MGTOW Sandman Quotes

Today I'm going to review a book from Bobby Cenoura. He was kind enough to send me my own copy of his book called Male Angst Volume 1 : FML I Always Get "Those" Chicks in quotations. The FML stands for Fuck My Life for those of you that are acronym challenged. So Bobby wants me to do a book review. So here goes. This book is about guys named Reggie and his recounting of courtships with two short term disastrous girls in the past. The first half of the book describes the relationship dealings with a weed head Vietnamese woman, named Linh that owns a nail salon and has an obsessed husband. And the second one is with a Hispanic mother of two with two different baby daddies. The book is a form of personal therapy where the male character regurgitate their fears, objections and rejections onto the reader. I'm not sure why a fictional character needs therapy and I'll go out on a limb here and say that this is more therapy for the author Bobby Cenoura, although I could be wrong. I'm not sure if Bobby "the author" and Reggie "the main book characters" share the same characteristics. Maybe Bobby is telling Reggies story who is actually a friend or a group of friends. But it doesn't matter. This book is essentially the antithesis of fifty shades of grey. I looked on the Amazon dot com link for this book and it says that it's a fictional story based on contemporary male and African American tales. After reading the two stories found in this book I take them as a warning to any man going their own way that our first rule if and when we date is don't date single mothers. Ninety percent of the drama found in this book can be easily avoided by following that rule. But even still reading the drama was entertaining as this book is extremely descriptive. It gives you subtle details behind the characters, motivations and actually reads like a first hand account instead of simply fiction. Sometimes I had a hard time not believing that the main character doesn't actually exist. That's why I keep thinking that he has to be a real person or these have to be the experiences of the author that he's sharing. Anyways, the first half Linh the Vietnamese single mother of two children gets the plaque cleaned off her dirty teeth and her sexual marketplace value increases. And because of that Reggie, the main character says that when a woman gets a boob job and other upgrades for her body her value goes up because more guys then no want women that is custom built and not off the rack. Or a plain Jane. Reggie had great sex with her before the dental work but now would probably have to jump through additional hoops to get what he had before which I presume is the great sex?Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

"Hi Sandman A huge topic of interest, women in male dominated fields. Not sure if you have covered it. Just search "Royal Canadian Mounted Police sets 'ambitious' recruitment target: 50% women" Can you imagine that? In the military I saw one woman for every 50 guys...it was like seeing the inflated egos of online dating 3's and 4's in person. Cocks being thrown at them from all directions. But in the middle of winter when every sane man was wearing a sweater and heavy jacket, they would insist on parading around in a slightly-too-small T-shirt! Can you imagine a guy being in that type of environment, roles reversed? It's everywhere now, even in the trades. Big recruiting drives to get women into welding, electrical etc. WTF? why man? Thanks again, you are doing "gods" work. Opening more eyes means less suffering." Well thanks for your questions Mr. Annonymous. I had no idea that the Royal Canadian Mounted police were interested in making half their new recruits women starting next year. I'm including a link to an article in the description below that discusses what's going on. They outline that they want to have targets in place to raise their number of female officers from roughly twenty percent today to thirty percent by twenty twenty five. The article also mentions that there have been many sexaul harrassment issues with the RCMP or Royal Canadian Mounted Police. And with all of that sexual harrassment going on I'm sure that someone somewhere in that national police force is looking at whatever strategies it can to lower the money they have to pay out due to that harrassment. Girl Writes What mentioned before that once a workplace reaches a rough threshold or ratio of women working in it then male behavior just naturally changes and men start to behave differently due to the number of women in the environment.RCMP parity worthy goalhttp://www.thestarphoenix.com/news/RC...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A couple of days ago Nualaboala sent me a link to an article that I'm adding in the description below. The article is called "Women take more sick days than men" and it's from the Telegraph in the UK. And here's the first paragraph from that article: "Research shows the average man takes a total of 140 days off sick during their career, while women phone in sick 189 times. Despite this, women are more likely to "try their hardest to make it to their desk" and "feel guilty" if they succumb to illness. Male employees, on the other hand, are more likely to be called up by their boss because of their poor track record. Stomach bugs, dizziness and viruses are the most common ailments which strike down the British workforce." So let me get this straight. In Britain male employees take less sick days then their female counterparts yet they are the ones written up and shamed for getting sick in the first place and then being irresponsible enough to not come to work. I didn't think to much about the article over the last few days until I was thinking for a new topic for a mgtow video. And I oddly remembered a video I saw many years ago about the man cold. I'm also adding a link to that video in the description