Daniel Davis Deep Dive

President Donald Trump has issued a series of inflammatory posts on Truth Social indicating the U.S. now has “complete control” of the skies over Iran and suggesting he knows the location of Iran’s Supreme Leader, calling him an “easy target” but stating they won’t strike “for now.” He also demanded “unconditional surrender” from Iran, implying potential U.S. military action if provocations continue. This follows a national security meeting after his abrupt return from the G7 summit.Analyst Larry Johnson, a former CIA official, reacted with alarm, saying Trump appears poised to launch a war against Iran without congressional approval, a decision he calls reckless and politically disastrous. Johnson warns this could split Trump’s base and likens it to the Iraq War—calling it another conflict based on misinformation. Prominent Trump allies like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, and Charlie Kirk have voiced strong opposition, fearing it will destroy Trump's presidency and damage the U.S. long-term.Tucker Carlson specifically warned it could mark the "end of the American empire" and expressed disappointment that Trump resorted to personal attacks rather than addressing criticism. Johnson echoed this frustration, calling Trump “thin-skinned” and “narcissistic,” and stated he now regrets voting for him. He emphasized that Iran, unlike Israel, complies with international nuclear inspection protocols, and suggested that Trump’s rhetoric is dangerously close to fabricating a new war under false pretenses.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Trump Summons WAR CABINET / The Countdown to War with IRAN? Lt Col Daniel DavisSee Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Andrei Martyanov, a veteran author and military expert, shares sharp insights on the escalating tensions between Israel and Iran. He disputes Israeli claims of air superiority, arguing that their military is ill-equipped for 21st-century warfare. Martyanov critiques the ideological stance against negotiations taken by Netanyahu, stressing the risks of increasing U.S. involvement. He highlights how missteps in Israeli strategy have paradoxically bolstered Iranian resolve and explores the implications of a potential conflict escalating in the region.

Diana Panchenko, a renowned Ukrainian journalist and former Journalist of the Year, presents a bleak yet insightful perspective on the ongoing war in Ukraine. She uncovers the extreme hardships faced by ordinary citizens, from financial struggles to forced conscription. The discussion reveals a widespread desire for peace among Ukrainians, challenging the narrative of unwavering support for President Zelensky. Panchenko highlights the corruption and suppression of dissent within the government, painting a troubling picture of life under authoritarianism amidst conflict.

A bold military campaign by Israel, called Operation Rising Lion, targets Iran's nuclear threat and high-ranking IRGC figures. They claim Iran is dangerously close to developing nuclear weapons. The aftermath reveals severe damage in Tehran, raising skepticism about the intelligence behind the strikes. The U.S. distanced itself from the conflict, heightening fears of a wider war. Discussions touch on the complex U.S.-Israel relationship and the troubling role of biblical interpretations in justifying military actions, urging a focus on diplomacy instead.

Francis Farrell, a frontline journalist from the Kyiv Independent, shares gripping insights from his reporting in Ukraine. He discusses the brutal realities of infantry operations, the impact of drone warfare, and the logistic nightmares faced by troops. The conversation reveals how artillery's role has diminished with the rise of drones, which now cause the majority of injuries. Farrell also highlights the challenges of mobilization, press freedom in wartime, and the complexities surrounding governance and negotiations amid ongoing conflict.

The discussion critiques Western narratives regarding Russia's intentions in Ukraine, highlighting the media's misrepresentation. It reveals Putin's focus on security rather than empire restoration and his consistent diplomatic proposals that were overlooked. The protective military buildup on Russia's western flank is also examined, along with NATO's strategic missteps. Additionally, the podcast addresses the potential shift in Russia's military approach and the dangers of nuclear escalation, calling for a more nuanced understanding of international dynamics.

The discussion critiques U.S. arrogance in its support for Ukraine, suggesting that American leaders are out of touch with reality. It questions the effectiveness of Western aid while highlighting Russia's unexpected resilience. There are warnings against escalating military involvement, which could lead to nuclear conflict. The speaker calls for immediate U.S. withdrawal, urging a reevaluation of geopolitical strategies. Ultimately, it emphasizes the need for realistic diplomacy over reckless ambition.

President Trump's dwindling faith in the Iran deal raises questions about U.S. military action, which is deemed unconstitutional without Congress. The discussion highlights that Iran, while enriching uranium, is not building nuclear weapons and poses no imminent threat. The critics argue that any strike would be unlawful and counterproductive. The influence of Israel's aggression on U.S. involvement is emphasized, alongside the need for diplomatic efforts to avoid conflict. The podcast also touches on the broader implications of U.S. actions on foreign relations.

Douglas Macgregor, a defense and foreign policy analyst, argues that Russia has strategically won the war in Ukraine while NATO's capabilities are overstated. He explains that Putin's slow advance is intentional, aimed at preventing a direct confrontation with the West. Macgregor claims NATO would struggle in a direct conflict and criticizes Ukrainian President Zelensky as a barrier to peace. He also highlights the need for decisive Russian action and critiques Western media for supporting pro-war narratives without questioning Zelensky's claims.