MGTOW Sandman Quotes

One of my friends is dating and he's been noticing something really unusual lately. He was in a long term relationship from the age of twenty six to thirty two and says that his ex was receptive to the love and affection that he gave her. After that relationship he took a break for six months and is now dating women in their mid to late twenties and it seems that many women are afraid of love. They are afraid of men hugging them and showing them affection. They somehow think that it's wrong for men to do that. When he embraces her she don't seem to know how to react to it. That makes her uncomfortable, but sex doesn't. He says that a girl he's seeing now has no problem having sex almost each and every single day but when it comes to him trying to show her affection she does everything she can to detach from him. And this is the third girl in the last year that's been like this. So I spoke to a few other guys and they are saying the same thing. They think it has something to do with the behavior of guys younger then us. Guys in their twenties. Apparently more guys are being direct about what they want. They are approaching ten or twenty girls and telling them they want no strings attached sex and even if they get one or two out of the twenty saying yes then they win. They get to have sex and the girl gets male attention. But if a woman does it enough times then she associates male attention with sex and nothing else. So when she meets a guy that is both sexual and emotional it makes her uncomfortable because she has been conditioned to see men as sexual creatures and not emotional creatures. I spoke about the fact that women don't love men the same way that men love women in my second video on this channel. And apparently loving a woman doesn't matter anymore. Even if a man loves women these days are increasingly unable to recognize loving behaviors or those types of behaviors are making some women increasingly uncomfortable around men. So if you're a man without love in his heart women find you more attractive.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Ever since last fall when I firmly became a mgtow I don't feel love anymore towards women in a romantic sense. I don't lose my cool and become irrational and flood my body with love hormones. I understand that it's my mind that produces those chemicals and my conscious mind is not allowing me to get close to any woman because the danger Will Robinson alarm is going off in my head every time I speak to a woman. I feel like I'm wrangling a bear or a puma rather instead of speaking to a woman. I look into many women's eyes and I can almost see her mind trying to work the angles and trying to read the signals I'm sending out. What I'm trying to say is that I can't fall into romantic love anymore and I have zero desire to do so and I never thought this would happen. I wouldn't have a problem having sex without love now and I'm perfectly fine with that. It's the good women or the mythical NAWALTS that are the worst thing for men because they are the ones that oppress men the most. It's like the good slave owners in the south. They made it tolerable for black people to be slaves and in doing so they prolonged the period of slavery in America. If all slave owners were mean to slaves then I believe the emancipation of slaves would have happened much sooner because there would have been a larger outcry from both whites and blacks in society. My point is that when we acknowledge that the NAWALT exists we are saying that not all women are cruel to men. Am I going too far and saying that not all slave driving women are bad towards men? And I think the influx of women into the MGTOW and men's rights movement is having the effect of keeping the rigged game going a little bit longer. MGTOW will win but every time a woman posts a video saying that she's different it slows down our movement because it gives guys out there that little bit of hope that women are different. I firmly believe that we need to discount what these new MGTOW groupies have to say. It's like they are harpies here to distract us from our goal of going our own way. They flash their tails and men go nuts and men that are in the early stages of digesting the red pill are vulnerable to such behavior.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

"Dear Sandman, I'm hooked on your daily dose of red pills. Keep 'em coming and I think you are a wonderful complement to the first generation of MGTOWs, despite what anyone says. I was wondering if you would do a video on women and their dismissal and/or general treatment of short guys...or more specifically guys who are not tall. I suppose this is a special case of hypergamy, but I find it really strange how important bone length is to so many women. I can't tell you how many dating profiles I've seen where women request that potential suitors be tall, even before other requested attributes like "kind", "motivated", "confident", or "passionate". I've even seen a 5'9" women say she only dates guys who are 6' or taller and went on to say "Sorry shorties!". And in another profile, I saw a 5'2" women say, "It doesn't hurt if you are at least a foot taller than I am." And no, neither of these women were exactly model-esque, shall we say. What's up with this strange obsession, and why is it not spoken of much in the mainstream media? All the best, Vishal. Well Vishal I've got to hand it to you, I've never really thought about this one but I do believe I have an answer for you. I found an online comment at the bottom of an article called "Women's Ugly Truth About Men: There's NO TIME for Short Dudes." One of the women leaving a comment had this to say: "I don't have a problem with short men except for the fact I would die if my son was a short man! For some reason I just expect my son to be a grown man much bigger than his mom (and I'm 5'4-ish.) So think about this Vishal, if a woman marries a short guy and has kids with him and she has a son that's shorter then her, how is that son supposed to take care of his mother when she gets old and frail. Mothers often times treat their sons well when they are younger because they expect that behavior to be there as a form of insurance policy. So essentially a short husband means a short son which means a harder time for a woman in old age. Especially if they want a son to take care of them after their husband dies. That's one way of seeing it anyways. Women's Ugly Truth About Men: There's NO TIME for Short Dudes.http://www.thisisyourconscience.com/2...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

