Akhil Reed Amar

Akhil Reed Amar, a Yale constitutional law professor and author, discusses America's 250th birthday with a focus on national pride and achievements. He highlights the contrasts between current sentiments and historical milestones, including the Declaration of Independence penned by Jefferson. The conversation dives into the lives of key figures like Adams and Washington, exploring their contributions amidst the backdrop of slavery's contradictions. Amar emphasizes the rich history of American ideals, the evolution of constitutional narratives, and the enduring significance of free speech.

Akhil Reed Amar, a Yale Law professor and author, and Carol Anderson, an expert in African American Studies at Emory, explore the Electoral College's origins and significance. They dive into its historical roots, revealing how compromises over slavery influenced its creation. The discussion highlights the Electoral College's role in balancing state power and the ongoing debates surrounding its impact on democracy. Listeners gain insights into the complexities of electoral representation and the challenges of reforming a deeply entrenched system.

Akhil Reed Amar, Yale's Sterling Professor of Law and a prolific author cited in over 40 Supreme Court cases, dives into the complexities of Roe v. Wade. He discusses why his liberal views align with Alito's draft opinion to overturn Roe. Amar probes the implications for abortion rights in America and the heightened need for political engagement from pro-choice advocates. He also offers insights into the cultural dynamics of the Supreme Court, especially in light of recent leaks, and emphasizes the necessity for legal reform over judicial rulings.

Akhil Reed Amar, a Yale University professor, discusses the birth of the U.S. Constitution, challenging common misconceptions and emphasizing the role of national security and geography. He explores the framing of California's Constitution, the compromises of 1850, and the absence of major gold or silver veins in New Mexico. Additionally, he discusses missed opportunities in ending slavery worldwide and the need to understand our national story.

Nine justices hold tremendous power. Advocates on the left see a Supreme Court out of touch with the electorate, obstructed by partisan interests, and rendered illegitimate by years of controversial appointments. But those opposed believe dramatically changing one of the three core pillars of American government would undermine the court’s legitimacy. Intelligence Squared U.S. in partnership with The Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law asks: Should we expand the Supreme Court?  Arguing in favor of the motion is Dhalia Lithwick, legal commentator and Slate's Amicus podcast host with Tamara Brummer of advocacy group Demand Justice. Arguing against the motion is Carter Phillips, a Supreme Court and appellate litigator with Akhil Reed Amar, a constitutional law scholar and professor at Yale University. Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices