
Stanislav Krapivnik
Former U.S. Army officer and military-political expert originally from Lugansk, now based in Russia, providing frontline observations and analysis about the Ukraine conflict and Russian societal shifts.
Top 3 podcasts with Stanislav Krapivnik
Ranked by the Snipd community

9 snips
Nov 22, 2025 • 33min
Next US War Will Be DEVASTATING | Stanislav Krapivnik
Stanislav Krapivnik, a former U.S. Army officer and supply chain executive, shares his insights on rising U.S. military tensions with Venezuela and Nigeria. He critiques the rationale behind U.S. naval buildup, questioning claims about drug trafficking and religious protection. Krapivnik warns of potential escalation mirroring Vietnam, suggesting that a conflict in Venezuela might serve as a distraction from failures in Ukraine. He highlights the geopolitical motives tied to resources, illustrating how Trump's need for quick victories shapes current military policy.

Dec 16, 2025 • 1h 4min
Stanislav Krapivnik: Russia's Permanent Divorce from Europe
In this engaging discussion, Stanislav Krapivnik, a former US Army officer and military-political expert from Lugansk, analyzes the transformative impact of the Ukraine conflict on Russia. He highlights the dynamics of attrition warfare, the complexities of European involvement, and the morale among Russian troops. Krapivnik also argues that the war has spurred a civilizational shift, pushing Russia away from the West. He stresses the risks of escalation if Europe intervenes and critiques the superficial nature of current diplomatic efforts.

Nov 25, 2025 • 59min
Stanislav Krapivnik: Peace Agreement is Impossible Without Trust
Stanislav Krapivnik, a former U.S. Army officer turned military-political analyst based in Russia, shares his insights on NATO-Russia tensions. He emphasizes that current peace proposals mainly favor the West, often demanding Russian capitulation without real guarantees. Krapivnik describes Ukraine's role as a Western proxy and the West's strategic goals to weaken Russia. He warns that distrust and historical grievances complicate negotiations, while escalating military risks could lead to dire consequences.


