Data Science at Home

In this episode I explain the differences between L1 and L2 regularization that you can find in function minimization in basically any machine learning model.  

In the second part of this episode I am interviewing Johannes Castner from CollectiWise, a platform for collective intelligence. I am moving the conversation towards the more practical aspects of the project, asking about the centralised AGI and blockchain components that are essential part of the platform.   References Opencog.org Thaler, Richard H., Sunstein, Cass R. and Balz, John P. (April 2, 2010). "Choice Architecture". doi:10.2139/ssrn.1583509. SSRN 1583509  Teschner, F., Rothschild, D. & Gimpel, H. Group Decis Negot (2017) 26: 953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-017-9531-0 Firas Khatib, Frank DiMaio, Foldit Contenders Group, Foldit Void Crushers Group, Seth Cooper, Maciej Kazmierczyk, Miroslaw Gilski, Szymon Krzywda, Helena Zabranska, Iva Pichova, James Thompson, Zoran Popović, Mariusz Jaskolski & David Baker, Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology volume18, pages1175–1177 (2011) Rosenthal, Franz; Dawood, Nessim Yosef David (1969). The Muqaddimah : an introduction to history ; in three volumes. 1. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-01754-9. Kevin J. Boudreau and Karim R. Lakhani, Using the Crowd as an Innovation Partner, April 2013. Sam Bowles, The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives are No Substitute for Good Citizens. Amartya K. Sen, Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory, Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 6, No. 4 (Summer, 1977), pp. 317-344, Published by: Wiley, Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2264946

This is the first part of the amazing episode with Johannes Castner, CEO and founder of CollectiWise. Johannes is finishing his PhD in Sustainable Development from Columbia University in New York City, and he is building a platform for collective intelligence. Today we talk about artificial general intelligence and wisdom. All references and shownotes will be published after the next episode. Enjoy and stay tuned!

Predicting the weather is one of the most challenging tasks in machine learning due to the fact that physical phenomena are dynamic and riche of events. Moreover, most of traditional approaches to climate forecast are computationally prohibitive. It seems that a joint research between the Earth System Science at the University of California, Irvine and the faculty of Physics at LMU Munich has an interesting improvement on the scalability and accuracy of climate predictive modeling. The solution is... superparameterization and deep learning.   References                   Could Machine Learning Break the Convection Parameterization Deadlock?                                Gentine, M. Pritchard, S. Rasp, G. Reinaudi, and G. Yacalis Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA, Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA, Faculty of Physics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany            

Humans seem to have reached a cross-point, where they are asked to choose between functionality and privacy. But not both. Not both at all. No data, no service. That’s what companies building personal finance services say. The same applies to marketing companies, social media companies, search engine companies, and healthcare institutions. In this episode I speak about the reasons to aggregate data for precision medicine, the consequences of such strategies and how can researchers and organizations provide services to individuals while respecting their privacy.  

Attacking deep learning models Compromising AI for fun and profit   Deep learning models have shown very promising results in computer vision and sound recognition. As more and more deep learning based systems get integrated in disparate domains, they will keep affecting the life of people. Autonomous vehicles, medical imaging and banking applications, surveillance cameras and drones, digital assistants, are only a few real applications where deep learning plays a fundamental role. A malfunction in any of these applications will affect the quality of such integrated systems and compromise the security of the individuals who directly or indirectly use them. In this episode, we explain how machine learning models can be attacked and what we can do to protect intelligent systems from being  compromised.

Today I am having a conversation with Filip Piękniewski, researcher working on computer vision and AI at Koh Young Research America. His adventure with AI started in the 90s and since then a long list of experiences at the intersection of computer science and physics, led him to the conclusion that deep learning might not be sufficient nor appropriate to solve the problem of intelligence, specifically artificial intelligence.   I read some of his publications and got familiar with some of his ideas. Honestly, I have been attracted by the fact that Filip does not buy the hype around AI and deep learning in particular. He doesn’t seem to share the vision of folks like Elon Musk who claimed that we are going to see an exponential improvement in self driving cars among other things (he actually said that before a Tesla drove over a pedestrian).

In the attempt of democratizing machine learning, data scientists should have the possibility to train their models on data they do not necessarily own, nor see. A model that is privately trained should be verified and uniquely identified across its entire life cycle, from its random initialization to setting the optimal values of its parameters. How does blockchain allow all this? Fitchain is the decentralized machine learning platform that provides models an identity and a certification of their training procedure, the proof-of-train

I know, I have been away too long without publishing much in the last 3 months. But, there's a reason for that. I have been building a platform that combines machine learning with blockchain technology. Let me introduce you to fitchain and tell you more in this episode. If you want to collaborate on the project or just think it's interesting, drop me a line on the contact page at fitchain.io

Cross-posting from Cryptoradio.io Overview Francesco Gadaleta introduces Fitchain, a decentralized machine learning platform that combines blockchain technology and AI to solve the data manipulation problem in restrictive environments such as healthcare or financial institutions.Francesco Gadaleta is the founder of Fitchain.io and senior advisor to Abe AI. Fitchain is a platform that officially started in October 2017, which allows data scientists to write machine learning models on data they cannot see and access due to restrictions imposed in healthcare or financial environments. In the Fitchain platform, there are two actors, the data owner and the data scientist. They both run the Fitchain POD, which orchestrates the relationship between these two sides. The idea behind Fitchain is summarized in the thesis “do not move the data, move the model – bring the model where the data is stored.” The Fitchain team has also coined a new term called “proof of train” – a way to guarantee that the model is truly trained at the organization, and that it becomes traceable on the blockchain. To develop the complex technological aspects of the platform, Fitchain has partnered up with BigChainDB, the project we have recently featured on Crypto Radio. Roadmap Fitchain team is currently validating the assumptions and increasing the security of the platform. In the next few months, they will extend the portfolio of machine learning libraries and are planning to move from a B2B product towards a Fitchain for consumers. By June 2018 they plan to start the Internet of PODs. They will also design the Fitchain token – FitCoin, which will be a utility token to enable operating on the Fitchain platform.