This video is made possible by a donation for Eti. This is your third donation thus far so thank you very much for your help supporting my youtube channel. Eti and I finally agreed that I should cover the topic of herding mentality in women. And Eti wanted me to cover why women get tattoos and do other things in a herd mentality. And I thought I'd take this chance to show some pictures of some the hipster girls in Toronto so everyone can see the quality of the females in some of Toronto's hipster neighborhoods. After seeing these pictures you can probably see why Toronto is considered by some to have the largest number of MGTOWs per capita in the world. The photos in this video are of women in the Kensington Market part of Toronto which by many is considered hipster central in this city. Today it's trendy to be considered a hipster in this city and many women are choosing to fall into the trappings of hipster life. So what does that mean? Well for one it's all about second hand or one of kind clothing, skinny jeans and funky sunglasses. Many hipsters also work hard at looking unkept and the it's almost like some of them try really hard to look like they don't bathe or take care of themselves. Seeing the hipsters kind of reminds of the grunge movement in the early nineteen nineties. When I was in high school in the mid nineteen nineties many of the women in my school were all into Alanis Morisette and Nirvana and they all dressed the same way for the most part. Everyone back then seemed to wear jeans, flanel, tie dye shirts, sandals with socks and play hacky sack. And the men that could grow them had beards. I didn't think to much of it but then when I as in the tenth grade I started noticing that women were starting to get piercings in unusual places. Tongue piercings seemed to be more and more popular and girl after girl started showing up to class barely able to speak after they had their tongues pierced. They all wanted to have tongue piercings and some of their tongues started getting infected and just over half the girls had their piercings removed. But the tattoo culture hadn't exploded like it has today. Back then women would get a tramp stamp above their ass but they didn't get full arm sleeves or cover their entire bodies with tattoos from head to toe like some do today. Women in both movements, the grunge and the hipster movements were also girls from backgrounds that often times had money. There's even the joke going around that many of the hipster guys have large trust funds and they are just playing poor until they grow up and take on real responsibilities.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from E-Chee-Go! And this is what he has to say: "Hi Sandman I discovered MGTOW by stumbling across A Voice For Men, and by chance I found one of your videos and I've taken MGTOW to heart. It's essentially a formal declaration of a man's independence from women and societal norms. As I've said through my rantings in the comments, I've always been single and have never really been involved with women. What used to be a source of shame, I now take it as a badge of pride, as I've never had to deal with the bullshit of dating and women at large. So thanks for offering me red pills. I would like you to cover the idea of women in combat. While most cultures have ultimately decided that women have no place in the brutality of war as combatants, as that has always been the job of the brave or disposable male. Yet women have made their way into war in the past, such as Boudicca, Joan of Arc, as well as the resistance fighters of WW2 in France and Poland, as well as the female Partisans and snipers of the Soviet Union. While the idea of women in combat is hard for the Western world to stomach, Kurdish women are fighting alongside men in Syria. There are a lot of factors that make women in combat controversial, such as them meeting the same standards as men, how they'll interact with each other on the battlefield, as well as the ever present issue of sexual assault and pregnancy? What do you think? Is the world ready to see women butchered the same as men are? And what does this mean for men? Could this be another form of women invading male spaces? Well E-Chee-Go you bring up some very interesting points. I'm going to try and cover some of your points but I think that the wars of the 21st century are going to involve a lot of women fighting in them. The United Statesis pushing to build an unmanned army at this time. We are seeing more unpiloted drones and ground vehicles. Don't believe me then take a look at the article I'm adding in the description below. The article is called "Army prepares to replace thousands of troops with military robots. Government soldiers and private contractor soldiers are about to start losing their jobs in droves.Army prepares to replace thousands of troops with military robotshttp://rt.com/usa/gen-cone-drone-army...​The Private War of Women Soldiershttp://www.salon.com/2007/03/07/women...