Honestly with Bari Weiss The Yale Law Professor Who Is Anti-Roe, But Pro-Choice
11 snips
May 11, 2022 
Akhil Reed Amar, Yale's Sterling Professor of Law and a prolific author cited in over 40 Supreme Court cases, dives into the complexities of Roe v. Wade. He discusses why his liberal views align with Alito's draft opinion to overturn Roe. Amar probes the implications for abortion rights in America and the heightened need for political engagement from pro-choice advocates. He also offers insights into the cultural dynamics of the Supreme Court, especially in light of recent leaks, and emphasizes the necessity for legal reform over judicial rulings.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Alito's Core Argument
- Justice Alito argues that Roe v. Wade should be overturned because it's inconsistent with the Constitution.
- He believes abortion regulation should be returned to elected representatives at the state and federal levels.
Pro-Choice and Anti-Roe
- Akhil Reed Amar identifies as pro-choice, but believes Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional.
- He separates personal views from constitutional interpretation, citing gun rights as another example.
Roe's Constitutional Weaknesses
- Roe v. Wade lacks clear textual basis in the Constitution and contradicts original intent.
- It also clashed with prevailing abortion laws in most states when it was decided.
