Ian Millhiser

Susan B. Glasser, a staff writer for The New Yorker known for her political insights, and Ian Millhiser, Vox's legal correspondent focusing on the Supreme Court, delve into the shifting political landscape surrounding Donald Trump's second inauguration. They discuss how this inauguration starkly contrasts with the first, reflecting on political engagement and the evolving influence of Trumpism. Millhiser also highlights a crucial Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, revealing its implications for executive power and potential abuse in future administrations.

Ian Millhiser, a Supreme Court expert from Vox, and Elizabeth Goytin, co-director at the Brennan Center’s Liberty and National Security Program, delve into the unprecedented use of emergency powers by President Trump. They discuss the implications of his emergency declarations, particularly how they've impacted trade and immigration. The conversation also explores ongoing legal battles over the legitimacy of these actions and raises critical questions about the future of presidential powers and the need for legislative reform to prevent abuses.

Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent at Vox covering the Supreme Court, and Heather Somerville, a national security and technology reporter for The Wall Street Journal, dive deep into the TikTok ban case. They discuss how this ban raises critical questions about free speech and ownership rights. The conversation spans U.S.-China tensions, national security fears over data privacy, and the competitive threats posed by Chinese tech firms. Millhiser and Somerville offer insight into the broader implications for American businesses and the future of digital platforms.

Mark Joseph Stern, a legal writer for Slate and co-host of the SCOTUS podcast, teams up with Ian Millhiser, Vox's Supreme Court correspondent, to dive into the intriguing intersection of pornography and the law. They discuss the Supreme Court's history with porn cases and the unusual practice of justices having to watch it in the past. They also tackle contemporary issues like age verification laws, balancing child protection with free speech, and the evolving landscape of First Amendment protections concerning sexual content.

Ian Millhiser, a keen observer of Supreme Court dynamics and law for Vox, joins to discuss the controversial confirmation of Emil Bove, a judge closely tied to Trump. They dive into how such political connections shape judicial appointments and what that could mean for future Supreme Court nominations. Millhiser highlights the increasing use of the 'shadow docket' under Trump, raising concerns about partisanship. The conversation blends humor with insightful commentary on the implications for justice and democracy.

Kate Shaw, a law professor and co-host of Strict Scrutiny, and Ian Millhiser, Vox's Supreme Court correspondent, dive into the tense relationship between Donald Trump and the judiciary. They discuss Trump's legal setbacks and his threats to impeach judges. The conversation sheds light on the balance of power between branches of government, the unusual involvement of Chief Justice Roberts in political matters, and the shifting loyalties among justices, particularly focusing on Amy Coney Barrett's judicial independence amidst Republican expectations.

Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent at Vox with a focus on courts and law, dives into the Supreme Court's consideration of Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood in South Carolina. He discusses the surprising journey this case took to reach the highest court despite legal precedents against defunding. The conversation touches on political influences affecting judicial decisions, the implications for healthcare access, and patients’ rights in the context of significant state actions. Millhiser unpacks the complexities of this legal battle and what it means for abortion rights.

Ian Millhiser, a Vox writer and expert on the Supreme Court, discusses the court's recent significant shifts. He analyzes how rulings are reshaping federal agency power, particularly the overruling of the Chevron doctrine. Millhiser raises alarms about the court's increasing involvement in trivial legal matters and its implications for governance. Additionally, he highlights the trend of citizens turning to the Supreme Court for disputes with federal agencies, stressing the need for informed voter influence over judicial decisions.

In this insightful discussion, Christian Paz, Vox correspondent, analyzes the surprising shift of Latino voters and what it means for the Democratic Party. Ian Millhiser, Supreme Court expert, breaks down the legal challenges Trump faces, particularly the Supreme Court's immunity ruling. Zack Beauchamp provides a critical look at voters' dissatisfaction and the potential fallout from Trump's agenda. Together, they unravel the complex political landscape following the election, addressing the implications for democracy and future leadership.

Joining the conversation are Christian Paz, a Vox correspondent breaking down election results, Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent interpreting Supreme Court implications, and Zack Beauchamp, who analyzes Republican dynamics and Trump's future policies. They dive into the surprising rightward shift of Latino voters and the implications for the Democratic Party. The panel discusses Trump’s legal challenges, the unpredictable impact of his proposed agenda, and how shifting voter sentiments shape the political landscape ahead.