What's Left of Philosophy

Rainer Forst, Kantian critical theorist, discusses his theory of power and reason, examining economic domination, distinguishing power from violence, and the problem of circularity in judging reasons for acting. They explore the role of justification in power dynamics and the principle of generalizability and reciprocity in situations like violence and workers going on strike.

E.P. Thompson, the legendary Marxist historian, discusses time, work discipline, and industrial capitalism. They explore the evolution of time discipline, cultural stereotypes, transitioning from work to leisure, and the negative impact of work patterns. Is laziness a virtue? Tune in to find out!

In this episode, researcher and video essayist John Duncan joins the hosts to discuss the Effective Altruism movement. They critique its individualism, dismissal of historical context, and focus on cost-effectiveness. They also explore institutional connections, systemic change, and the idealism of effective altruism. The speaker argues for addressing systemic issues rather than changing individuals' minds. They further discuss the challenges of rationality, economics in the movement, and upcoming projects by John Duncan.

This podcast discusses the philosophy and practice of Gerrard Winstanley, a key figure in English Revolutionary politics. Topics covered include the abolition of all 'kingly power', the contrast between Winstanley and Thomas Hobbes, the concept of the 'commons', property relations, enemies in Winstanley's vision, and the incompatibility between Hobbes' vision and the emergence of political ideas during the English Revolution.

No episode this week BUT we've got some big news: that's right, at long last, a What's Left of Philosophy live show! Come see us on October 12th at the Free Times Cafe in Toronto, 8pm onward. More details coming soon. Thanks for everything!leftofphilosophy.comMusic: Vintage Memories by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com

The podcast explores the relationship between republicanism and liberalism, discussing Philip Pettit's ideas and how they differ from conventional assumptions. It analyzes the limitations of utilitarianism, examines perspectives on freedom, and explores the interconnectedness of domination and freedom. The episode also delves into the subjective and inter-subjective effects of domination and non-domination.

In this episode, we are joined by Dr. Megan Hyska to discuss her work on propaganda. She takes us through the history of the term propaganda, what makes propaganda a distinctly political concept, and how propaganda helps create or inhibit group agency. She shows why thinking that assumes propaganda can only work by manipulating our irrationality fails to help us see that propaganda can be effective even when it does not trick or deceive us. This is a great episode for those of you interested in the relationships between effective propaganda and social power. Also if you are Hobbesian just wait until you hear what Owen has to say!leftofphilosophy.com | @leftofphilmeganhyska.comReferences:Christopher Lewis and Adaner Usmani, “The Injustice of Under-Policing in America,” American Journal of Law and Equality 2 (2022): 85-106Megan Hyska, (2021) “Propaganda, Irrationality, and Group Agency,” in The Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology, eds. M. Hannon & J. de Ridder: 226-235.Megan Hyska, (2023) “Against Irrationalism in the Theory of Propaganda,” Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 9(2), 303-317.W.E.B. Du Bois, (1926) “Criteria for Negro Art” http://www.webdubois.org/dbCriteriaNArt.htmlAmia Srinivasan, (2016) “Philosophy and Ideology,” Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History, and Foundations of Science 31(3): 371-380.Music:Vintage Memories by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com

On this episode we are joined by Dr. Søren Mau to discuss his new book, Mute Compulsion: A Marxist Theory of the Economic Power of Capital. We talk about why economic power is different than violence and ideology, what’s distinctive about the human being in terms of its metabolic exchange with nature, and what this means for capitalist reproduction and the possibility of its interruption. Speaking of interruptions, we find ourselves subject to reactionary infrastructural violence when the internet crashes mid-conversation, but we manage to recover before long!leftofphilosophy.com | @leftofphil sorenmau.comReferences:Søren Mau, Mute Compulsion: A Marxist Theory of the Economic Power of Capital (New York: Verso, 2023)Music: Vintage Memories by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com

In this episode, we discuss the ideas of economist and political philosopher F.A. Hayek as they appear in his 1944 book The Road to Serfdom. This influential book was written in response to what Hayek saw as the trend towards socialism in the mid-twentieth century and it offers his defense of “classical liberalism.” We examine the political and epistemological premises of Hayek’s theory of liberty and free markets, question his assumptions on human nature and cooperation, and near the end critique his odious conflation of communism and fascism. Say what you will about Hayek: at least he saved us from being subordinated and unfree! ...Right?patreon.com/leftofphilosophyReferences:F.A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom, edited by Bruce Caldwell (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007).F.A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty, edited by Ronald Hamowy (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011).Quinn Slobodian, Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018).Music:Vintage Memories by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com

In this episode we finally get down and dirty with the big dog of Anglophone political philosophy, John Rawls. We discuss his 1993 book Political Liberalism, which expands on his earlier theory of justice to develop an account of the pluralistic tolerance at the heart of a liberal society characterized by the fact of a diversity of incommensurate but reasonable worldviews. We talk about what Rawlsian theory genuinely has going for it, but also pull no punches about the serious theoretical and practical limits to this most careful and aspirationally progressive exemplar of liberal political philosophy. But hey: don’t worry, we can tolerate a good liberal.This is just a short clip from the full episode, which is available to our subscribers on Patreon:patreon.com/leftofphilosophyReferences:John Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993). Music:Vintage Memories by Schematist | schematist.bandcamp.com