MGTOW Sandman Quotes

A few days ago someone sent me a link to an article at the Guardian called "A radical fix to the world's wage gap: why not just pay women more – and pay men less?" by the writer Jessica Valenti. And here's a paragraph from her article: "what if the boldest solution for the wage gap isn’t about raising women’s salaries at all? What if we paid men less? Over the weekend, former New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson – fired in part, she says, over conversations about pay disparity – told a reporter that the best way for newsroom leaders with a limited budget to fix salary inequalities is to “bring the guys down to give a little more to the girls”. “I did that at The Times. No one’s happy to get a cut, but too bad.” Too bad indeed! The Washington Post’s masthead is about to become all-male. The US wage gap has barely moved in a decade. Politicians here are deriding new equal pay laws in midterm campaign ads, and the UK and elsewhere aren’t faring much better even when they do have such laws. Given the sad status of women and work lately, it may be that a little “I don’t fucking care if you like it” is exactly what gender equality needs right now. Some men’s antipathy toward feminism comes from a fear that leveling the playing field will mean taking away from men’s existing power. And for a long time, feminists have been sensitive to that concern, insisting that equality is not a zero-sum game – that there’s enough money, jobs and justice to go around for everyone." That chunk of Jessica Valenti's article should strike terror and fear into the hearts and minds of men working in corporations and government jobs across all western nations. And with Hilary Clinton most likely to be elected as the President of the United States I fear the country may start implementing such insane measures to buy votes and fight a wage gap that was dis-proven a long time ago. How is the government supposed to enforce this law outside of corporate environments and government jobs? If I do a job as a contractor does my client have the right to lower the rate he or she pays me based on the original price I quoted them because I'm a man. And if so then I'll just quote a higher price and to get paid my usual rate.A radical fix to the world's wage gap: why not just pay women more – and pay men less?http://www.theguardian.com/commentisf...Google CEO: Computers Are Going To Take Our Jobs, And 'There's No Way Around That'http://www.businessinsider.com/google...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

"Hi Sandman, How about a video about online dating? Every woman lists the same things: she loves her kid(s) and dogs, and comes off as very negative/leary of men. Why do they put their worst foot forward? Thanks again." Well thanks for your question Zeb. As I've mentioned in videos before women imitate each other and if they hear that a certain style of online personal ad works for one of their friends then they will try the same thing on their account. But right now there's a shift in the way that online dating works. Up until a couple of years ago, online dating was predominantly done the same way it had always been done. Women would post their online ads on websites like Plenty of Fish, Ok Cupid, Lavalife, Eharmony or other similar sites and women would get hundreds of messages from guys and guys would be lucky to get one single response back from one of the dozens or hundreds of women he contacted. In such a scenario the guys would have to spend all the effort to get a connection and a chance to speak to a woman. And women would just sit back and enjoy all of the attention. What I like to call dating two point zero which came out a few years ago includes primarily Tinder and to some small extent Hot Or Not and this new way of dating means that a guy doesn't have to writes a profile and neither does a woman. They both just swipe left for the people they don't like and right for the people they do. And once again guys are effectively bombarding women with attention because most guys will close their eyes and swipe to the right so that they can increase their available pool of women. And the ugly and unattractive women will also swipe to the right for most guys, especially if they are a three or a four, or below. As an experiment, after Lui Marco said that most guys flick to the right for every single girl they see I decided I would do that on Tinder to see what type of results I could get. And sure enough I got some of the most overweight and unattractive women matching me back.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Before I begin today's video I need to let everyone know that it looks like someone "view bombed" my second last video called "Casual Sex Regrets." A lot of the traffic was coming from Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, India, Vietnam, The Philippines, Malaysia and many other non English countries. I kept rotating the video between private, public and unlisted and eventually the views stopped. I have notified YouTube and am waiting for their response. I'm pretty sure that nothing will happen but if it does be aware that there is a link in this video in the description below to my Sandman 2 channel. If for whatever reason I lose this channel my next video will come from there. And if anything happens to my Google adsense account I'll probably just join a network. I guess if you play by the copyright and freedom of speech