Podcast delves into Michael Mann's legal battle, including his lawyers' attempts to ban journalists from questioning him. Mark Steyn defends the rights of journalists to ask difficult questions. Bill Nye's presence and controversial views in court are explored. The potential influence of courtroom presence and support for the trial is discussed.
The encounter between journalists and Professor Mann outside the courthouse sparked controversy and raised questions about free speech and the role of journalists in covering court cases.
The presence of Bill Nye at the trial raised concerns about potential jury influence and highlighted the importance of impartiality in a fair trial.
Deep dives
Jury selection and drama outside the courtroom
The second day of the defamation trial between Mark Stein and climate scientist Professor Michael Mann was mostly occupied with jury selection. However, drama ensued as journalists, including the podcast team, attempted to ask Mann questions outside the courthouse. The encounter turned tense, with Mann's lawyer even shoving one of the journalists. The incident sparked controversy and raised questions about free speech and the role of journalists in covering court cases.
Bill Nye's presence and potential influence on the trial
Bill Nye, known as the science guy, attended the trial on behalf of Michael Mann. Concerns were raised about the potential influence Nye's presence might have on the jury due to his activist stance and large following on social media. The podcast hosts questioned whether this amounted to an attempt to sway the jury and emphasized the importance of impartiality in a fair trial.
Contentious exchanges and clashes in the courtroom
In addition to the outside drama, there were contentious exchanges between the defense and Mann's counsel in the courtroom. Mark Stein, representing himself, spoke up against claims made by Mann's lawyer, stating the importance of free speech and the role of the press. The judge intervened, warning against disruptive behavior in court and ensuring a fair trial. The podcast hosts expressed their intent to correct the record and continue their journalistic coverage of the trial.
Michael Mann’s war on journalism continues as his lawyers demand the court ban journalists from asking him questions. As part of his war, podcast presenters Phelim McAleer and Ann McElhinney became part of the courtroom drama today. Phelim’s questions to Professor Mann outside the courthouse didn’t please Mann or Mann’s lawyers. But does this justify Mann’s lawyer, John Williams, misrepresenting what happened?
You won’t want to miss Mark Steyn’s eloquent defense of the rights of awkward journalists to ask awkward questions. Will we still be allowed to do our journalism? And what is Bill Nye the Science Guy doing in court?
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode