In this podcast, Professor Michael Mann continues to give evidence in his defamation case against writer Mark Steyn and scientist Rand Simberg. Mann refutes allegations of fraud and misconduct in the creation of his Hockey Stick graph and claims financial damage. Simberg's lawyer challenges Mann's claims of suffering, highlighting his glamorous life with trips, film festivals, and parties with Bill Clinton and Leonardo DiCaprio. Stay tuned for a bombshell revelation about Mann's funding.

In this podcast, Professor Michael Mann finally takes the witness box after years of delay. The episode covers Mark Steyn's combative pushback against Mann's lawyer, questions about Steyn's educational qualifications, Mann's claim of reputation damage, defense of the 'hide the decline' email, and the controversy surrounding Mann's remarks and blacklisting of scientists.

Mark Steyn takes the stand in a defamation trial against climate scientist Michael Mann. Mann's false claim of winning a Nobel prize is discussed, as well as the 'Climate Gate' leaks and the refusal to disclose the whistleblower's name. The chapter also covers a reenactment of questioning and an email exchange revealing concerns about reputation damage. The defamation case between Mann and Tim Ball is mentioned, along with a discussion on honorary degrees and the fallibility of science.

The podcast discusses the gripping opening statements in the trial against Michael Mann, including the accusations against him and the defendants' arguments. Mark Steyn's masterclass in oratory and his description of Mann as a fraud is highlighted. The chapter also explores Mann's false claims of winning a Nobel Prize, the association between Mann and Jerry Sandusky, and parallels drawn to Jeffrey Epstein's case.

Podcast delves into Michael Mann's legal battle, including his lawyers' attempts to ban journalists from questioning him. Mark Steyn defends the rights of journalists to ask difficult questions. Bill Nye's presence and controversial views in court are explored. The potential influence of courtroom presence and support for the trial is discussed.

A long-awaited court case examines the clash between climate alarmism and free speech. The trial focuses on the defamation of climate scientist Michael Mann by writer Mark Steyn. The trial's delays and its spotlight on Penn State University and climate science raise intrigue. The podcast follows the courtroom clashes using re-enactments based on actual court transcripts.

Prominent climate scientist Michael Mann is suing writer and broadcaster Mark Steyn alleging defamation. Mann's Hockey Stick graph alleging stable global temperatures for 1500 years due to human industrial activity is questioned by Steyn. The podcast explores the court case examining free speech boundaries in relation to climate change.