Sheera Frenkel, a technology correspondent for The New York Times, dives into the uproar surrounding AI companies appropriating creative works without consent. She discusses the feelings of exploitation among authors, comedians, and fan fiction writers as their content feeds AI systems. Frenkel highlights notable lawsuits, including one by Sarah Silverman, and the deepening divide between human creativity and AI output. The conversation reflects a growing demand for control over original works in an increasingly digital landscape.

Sheera Frenkel, a tech reporter for the New York Times and co-author of a book about Facebook, dives into the dramatic shift at Meta led by Mark Zuckerberg. They discuss Zuckerberg's embrace of a more masculine corporate culture while addressing the reduction of female representation. The conversation reveals Meta's controversial decisions, like dismantling the fact-checking program and rethinking content moderation amidst misinformation crises. Frenkel also highlights the challenges Zuckerberg faces from public scrutiny and internal dissent.

New York Times reporter Sheera Frenkel and science correspondent Geoff Brumfiel discuss how Israel is using facial recognition software in Gaza. They explore the implementation of the system, privacy concerns, partnership with private companies, and the use of Google Photos for efficient face recognition in hostage situations.

Sheera Frenkel, a New York Times tech reporter and co-author of a book on Facebook, dives deep into Mark Zuckerberg's recent transformations at Meta. She discusses Zuckerberg's controversial pivot on free speech, moving away from content moderation in the face of misinformation. The conversation uncovers the tension between his libertarian views and the company's responsibility amid changing political dynamics. Frenkel also highlights the implications of Meta's evolving corporate culture and Zuckerberg's efforts to manage his public image after the Cambridge Analytica scandal.

Sheera Frenkel, a New York Times tech reporter and co-author of a book about Facebook, dives into the dramatic shift in Mark Zuckerberg's approach to misinformation at Meta. The discussion reveals his controversial decision to remove fact-checking, advocating for user self-moderation amid declining support for diversity initiatives. Frenkel also explores Zuckerberg's evolving stance on free speech and the complexities of his leadership during tumultuous social events, shedding light on the intersection of technology and politics.

Sheera Frenkel, a tech reporter for the New York Times, joins the podcast to discuss Hamas' effective use of social media during the war. They explore the impact of social media on information sharing in Gaza and the challenges faced by journalists. They also delve into the efforts of social media platforms in combating harmful content and the creation of echo chambers that perpetuate narratives.

Frances Haugen, a former Facebook product manager who leaked internal documents, shares her shocking insights into the social media giant's practices. Joined by Sheera Frenkel, a technology reporter from The New York Times, they discuss Haugen's testimony revealing how Facebook prioritizes profit over user safety, particularly affecting teens on Instagram. The conversation also dives into the ethical dilemmas of social media, the urgent call for regulatory reforms, and the need to overhaul Facebook's harmful algorithms to protect users.

Sheera Frenkel and Cecilia Kang, New York Times journalists and co-authors of "An Ugly Truth: Inside Facebook’s Battle for Domination," dive into Facebook's leadership challenges amid increasing regulatory scrutiny. They discuss Mark Zuckerberg's control and the internal dynamics shaped by misinformation and accountability. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of corporate domination, U.S.-China tech regulations, and the urgent need for effective legislation in the digital age.

After the attack on the Capitol, social media platforms sprang into action, deleting the accounts of agitators.Without a central place to congregate, groups have splintered off into other, darker corners of the internet. That could complicate the efforts of law enforcement to track their plans.We ask whether the crackdown on social media has reduced the risk of violence — or just made it harder to prevent.Guest: Sheera Frenkel, a cybersecurity reporter for The New York Times. For an exclusive look at how the biggest stories on our show come together, subscribe to our newsletter. You can read the latest edition here.Background reading: In the days since rioters stormed Capitol Hill, fringe groups like armed militias, QAnon conspiracy theorists and far-right supporters of President Trump have vowed to continue their fight in hundreds of conversations on a range of internet platforms.Amazon, Apple and Google have cut off Parler, all but killing the service just as many conservatives were seeking alternatives to Facebook and Twitter.For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily  Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

This episode contains strong language. The pro-Trump mob that stormed the Capitol on Wednesday made their plans in plain sight. They organized on social media platforms and spoke openly of their intentions to occupy the Capitol.But leaders in Washington opted for a modest law enforcement presence. In the aftermath, those security preparations are attracting intense scrutiny.Today, we explore how the events of Jan. 6 could have happened.Guest: Sheera Frenkel, who covers cybersecurity for The New York Times; Zolan Kanno-Youngs, a homeland security correspondent for The Times. For an exclusive look at how the biggest stories on our show come together, subscribe to our newsletter. You can read the latest edition here.Background reading: Inside Trump supporters’ online echo chambers, the chaos of Jan. 6 could be seen coming.Failures by the police have spurred resignations and complaints of double standards.During the storming of the Capitol, social media sites were used by the mob to share information, including directions on which streets to take to avoid the police and which tools to bring to help pry open doors.For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.