below. I remember watching that video in a room full of about eighty percent women and twenty percent women. The video exaggerates the effects of a cold on a man. I'm sure that men and women feel the pain of getting a cold or the flu the same way. Yet men are shamed for it. We are expected to show up to work even if we can barely stand. Wives shame men for getting sick as well as employers. It's almost like we aren't allowed to feel pain. We are supposed to suck it up buttercup and go about our merry way. When I was younger I completely believed this bullshit about making it to school no matter what and even won the attendance award while I was in middle school.Women Take More Sick Days http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newst...Man Stroke Woman - Man Coldhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbmbM...Truth About Man Coldshttp://www.webmd.com/cold-and-flu/fea...Man flu is no myth as scientists prove men suffer more from diseasehttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/hea...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

"I am a 33 year-old male. At some point, ideally before I’m 40, I want to have a child conceived through egg donation and surrogacy. I want to know your opinion on something. Awhile ago, I discovered a website called anonymousus.org, which is run by Alana S. Newman, who was donor conceived, and is currently an activist against assisted reproductive technology (ART). The website is filled with anonymous personal stories from children who were conceived via egg donation or sperm donation. Most of these children seem to have issues over the manner in which they were conceived. While it is my dream to be a single father, when I read these stories from donor conceived children, I do experience some second thoughts on the subject. Here's my question for you Sandman: Are you concerned over issues your future child may experience over the way he was conceived? I know you plan to keep in touch with the egg donor so that your child knows who the mother is, and that is certainly better than keeping an anonymous relationship. My view on the subject is that assisted reproductive technology exists for socially infertile people (socially infertile referring to people who are unlikely to reproduce the regular way, such as gay couples, socially inept single people, or even single people by choice). And I’ve heard it argued that, “A mother and a father is preferable to one parent, and even though it’s not necessarily your fault that you’re socially infertile, your child shouldn’t have to suffer for it by not having a mother, so it is unethical for you to conceive a child using an egg donor. You are violating that child’s right to have two parents.” An argument I’ve heard in response is, “Well, if it’s unethical to conceive a child without a mother because children with two parents statistically do better than children with one parent, then let’s talk about the African-American population as an analogy. Statistically, black people don’t do as well as white people do. One out of every three black men will go to prison in their lifetime. Black people are also less likely to go to college. Black people have to deal with a lot of racism. Clearly, black people face a lot of challenges in life that white people generally don’t face, so it would arguably be preferential to be born as a white person instead of a black person. So by the same logic, wouldn’t it be unethical for black people to reproduce because they’re having children who aren’t white and therefore will face more challenges in life?” I believe everybody should be treated equally in regards to reproduction, whether they are socially infertile, black, white, gay, married, single, etc. The resulting child is no worse off by luck of the draw than any child born to less than optimal circumstances.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Hi Sandman, I was wondering if you could do a video on the effects of taking the Red Pill. I was hoping you could explain a little bit on the change a man goes through once taking the red pill. For me two big changes have come, one is compassion for my fellow man, and the second is letting go and holding NO attachments. recently I lost a gay friend I had because I spoke out about the gynocentric crap men deal with inn today's culture and I also lost my dads brother who had a sex change a few years ago and is not trying to go back to being a man because he was trying to convince me I was an angry little man whom hates women. I was unable to get through to him why I have NO reason to trust any women. He then shut down completely when I brought up how my mother DESTROYED him (my dad and his brother) when she divorced him back in 1994 through false accusations, child custody battles, destroying his credit before divorcing him, putting him thousands in debt, ect. was wondering if you would talk about this and explain further as well." Well thanks for your questions David. Well for most men the first effect of taking the red pill is going through red pill rage. And I don't want to rehash that topic so I'm adding a link to that particular video in the description below. As for the changes you've gone through David these are very typical social changes. You are standing up to your aunt a former blue pill men turned into a woman as well as a gay guy you were once friends with and they don't accept you. I'm going to step out on a limb here and say that neither of them accept you because they probably both have a gender identity that is more female then male. I don't know how feminine your former gay friend is but I'm guessing he's more feminine then typical male. Anyways, reaching the two of them is pointless. You're better to take that compassion for your fellow men and help those you can reach and not focus your effort on those you can't save. I hope that answers your question? But your other question about how taking the red pill effects men really got me thinking about something I would consider the Red Pill Renaissance.Red Pill Rage - MGTOWhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwXRi...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Why does the existence of men going their own way create an emotional crisis for many women? If we as men take the energy, resources and time that we normally spend on women in relationships and instead choose to divert that energy for our own desires and dreams, don't we have the right to self-determination? If we use our lives to accomplish things on our own or just chill out, why shouldn't we have that right, without some women throwing hissy fits directed at us attempting to shame us back into a relationship or marriage? I've spoken to less then a handful of women in real life and exposed my choice to become a MGTOW with them. I explained to them that I was against feminism and they were happy I was taking a stance against feminism. But when I explained to them that I was a MGTOW the majority of them got angry with me. I could feel the rage and frustration coming from them. And the ones that don't like it have been trying to talk me out of going my own way. Most women in our society have a personal identity that is tied directly to their value as sexual creatures. They value themselves based on men objectifying them. So if men reject the sexual identity of a woman then they are essentially telling them they have no value. And when you tell a woman about the existence of MGTOW you are indirectly attacking their self worth and ego. If you've ever rejected a woman in your own personal life or dumped her then you'll notice how other women also take it as a personal assault on their self worth when one of their friends is dumped or discarded. It's not so much that they hate us for escaping the plantation so much as the fact that we have rejected their female value system and the worship of the golden uterus. Worshiping the vagina is a value system that almost all the women in our society follow. I also believe women hate us MGTOWs because every dollar we keep to ourselves, save or spend on ourselves is directly removing resources from the hands of all women.The Exponential Youhttps://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/e...So, MGTOW's get a lot of hate. Why?http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/co...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A few days ago someone sent me a link to an article at the Guardian called "A radical fix to the world's wage gap: why not just pay women more – and pay men less?" by the writer Jessica Valenti. And here's a paragraph from her article: "what if the boldest solution for the wage gap isn’t about raising women’s salaries at all? What if we paid men less? Over the weekend, former New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson – fired in part, she says, over conversations about pay disparity – told a reporter that the best way for newsroom leaders with a limited budget to fix salary inequalities is to “bring the guys down to give a little more to the girls”. “I did that at The Times. No one’s happy to get a cut, but too bad.” Too bad indeed! The Washington Post’s masthead is about to become all-male. The US wage gap has barely moved in a decade. Politicians here are deriding new equal pay laws in midterm campaign ads, and the UK and elsewhere aren’t faring much better even when they do have such laws. Given the sad status of women and work lately, it may be that a little “I don’t fucking care if you like it” is exactly what gender equality needs right now. Some men’s antipathy toward feminism comes from a fear that leveling the playing field will mean taking away from men’s existing power. And for a long time, feminists have been sensitive to that concern, insisting that equality is not a zero-sum game – that there’s enough money, jobs and justice to go around for everyone." That chunk of Jessica Valenti's article should strike terror and fear into the hearts and minds of men working in corporations and government jobs across all western nations. And with Hilary Clinton most likely to be elected as the President of the United States I fear the country may start implementing such insane measures to buy votes and fight a wage gap that was dis-proven a long time ago. How is the government supposed to enforce this law outside of corporate environments and government jobs? If I do a job as a contractor does my client have the right to lower the rate he or she pays me based on the original price I quoted them because I'm a man. And if so then I'll just quote a higher price and to get paid my usual rate.A radical fix to the world's wage gap: why not just pay women more – and pay men less?http://www.theguardian.com/commentisf...Google CEO: Computers Are Going To Take Our Jobs, And 'There's No Way Around That'http://www.businessinsider.com/google...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

A few days ago someone sent me a link to an article at the Guardian called "A radical fix to the world's wage gap: why not just pay women more – and pay men less?" by the writer Jessica Valenti. And here's a paragraph from her article: "what if the boldest solution for the wage gap isn’t about raising women’s salaries at all? What if we paid men less? Over the weekend, former New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson – fired in part, she says, over conversations about pay disparity – told a reporter that the best way for newsroom leaders with a limited budget to fix salary inequalities is to “bring the guys down to give a little more to the girls”. “I did that at The Times. No one’s happy to get a cut, but too bad.” Too bad indeed! The Washington Post’s masthead is about to become all-male. The US wage gap has barely moved in a decade. Politicians here are deriding new equal pay laws in midterm campaign ads, and the UK and elsewhere aren’t faring much better even when they do have such laws. Given the sad status of women and work lately, it may be that a little “I don’t fucking care if you like it” is exactly what gender equality needs right now. Some men’s antipathy toward feminism comes from a fear that leveling the playing field will mean taking away from men’s existing power. And for a long time, feminists have been sensitive to that concern, insisting that equality is not a zero-sum game – that there’s enough money, jobs and justice to go around for everyone." That chunk of Jessica Valenti's article should strike terror and fear into the hearts and minds of men working in corporations and government jobs across all western nations. And with Hilary Clinton most likely to be elected as the President of the United States I fear the country may start implementing such insane measures to buy votes and fight a wage gap that was dis-proven a long time ago. How is the government supposed to enforce this law outside of corporate environments and government jobs? If I do a job as a contractor does my client have the right to lower the rate he or she pays me based on the original price I quoted them because I'm a man. And if so then I'll just quote a higher price and to get paid my usual rate.A radical fix to the world's wage gap: why not just pay women more – and pay men less?http://www.theguardian.com/commentisf...Google CEO: Computers Are Going To Take Our Jobs, And 'There's No Way Around That'http://www.businessinsider.com/google...Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

"Hi Sandman, How about a video about online dating? Every woman lists the same things: she loves her kid(s) and dogs, and comes off as very negative/leary of men. Why do they put their worst foot forward? Thanks again." Well thanks for your question Zeb. As I've mentioned in videos before women imitate each other and if they hear that a certain style of online personal ad works for one of their friends then they will try the same thing on their account. But right now there's a shift in the way that online dating works. Up until a couple of years ago, online dating was predominantly done the same way it had always been done. Women would post their online ads on websites like Plenty of Fish, Ok Cupid, Lavalife, Eharmony or other similar sites and women would get hundreds of messages from guys and guys would be lucky to get one single response back from one of the dozens or hundreds of women he contacted. In such a scenario the guys would have to spend all the effort to get a connection and a chance to speak to a woman. And women would just sit back and enjoy all of the attention. What I like to call dating two point zero which came out a few years ago includes primarily Tinder and to some small extent Hot Or Not and this new way of dating means that a guy doesn't have to writes a profile and neither does a woman. They both just swipe left for the people they don't like and right for the people they do. And once again guys are effectively bombarding women with attention because most guys will close their eyes and swipe to the right so that they can increase their available pool of women. And the ugly and unattractive women will also swipe to the right for most guys, especially if they are a three or a four, or below. As an experiment, after Lui Marco said that most guys flick to the right for every single girl they see I decided I would do that on Tinder to see what type of results I could get. And sure enough I got some of the most overweight and unattractive women matching me back.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy

Before I begin today's video I need to let everyone know that it looks like someone "view bombed" my second last video called "Casual Sex Regrets." A lot of the traffic was coming from Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, India, Vietnam, The Philippines, Malaysia and many other non English countries. I kept rotating the video between private, public and unlisted and eventually the views stopped. I have notified YouTube and am waiting for their response. I'm pretty sure that nothing will happen but if it does be aware that there is a link in this video in the description below to my Sandman 2 channel. If for whatever reason I lose this channel my next video will come from there. And if anything happens to my Google adsense account I'll probably just join a network. I guess if you play by the copyright and freedom of speech rules and people still want to stop you they have to get creative. Lets see what happens with this. Right now the video is set to private so I'm not going to be making it public. And the really strange thing is this video is still getting views even though it's private. I've never seen anything like this before. Anyways today's video is brought to you by a donation from Tony and here's what he has to say: "Hi Sandman, when I was a kid there were very few women into sports. Mind you they would play sports but they weren't fanatical about watching the games and the players. Now they are at the hockey games here in Pittsburgh with other female friends as well as baseball and football games. For the life of me I can't figure out why twenty years ago they weren't at the games and now sometimes I see thirty to forty percent of the hardcore fans being female. I'd like your input on this story. Thank You." Well, thanks for your question Tony. I think that there are many reasons why women are more into sports today then they were twenty or thirty years ago. The first reason being that sports culture is similar to gaming and geek culture in that all of these spaces have been inundated by women.Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/mgtow/donationsAdvertising Inquiries: https://redcircle.com/brandsPrivacy & Opt-Out: https://redcircle.com/privacy