#STRask

Delve into the intriguing world of progressive Christianity and its departure from traditional beliefs. Discover how some interpret John 16:12–13 to support their views and the implications of such interpretations. Explore the clash between the authority of Scripture and progressive perspectives, as well as the complexities surrounding divine judgment and moral standards. The discussion also highlights the significance of the apostles' authority when understanding biblical truths, shedding light on the ongoing debate within modern faith.

This podcast dives into the intriguing complexities of interpreting divine revelation. It questions the credibility of biblical authors like Moses compared to figures like Joseph Smith. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between subjective experiences and objective truths in religious claims. Historical validation of Moses' revelations is highlighted, showcasing tangible evidence that strengthened communal faith. The episode also tackles the philosophical debate on differing truths, urging listeners to discern between individual perceptions and the reality of truth.

The discussion dives into the intriguing contrast between divine inspiration of scriptures and cultic automatic writing, highlighting human authors' unique contributions. Questions arise about the anonymity of many New Testament authors and the legitimacy of adhering to man-made statements of faith in clergy. The complexities of preachers straying from biblical teachings are examined, alongside the essential role of listeners' receptiveness to the transformative power of God's word, illustrating the dynamic nature of faith and interpretation.

Dive into thought-provoking discussions on the nature of divine justice and the perplexing reality of unpunished wrongs. Explore the critical role of the Crucifixion in balancing mercy and justice. Delve into the contrasts between human and divine perspectives on accountability. Unpack how God's promises address spiritual needs and reflect on the moral implications of retribution. Ultimately, the conversation challenges listeners to rethink their understanding of justice through a theological lens.

The podcast dives into the ethically charged principle of double effect, questioning its legitimacy in abortion contexts, especially when a mother's life is at stake. It tackles whether pregnant women should be forced to choose between their lives and their babies'. The discussion also scrutinizes legal complexities surrounding non-viable pregnancies and how pro-life policies can hinder medical care. Finally, it debates the strategic choice of remaining in pro-choice areas to inspire change versus relocating to pro-life regions, highlighting personal circumstances in decision-making.

Explore how biblical principles should inform Christian voting decisions. Discover the government's role in promoting good and punishing evil. Learn about the importance of interpreting laws through God's definition of love and justice. Dive into navigating political disagreements with grace, highlighting differing worldviews on governance. Finally, understand how to align personal values with godly standards in the voting process, focusing on informed conscience without endorsing specific candidates.

The podcast dives into the debate on whether one should limit their studies to the Bible alone, comparing this to how currency experts must understand the real deal to spot counterfeits. It discusses the implications of 2 John 10's caution against opposing views while promoting meaningful dialogue. The rise of questions around sexuality and gender post-2015 is highlighted, along with the shift in apologetic inquiries from philosophical to practical concerns, reflecting changes in cultural dynamics and community engagement.

Dive into the provocative question of when a human receives a soul, with insights into the zygote stage and the philosophical implications. Explore the complex relationship between body and soul, asserting personhood from conception. The discussion tackles controversial abortion views, distinguishing scientific facts from moral debates. The pro-life perspective is defended as a matter of unborn rights, while strategies for respectful conversation on life's value are emphasized, encouraging open dialogue amidst differing opinions.

The conversation dives into the theological implications of gender identity, challenging traditional beliefs about divine intentions. It discusses how to maintain respect while guiding children with differing beliefs in a youth group. The complexities of supporting kids with gender dysphoria are explored, emphasizing love intertwined with truth. Listeners learn how to navigate emotional 'what ifs' grounded in Scripture, advocating for kindness and empathy even amidst disagreement.

The discussion dives into whether good experiences are directly linked to God's actions or mere coincidences. It addresses the dilemma of miracles being scientifically explainable and challenges the notion of divine intervention. The hosts tackle the skepticism surrounding prayer, especially when faced with drought, emphasizing that prayers reflect genuine requests rather than attempts to manipulate outcomes. Ultimately, they highlight the omnipresence of God's goodness, extending even to non-believers.