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Someone once said that when all paths are closed to you the first one that opens up is the one you're supposed to take. That's kind of how I've felt running my own businesses my entire life. Starting your own business from scratch in most cases does not lend itself well to running a family and keeping a woman in your life. Unless of course your partner is also an entrepreneur. But then money can be even more tight if you don't know how to manage it. That's the thing about working for yourself, each and every month you're going to make a different sum of money. There is no steady paycheck, no security and the pace of change is something very hard to keep up with. So unless you want to get into debt really fast you need to watch your money like a hawk and live well below your means. If you don't do that you will find yourself in debt quite quickly. And you need to always keep more money around then you think you'll need. Before the days of corporations most people were crafts people, farmers and artisans. Essentially the economy for the most part was built by entrepreneurs. The only group back then not producing their own goods and wealth were the aristocracy and they would tax everyone and love off the productivity of others. Today companies have found ways to extract peoples productivity for a steady paycheck. You are selling your labor for relative stability. You know how much you will be paid every two weeks so it's easy to get a mortgage, finance a car and get married. A woman can assess how much you make and she can quite often allocate where a good portion of your earned income is going to go, especially if you have a family and she's a bit bossy. But without a steady paycheck relationships with a wife and children become strained and often fail because you're not a steady provider. Another problem with being an entrepreneur these days is that with the internet people in third world countries can sell goods and services into Western economies and you can't compete with them.Live Free Live Rich:https://www.youtube.com/user/LiveFree...​Live Free Live Rich Website:www.LiveFreeLiveRich.comSupport this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

We can also look at women as used car salesmen. But instead of selling used cars they are selling their bodies. More women are having promiscuous sex, riding the cock carousel, getting abortions and sexually transmitted diseases. Not to mention that the more relationships they get into the more emotional baggage they carry with them. So they increasingly have to become better sales people. They have to convince men that they are a good buy and that they are reliable like a good used car. A man going his own way will understand emotional baggage, the cock carousel and will not fall for the same tricks that most mangina blue pill men will fall for. Women are masters at putting up a facade. Women remind me of the fake facades at places like Disney World or Universal Studios or Las Vegas. You walk down a street that's supposed to be a recreation of an actual place but it's a cheap knock off. Many women present themselves as authentic and sincere but they are just like cheap knock off watches or purses being sold on the street corner. If you look past the brand name you'll start to see the cheap stitching and material these defectivegoods are made from and you'll want to go out and find the real thing. The irony is that for MGTOW there are no real woman on the market. They are all seemingly knock off brands. The nawalt is like the priceless Faberge Egg. The odds of getting one into your possession are incredibly rare. You'd have better luck finding one at a garage sale then in an antique shop. And if there are Nawalts out there they were probably taken off the market in their lateteens and early twenties and the odds of them coming to the market again are slim because the bad women drive the good women out of the market. The idea of bad women driving the good out has to do with a reference to the analogy of Gresham s law. The best example of Gresham s law today can be seen in pre 1981 pennies. Pennies before that date were made of copper and those made after are steel plated copper. The copper pennies are worth over two cents if you factor in the copper price, while the steel plated ones are only worth a single cent. So people hoard the copper ones and put the steel ones into circulation. The Romans did the same when they debased their currency. The older denarius coins had actual silver in them while the newer ones were cut with more copper and other metals. So people kept the old and only put the newer money into circulation. This could explain why the same women keep circulating on the dating sites because they have no value. If they did they would have married and found a man a long time ago. So we could say that the less value a woman has in our society the more she gets passed around andcirculated through it. It's a self perpetuating cycle, the more they get passed around the cock carousel the lower their value and the lower their value the more they continue to get put back into circulation. It's basically a self fulfilling prophecy.The Market for "Lemons" : Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanismhttp://www.sfu.ca/~wainwrig/Econ400/a...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Craig wants me to talk about something I mentioned a while back with regards to the ability to shut off my sexuality. When I was in my late teens I was a religious guy. I used to go to Church every week and was a very spiritual guy. At that time it was a crutch in my life. Something to help me deal with the pain of not being understood by other people and my family. My family never pushed me into my faith it and it was something I did of my own free will. And part of my faith was trying to control my own sexual urges and learning to control my desire to control my sexual desires. The priests call self stimulation a carnal desire something that is a biologically driven and something that you couldn't stop because for the most part it's more subconscious then conscious. I didn't believe their reasoning. I thought to myself if I could bring my sexual desires under control then I would prove to myself that the priests were wrong and that it would make be a better believer. I attempted to stop this behavior a number of times before it worked. And when it finally worked I was able to shut down all of my sexual desire and reach what I called a blissful state. Every time I did the deed so to speak I could feel a loss in the spiritual energy and vitality inside. But I remember when I was 19 and I had mastered my sexual desires sitting on the subway and seeing attractive women walk past me and they had absolutely no effect on me. After about 35 days I decided that although I was spiritually fulfilled and feeling confident about myself I was worried about my lack of all sexual desire. I was worried that once I did find a relationship I wouldn't be able to function anymore because I had effectively shut my sex drive down. Sex is a drug and in my case it was replaced by my spirituality and the fulfilling feelings that I received from that.