#STRask How Do We Know Moses Interpreted His Experiences of God Correctly?
Nov 4, 2024
This podcast dives into the intriguing complexities of interpreting divine revelation. It questions the credibility of biblical authors like Moses compared to figures like Joseph Smith. The discussion emphasizes the distinction between subjective experiences and objective truths in religious claims. Historical validation of Moses' revelations is highlighted, showcasing tangible evidence that strengthened communal faith. The episode also tackles the philosophical debate on differing truths, urging listeners to discern between individual perceptions and the reality of truth.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Subjectivity vs. Objectivity
- All knowledge is subjective because we, as subjects, perceive and interpret information.
- However, not all truth is subjective; some truths are objective and independent of individual perception.
Divine Revelation and Accuracy
- Divine revelation addresses the subjectivity problem because God ensures accurate transmission.
- Jesus' validation of Moses' writings as divinely inspired supports their accuracy.
Joseph Smith's Revelations vs. Moses'
- Joseph Smith's revelations lack external validation, unlike Moses's, whose authority is confirmed by Jesus.
- Mormon doctrines contradict biblical teachings, raising questions about their divine origin.