Today, Explained
47
Jan 20, 2025
Susan B. Glasser, a staff writer for The New Yorker known for her political insights, and Ian Millhiser, Vox's legal correspondent focusing on the Supreme Court, delve into the shifting political landscape surrounding Donald Trump's second inauguration. They discuss how this inauguration starkly contrasts with the first, reflecting on political engagement and the evolving influence of Trumpism. Millhiser also highlights a crucial Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity, revealing its implications for executive power and potential abuse in future administrations.
29:13
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The 2025 inauguration highlights a shift in public sentiment, with reduced attendance and excitement compared to 2016, indicating evolving political engagement.
- A recent Supreme Court ruling providing Trump with substantial legal immunity raises serious concerns about the potential for unchecked presidential power.
Deep dives
A Stark Contrast in Inaugural Atmosphere
The 2025 inauguration is marked by a significant contrast to the 2016 event, highlighting a shift in public sentiment and attendance. In 2016, the atmosphere was filled with apprehension and uncertainty, as evidenced by George W. Bush’s candid remark to Hillary Clinton, describing the inauguration as 'weird'. This year, the lack of a large public presence and excitement raises questions about the future of Trump's presidency and the path of the Republican Party. The absence of major protests or a unified resistance indicates a normalization of Trump's political presence, drawing attention to how public engagement has evolved over the years.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
