touches on Russia's military advances and the broader implications for international relations, emphasizing the complex dynamics shaping their upcoming meeting.

Doug Macgregor, a former defense advisor and decorated veteran, dives into the geopolitical quagmire of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. He emphasizes the importance of acknowledging Russia's security concerns to forge any meaningful peace. Macgregor discusses the challenges Trump may face in negotiating with Putin, particularly regarding NATO's lack of unity. He also critiques U.S. foreign policy and the detachment of leadership from military realities, while considering the stakes for Eastern European nations. The conversation highlights the urgent need for reassessment and potential resolutions in Alaska.

Trump Betrays Ukraine'? No. West Betrays Itself /Lt Col Daniel DavisSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

A Belarus-floated proposal for an “airspace truce” — reportedly originating from unnamed Americans — could give Russia some relief from Ukrainian strikes without endangering its overall position, offering Trump a symbolic win to take from his meeting with Putin. Putin may consider it to maintain good relations with Trump, but Zelensky sees any U.S.-Russia dialogue as a threat, wanting to block it and keep Trump aligned with Kyiv’s stance. Zelensky was not invited to the Alaska meeting, which likely annoyed him, and he’s framing Trump as at risk of being deceived by Putin.Meanwhile, NATO chief Mark Rutte is pressing Trump to “test” Putin, framing negotiations on terms favorable to Ukraine — no demilitarization, no territorial concessions, full NATO presence — demands Moscow sees as unacceptable, especially given Ukraine’s battlefield struggles. This European hardline approach is coordinated among EU leaders, but contrasts with U.S. VP JD Vance’s message that America is done funding the war; if Europe wants to continue, they should pay for it themselves. Vance’s stance signals U.S. impatience and warns Europe that without concessions toward peace, they may be left to carry the war effort alone.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Five days before the planned Alaska meeting between Trump and Putin, aimed at ending the war, tensions are high among four key stakeholders — Russia, the U.S., Ukraine, and Europe — whose positions overlap in some areas but often conflict, especially on the Western side.Trump has floated a plan involving territorial swaps, suggesting Russia might give up small footholds in Sumy and Kharkiv in exchange for Ukrainian withdrawal from parts of the Donbas or other occupied areas. While this might be acceptable to Putin for less strategic areas, the real sticking point is the larger territories in eastern and southern Ukraine that Russia has controlled since 2024, which Putin demands Ukraine vacate entirely.Trump expects Zelensky to “sign something” formalizing territorial changes, but Zelensky has firmly rejected land swaps or validating Russia’s seizures, insisting instead on an immediate, unconditional ceasefire — something Trump has not prioritized. Past Trump deadlines for securing peace have repeatedly lapsed, and his current focus is on land deals rather than halting the fighting.The clash is clear: Trump is preparing for a deal involving concessions, while Zelensky refuses to legitimize territorial loss. European positions are similarly tied to ideals rather than on-the-ground realities, while Russia holds and consolidates its gains. Sanctions have failed to shift Moscow’s stance, leaving the negotiations set against a stark imbalance of power that favors Russia.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

ALASKA SUMMIT: Zelensky Rejects Land Concessions /Lt Col Daniel DavisSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

President Trump met with Indian Prime Minister Modi in India, with discussions focused on trade, defense cooperation, and security. Trump used the visit to showcase strong U.S.–India ties and signal a united front against China.A major highlight was Trump’s announcement that the U.S. would increase tariffs on certain Indian imports, a move that surprised many given the visit’s otherwise friendly tone. The tariffs are part of a broader U.S. trade policy push for better market access and protection of American industries.Defense talks included the sale of advanced U.S. helicopters and plans for deeper military coordination in the Indo-Pacific, reinforcing both nations’ role in countering Chinese influence in the region.Culturally, the trip featured large public rallies and heavy emphasis on personal rapport between Trump and Modi, aimed at projecting political strength for both leaders at home.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.