rules and people still want to stop you they have to get creative. Lets see what happens with this. Right now the video is set to private so I'm not going to be making it public. And the really strange thing is this video is still getting views even though it's private. I've never seen anything like this before. Anyways today's video is brought to you by a donation from Tony and here's what he has to say: "Hi Sandman, when I was a kid there were very few women into sports. Mind you they would play sports but they weren't fanatical about watching the games and the players. Now they are at the hockey games here in Pittsburgh with other female friends as well as baseball and football games. For the life of me I can't figure out why twenty years ago they weren't at the games and now sometimes I see thirty to forty percent of the hardcore fans being female. I'd like your input on this story. Thank You." Well, thanks for your question Tony. I think that there are many reasons why women are more into sports today then they were twenty or thirty years ago. The first reason being that sports culture is similar to gaming and geek culture in that all of these spaces have been inundated by women.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Most men in the manosphere can agree that feminism is negative for men because it promotes female superiority in politics, education, economics and every single aspect of human society. Some would go as far as to say that feminism is gynocentrism revealed in its most naked form and exposed for the entire world to see. Gynocentrism IS covert female nature and feminism is overt hyper female nature. The men's rights movement fights feminism but it embraces gynocentrism by welcoming in women into the movement as well as traditionalism. The MRM only exposes half truths and many men's rights organizations, but not all use women as human shield to protect themselves from unpopular opinions. And at the same time some of the women in such organizations use those organizations to gain status or attention for themselves. It's like two parasites feeding off each other. Or it's like the Polish blanket trick, where you increase the length of a blanket by a foot by cutting a foot off the bottom and sewing it to the top. No offense to Polish men. However, MGTOW on the other hand fights both feminism and gynocentrism or feminism light as I'd like to call it. Gynocentrism is after-all a very large component of traditionalism. Before the industrial revolution, women needed to make themselves out to be fragile or delicate pretty flowers or beautiful jewels in order to avoid many of the backbreaking chores humans had to do before fossil fuels and electricity. They had to cover their bodies in long flowing dresses to protect themselves from the elements. Now that those manual labor chores are much easier to do, thanks due to men and the technology we invented, they no longer need to play up to their fragility. They no longer need to pass themselves off as passive. Instead feminism has made women aggressive with regards to what they want. Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Women it seems often regret having casual sex with men and that regret usually happens the day after. And then women regret being sexually active and then take that regret out on men in the form of false rape allegations and/or sexual assault charges. But what I want to know is why do women regret casual sex in the first place and more importantly why do they take it out on a man? I'm including a link to an article called "The Real Reason Women Might Regret Casual Sex in the description below and here is a paragraph from that article: "The research team found that college-age women are more likely to regret a one-time sexual encounter, whereas men are more likely to regret not taking a sexual opportunity. Women's biggest sexual regrets are losing their virginity to the wrong partner, cheating on a partner or moving too fast sexually. Men, on the other hand, regretted not making a move on a potential partner, and a lack of sexual adventurousness in their younger or single days. Similar patterns held among gay men and lesbians – women were more likely to regret sexual activity, while men were more likely to regret chances not taken." The article also says that there is scientific evidence that negative feelings also create stronger memories. So if a woman feels negative about a one night stand and she regrets it then she's more likely to remember it more intensely. When women regrets a one night stand and takes it out on the man by saying that he took advantage of her, what she's really saying is that she feels bad for letting her hormones in the moment take advantage of her and therefore she getting back at her casual sex partner is one way to take back some of the power she lost by giving away her sexuality cheaply. She probably acted out on subconscious impulses, had a one night stand to someone she probably barely knows and now feels bad about it. Someone has to pay for her feelings of regret and women are often taught that men are disposable. So it's easy to put the blame on a male scapegoat. I also believe that this is natures way of creating buyers remorse in a woman. If she has casual sex and her subconscious mind doesn't think the guy is worthy of having children with the following day then she will regret it.The Real Reason Women Might Regret Casual Sexhttp://www.alternet.org/real-reason-w...The Anatomy of False Accusations: A Skeptical Case Studyhttp://www.centerforinquiry.net/blogs...