Ian Millhiser

Susan B. Glasser, a staff writer for The New Yorker known for her political insights, and Ian Millhiser, Vox's legal correspondent focusing on the Supreme Court, delve into the shifting political landscape surrounding Donald Trump's second inauguration. They discuss how this inauguration starkly contrasts with the first, reflecting on political engagement and the evolving influence of Trumpism. Millhiser also highlights a crucial Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, revealing its implications for executive power and potential abuse in future administrations.

Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent at Vox covering the Supreme Court, and Heather Somerville, a national security and technology reporter for The Wall Street Journal, dive deep into the TikTok ban case. They discuss how this ban raises critical questions about free speech and ownership rights. The conversation spans U.S.-China tensions, national security fears over data privacy, and the competitive threats posed by Chinese tech firms. Millhiser and Somerville offer insight into the broader implications for American businesses and the future of digital platforms.

Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent at Vox with a focus on courts and law, dives into the Supreme Court's consideration of Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood in South Carolina. He discusses the surprising journey this case took to reach the highest court despite legal precedents against defunding. The conversation touches on political influences affecting judicial decisions, the implications for healthcare access, and patients’ rights in the context of significant state actions. Millhiser unpacks the complexities of this legal battle and what it means for abortion rights.

Ian Millhiser, a Vox writer and expert on the Supreme Court, discusses the court's recent significant shifts. He analyzes how rulings are reshaping federal agency power, particularly the overruling of the Chevron doctrine. Millhiser raises alarms about the court's increasing involvement in trivial legal matters and its implications for governance. Additionally, he highlights the trend of citizens turning to the Supreme Court for disputes with federal agencies, stressing the need for informed voter influence over judicial decisions.

Kate Shaw, a law professor and co-host of Strict Scrutiny, and Ian Millhiser, Vox's Supreme Court correspondent, dive into the tense relationship between Donald Trump and the judiciary. They discuss Trump's legal setbacks and his threats to impeach judges. The conversation sheds light on the balance of power between branches of government, the unusual involvement of Chief Justice Roberts in political matters, and the shifting loyalties among justices, particularly focusing on Amy Coney Barrett's judicial independence amidst Republican expectations.

In this insightful discussion, Christian Paz, Vox correspondent, analyzes the surprising shift of Latino voters and what it means for the Democratic Party. Ian Millhiser, Supreme Court expert, breaks down the legal challenges Trump faces, particularly the Supreme Court's immunity ruling. Zack Beauchamp provides a critical look at voters' dissatisfaction and the potential fallout from Trump's agenda. Together, they unravel the complex political landscape following the election, addressing the implications for democracy and future leadership.

Joining the conversation are Christian Paz, a Vox correspondent breaking down election results, Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent interpreting Supreme Court implications, and Zack Beauchamp, who analyzes Republican dynamics and Trump's future policies. They dive into the surprising rightward shift of Latino voters and the implications for the Democratic Party. The panel discusses Trump’s legal challenges, the unpredictable impact of his proposed agenda, and how shifting voter sentiments shape the political landscape ahead.

Vox Senior Correspondent Ian Millhiser discusses the Supreme Court case on criminalizing homelessness, exploring legal complexities, Eighth Amendment debates, and policy implications. The podcast delves into the Court's role in addressing societal issues and the need for legislative actions to combat housing shortages.

Ian Millhiser, Vox’s Supreme Court correspondent, delves into the significance of the Court's new session. He discusses the risks to democracy posed by upcoming cases like Moore v. Harper, highlighting its potential effects on electoral integrity. Millhiser reflects on the historical context of Bush v. Gore and connects it to contemporary voting rights issues. He also emphasizes the critical cases that could reshape democracy and the troubling implications of the Court's recent conservative rulings on marginalized communities.

Ian Millhiser, a Senior correspondent at Vox specializing in legal issues, dives deep into the looming Supreme Court case, Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic. He discusses how the political landscape influences judicial decisions, particularly regarding Medicaid funding for essential healthcare. Millhiser highlights the far-reaching implications this case could have on abortion rights and women's health in America. With Planned Parenthood's viability at stake, the conversation tackles the intersection of law, politics, and reproductive rights, all under the Supreme Court's scrutiny.