5-4 The DOGE Cases
Jun 17, 2025
Join Jay Willis, a legal expert from Balls and Strikes, and journalist Josie Duffy Rice as they delve into the controversial Supreme Court decisions surrounding the Department of Government Efficiency's access to Social Security data. They humorously navigate the absurdities of the situation while highlighting serious privacy concerns. The duo critiques the prioritization of government efficiency over democratic values and discusses the urgent need for long-term thinking in data governance. Expect insights and laughs as they unpack the perilous implications of these legal decisions.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Unchecked Social Security Data Access
- The Supreme Court gave DOGE unchecked access to sensitive Social Security data without full legal analysis.
- This risks irreversible privacy breaches since data, once released, cannot be reclaimed.
Double Standards for Trump Cases
- The Supreme Court shows favoritism towards Trump administration requests without requiring typical legal standards.
- This creates a double standard undermining fairness in judicial decisions.
DOGE's Unfettered Data Demands
- DOGE seeks complete access to Social Security data without disclosing reasons or following normal protocols.
- This reflects arrogance and disregard for privacy safeguards and legal procedures.