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Today's video is brought to you by a donation from Kill Joy one nine seven and this is what he has to say: "Hi Sandman, From my personal experience over the past few years with a transgender M2F friend, I have noticed the most dramatic changes in 'her' personality coming about due to her hormone treatment. She had slowly lost her ability to think logically as she did before and 'the change' has now become very emotion drive (becoming hostile at any criticism, breaking into treats over minor issues or events, ect.) as well as changing her mentality to one where she looks at people for their utility value more so than their friendship with her. Seeing this change happen first hand has allowed me to see the development of the female mentality in a compressed time. Two additional questions are how is bisexuality and homosexuality effecting women and MGTOW? Since its offering men alternatives to spending time and money on women and thus giving women less opportunities and more competition. And how has the trans community effected feminism as it opens the "men are evil, women are good by nature" debate up further and puts into question just who will benefit from feminism; those born female or any one identifying as such?" well, thanks for your questions Kill Joy one nine seven. I've already spoken about the gay and bisexual influence of men in the MGTOW movement. In fact I have two videos that I'm linking to in the description called Women Hate Bi Guys question mark and Gay MGTOW. Hopefully you can find answers in those videos with regards to men and their sexuality. But your description of the male to female friend has got to make everyone see that being male versus female has more to do with hormones then anything else. Estrogen, the female hormone allows women to exploit men's strength and Testosterone, the male hormone allows men to be exploited by women. More and more I realize that female nature is nature in the hormonal sense.Women Hate Bi Guys? - MGTOWhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rL0U7...Gay MGTOWhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3LI5...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

If there's any doubt that Toronto, Canada is the undisputed capital of feminism and gynocentrism outside of Sweden then the link I'm including in the description below will prove it once and for all. Apparently women in this city are so bored with their lives that they have turned to policing games like Grand Theft auto five and making sure that people don't create rape hacks for video games. And the story in the video is covered by CityNews one of the main local news stations in the city. They cover this story by interviewing a woman that says that simulated sexual assault happens when your character is locked into place in the game and then the evil gamers do awful sexual things to your character. And now even the Toronto police department is paying attention as more women in this city complain about virtual rape. But what are the police supposed to do? Shut down users in Russia and Asia that are outside their jurisdiction. The whole situation sounds like a gross mismanagement of public resources. Fortunately I have a solution for female gamers. I think that women should fight the problem of male hacking by hacking into the games themselvesand modifying the gamer experience. Anything a man can do a woman can do just as well. So I'm sure there are tons of female hackers out there with computer science degrees ready to fight this online scourge of virtual rape. Right? Well as far as I know most game developers are male and so are most programmers. So even if women wanted to modify these games and fight back there probably wouldn't be enough competent female hackers to fight this. I think to some extent as more women enter gaming world we'll probably see more of this type of behavior.Virtual rape hard to track in online gaming, police sayhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neTTQ...The Horrendous Odds in Online Datinghttp://mgtow1.blogspot.ca/2014/10/the...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

We've all heard that in many jurisdictions lifelong alimony exists regardless of how much money a man makes and financial hardship he may face. But what about lifetime child support? Bernard Chapin covered an article that I'm linking to in the description below called "Spanish man must continue child support to 29-year-old daughter." The youth unemployment rate in countries like Spain, Portugal, Greece and many other European nations is twenty or thirty percent or more in some cases for those people under the age of thirty. And in this case the judge ruled that the father of a twenty nine year old woman must pay her five hundred Euros per month in child support. According to the article, "The judge pointed out that due to the economic situation, and also the fact that the father himself has a good financial standing, he would have to wait until she completes her studies in two years." You can surely bet that such a decision by this judge could set the precedent for this to happen to other men and possibly women in Spain. The judge also said that the plaintiff "appears to have an economical position of relative strength, owning several real estate properties along with several vehicles, including a BMW." So all the men out there listening to this who have finished paying paying child support in Spain, you have to start worrying about it again for your fully grown adult children. In this case The judge further pointed out that the young woman, never having worked, was not entitled to unemployment benefits and that once she has completed her studies, she has more of a chance of finding gainful employment. The man's lawyer said "These rulings are surprising, crazy and not normal. It's absurd.Spanish man must continue child support to 29-year-old daughterhttp://www.digitaljournal.com/news/wo...Being extradited for $2500 child support and my kids are almost 30...