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Garrett and these are the comments and questions he left me. Hi Sandman, While I was growing up I always felt out of place with a lot of things. Religion, education, and social matters. Even though I was a "nice guy" according to everyone, no one wanted to date me. I was too quiet and seemed antisocial, and yet if the females wanted some type of help with homework or tutoring, guess who they ran to? That's right, me. So I started to question if there was anything wrong with me. At 18 I left for the military for an attempt to straighten my mind. My job involved making sure the communications of the unit were up at all times. Being fairly new to the profession I went to my superior for help. I was promptly chewed out for not already knowing what to do. Not even two days later a female solider in my unit and has the same job went up to the same superior and asked a similar question to what I asked. This particular female has been in the job 2 years longer than me, and yet the superior gives her an answer without any consequence whatsoever. This sparked a trigger in my brain. I didn't realize it but at that moment I became a MGTOW. After I left the Army and started to go to college, I started to see more double standards, but one really stood out. I was in my English class where they were talking about objectification of women. During a presentation one of the students say "If a man looks at a woman in a sexual way, he's imposing his power over her. If a woman looks at a man the same way, she's giving her power to the man." While everyone else agreed, my brain immediately rang a alarm that would have been heard around the world. I interrupted by saying "That's a blatant double standard. It's either he or she is imposing their power on the subject in question or they are giving said power to them. It's not the males fault either way." The group went silent and moved on to another subject without any type of rebuttal. That disturbed me deeply, which leads me to my request. If you can talk about blatant double standards and why society accepts those in the benefit of women it would be awesome. Thanks for your comments and questions Garrett I'll try to explain why these double standards play such an important role in our lives.On Stagnation - Bar Barhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FccKT...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from David and this is what he had to say "Hi sandman, Thanks for making my last video, was wondering if you could make another one talking about false rape claims (the statistics regarding them) + the price men pay who are falsely accused, even after they have been proven innocent specifically here in the USA. Thanks -David" The difference between what David wants me to do and what I've done in the past is to present a fact based argument with regards to false rape statistics in the United States. The most important thing is figure out the source of any stats that outline false allegations and outline them in an unbiased way. The source I'm using for this video is actually an article from back in 2009 called "Why It's So Hard to Quantify False Rape Charges. How Often Do Women Women Falsely Cry Rape?" One of the main reasons feminists get away with promoting the idea that there is a rape culture is because there are no stats to back up what they are saying or stats to disprove what they are saying. It's the obscurity and unavailability of information that allows feminists to say what they do without the Men's Rights Movement proving them wrong. The lack of information in this case is like walking into a dark room with cockroaches in it. You don't know how many false allegations there are versus actual rapes. The actual rapes being the cockroaches in this case, just so I don't piss any feminists off. According to this article there were about 200,000 rapes in 2008. So assuming violent crimes have continued trending down today there would be about 180,000 to 200,000 rapes in 2013 with about 20,000 of them being false allegations. And we are not including the statistics for male rape in prison here. Susan Brownmiller wrote a book back in 1975 called Against our Will: Men, Women and Rape. In her book she says she interviews female police officers in New York Cities rape squad and those are the stats she got. But those are not cold hard stats. On the other side of the coin we have a male author Phillip Rumney and he claims the 2 percent isn't an accurate statistic either and he says the false allegations make up 40% of the cases of rape charges being filed. His data is based on the work of EJ Kanin in the "Archives of Sexual Behaviour." Here's a quote from the article: "Kanin looked at 109 reports of rape to police in one small Midwestern metropolitan area over nine years. His pool was small. The police he studied always offered the victim a polygraph—perhaps signaling they doubted her veracity. And Kanin himself "warns against generalizing from his findings." That's what the article says. one hundred and nine people is a very small cross section of the population and polygraph tests can be fudged and don't always hold up. So I'm willing to split the difference and say that 10-30% of rape allegations are false. It's simply impossible to know how many and David I wish I could give you a clear answer because then we would have some hard data to present to feminists and they wouldn't be able to scream rape culture if thirty percent of all rape allegations were fake.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy