Jay Willis, Editor-in-chief of Balls and Strikes, discusses the SCOTUS case on Trump's immunity and its implications on the 2024 election. Also, the court's conservative justices express skepticism about an Idaho abortion law. Biden signs foreign aid package, TikTok ban bill. UN calls for investigation into mass graves in Gaza.

Join hosts Jay Willis, a prominent voice from Balls & Strikes, and journalist Josie Duffy Rice as they dissect the recent election results and the implications for the Democratic Party. They analyze Kamala Harris's campaign missteps and the influence of media on political narratives. With humor and insight, they tackle the challenges posed by a conservative Supreme Court and urge for grassroots organizing. Amidst political despair, they emphasize the importance of community and joy in the fight for change.

The podcast discusses Trump's legal battles to stay on the Colorado ballot, critiquing the Supreme Court's decision. Topics include Justice Amy Coney Barrett's concurrence, dissent from liberal justices, and the lack of consequences for insurrectionist actions. The episode concludes with banter with guest Jay Willis and promotions for social media and Patreon.

Jay Willis, editor-in-chief of Balls & Strikes, dives into Elon Musk's deepening ties with Trump, exploring how Musk's right-wing media habits shape his political stance. Investigative reporter Phoebe Petrovic sheds light on the dark rise of Christian nationalism and its grip on the 2024 election. They discuss the alarming normalization of hate at political rallies and the serious threats to election integrity in America. The fusion of fringe extremism with traditional Republican values raises troubling questions about the future of U.S. democracy.

Jay Willis, editor-in-chief of Balls & Strikes, discusses the potential harm the conservative supermajority of the Supreme Court can cause. Topics include eliminating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, rolling back the Chevron deference precedent, the implications for the federal government, the Loper-Brite case, the chaos of individual judge rulings, and concerns about misinterpretation of the Supreme Court's moderating stance.