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Vx3q...Toronto and Vancouver home prices pass Rome and close in on Parishttp://business.financialpost.com/201...MGTOW: Not All Women Are Like That!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYdbx...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

As I mentioned at the close of yesterday's video another you-tuber named Razor Blade Kandy mentioned that women's minds don't seem to process when a a male is behaving nicely the same way as men do. When he said this is struck a nerve and triggered something in my head to explore the idea of nice guys and why women don't seem to want nice guys even though they say they do. It seems like a contradiction. I believe that many women say they want a nice guy as the ultimate form of shit test. All of those talk shows and behavioral trends that were promoted in the nineteen eighties, nineties and early two thousands where women went on national television and spoke about how their men were bad dead beats and what they really wanted was a nice guy was an attempt to socially condition many men in generation x, myself included into white knights. Many of us were too young to know what a shit test was so when we heard women speak we took them at face value instead of understanding their true motivations. I was too young to even comprehend what a shit test was yet I still passed it subconsciously because I decided not to become a nice guy but instead focused on my outward appearance at that young age. My body and clothing would be the way I conveyed my values and beliefs. Perhaps what I subconsciously understood was that Women will make an acception for nice guys if they have other physical or possibly financial qualities. If they dress well, have nice bodies or have money. When they say I want a nice guy, what they really mean is a nice looking guy. Not a guy that behaves nicely. For many men there is a disconnect or communications issue between behaving nice and looking nice. Most men it seems process the word nice to relate to their behavior instead of their looks. While I was in High School I put most of my effort into my appearance instead of my personality. Both males and females would criticize my behavior me but at the end of the day I would still get girlfriends. whereas the guys with nice attitudes but with an average looking appearance would remain perpetually single. The average looking man with a great personality is on the same level as a fat or overweight woman with a great personality. It doesn't take much if any work for a man to look average.Internet Has Destroyed Gender Dynamics Beyond Repair & It Will Get Worse !!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ELYk...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

"Hey Sandman, I have a YouTube video request. I'm not a MGTOW myself, though since discovering the manosphere I certainly feel like I am one. At first, out of necessity, then out of spite, and now for my own sake. I'm sure you're aware of something in the seduction community known as "oneitis." In order to be a true MGTOW, one must conquer a primal directive, oneitis being the main manifestation of such a thing. What are your personal experiences with oneitis and what advice or insight can you give to guys struggling with oneitis or as I call it "pussysuffering"? Well thanks for your question Volodymyr. Withregards to my own experience with "oneitis" this happened to me for the first time in my life when I was in the tenth grade in high school. I was obsessed with a girl for about six months and I would say that this was my first young love. And after this I never got hung up on a woman until my first real adult love in my mid-twenties but even then I got through the emotional pain relatively quickly after that relationship. But when I was in high school I had both male and female friends that were obsessed with one person for one, two or even three years between the ages of fourteen and eighteen. And the friends that I still know from that time period are still dealing with the consequences of their obsession with one person. The time I spent dating many different girls in high school was usually when my male friends spent obsessing over one woman that wouldn't give them the time of day. And she was probably getting off on it knowing that she had their attention for many months or years. I found that many women like knowing someone cares for them and wants them and it boosts their ego. So oftentimes they don't have the heart to tell the poor schmuck that they aren't interested and let him go on his merry or non merry way.Nine Steps to Avoid neediness and oneitishttp://www.blackdragonblog.com/2012/0...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy