What's Happening with Federal Transportation Dollars?
Feb 25, 2025
auto_awesome
Beth Osborne, executive director of Transportation for America and former official at the U.S. Department of Transportation, shares insights on the chaotic state of federal transportation funding amid the recent government upheavals. She discusses the troubling impacts of funding freezes on public transit, biking, and EV infrastructure. Osborne highlights the critical need for equitable funding in rural areas and critiques current transportation policy shifts. She emphasizes grassroots advocacy as essential for defending vital projects in our communities.
The Trump administration's focus on 'efficiency' has led to the freezing and potential loss of transportation funding for crucial projects.
The discussion highlights the importance of grassroots advocacy in influencing transportation policy and ensuring community needs are prioritized.
Deep dives
Challenges of February Weather and Cleverhood's Solution
February weather can be unpredictable and challenging, often requiring appropriate attire for sudden changes, such as sleet and snow. The Rover rain cape from Cleverhood stands out as a versatile option, providing warmth and coverage over regular clothing without the need for extensive winter gear. This adaptability offers users comfort and convenience, especially in colder climates, advocating for practicality over cumbersome snowy outfits. Cleverhood not only assists in staying dry and visible while biking but also supports relevant organizations working towards a better transportation future.
Impact of Administration Changes on Transportation Funding
Recent disruptions in Washington, D.C. have led to significant changes in transportation funding and policy direction. The Trump administration's actions, characterized by a push for 'efficiency,' have resulted in the freezing of legally appropriated funds and a prioritization of projects that align with the new administration's goals. As a result, many established transportation programs face uncertainty, further complicating the already complex landscape of federal transportation policies. This has led to a contentious atmosphere where decisions can affect the future of various transportation initiatives and infrastructure projects across the country.
Consequences of Infrastructure Spending Decisions
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) promised significant funding for both public transit and highways, but it has sparked debate about the allocation of resources and the resultant impacts on emissions and community well-being. While advocates highlighted investment in beneficial projects, critics pointed out that for every dollar invested in transit, four dollars went toward highways, ultimately contributing to rising greenhouse gas emissions. The current funding imbalance has raised concerns about the efficacy of the IIJA in addressing long-standing transportation challenges without perpetuating further environmental harm. Achieving a sustainable transportation future requires a reevaluation of spending practices to prioritize genuinely positive outcomes for communities.
Navigating Transportation Policy and Advocacy
The conversation surrounding transportation policy emphasizes the need for effective advocacy at local and federal levels to influence future decision-making. Stakeholders are encouraged to maintain constant communication with their representatives, ensuring that transportation initiatives remain a priority in legislative discussions. The urgency for grassroots engagement is crucial, especially in light of the shifting political landscape that threatens funding for vital programs. By fostering relationships and showcasing the importance of community-centered transportation projects, advocates can play a pivotal role in shaping a safer and more efficient transportation network.
The Trump administration has upended the entire United States government over the last several weeks, sending Elon Musk and his minions into the guts of pretty much every federal department in a crusade for what they’re calling “efficiency.” Funds that were legally appropriated by Congress have been frozen, and in some cases even clawed back. The battle to preserve all sorts of spending is now in the courts.
What does this all mean for federal funding of public transit, bike and pedestrian infrastructure, and the transition to EVs? And what is DOT Secretary Sean Duffy’s “Woke Rescission Memo”? We talked with Beth Osborne, executive director of the advocacy organization Transportation for America, to help us understand what’s at stake and how we can help defend projects we care about in our own communities. (Spoiler alert: It won’t be easy!)
*** Support The War on Cars on Patreon and receive exclusive access to ad-free versions of regular episodes, Patreon-only bonus content, invitations to live events, merch discounts and free stickers! ***
This episode was produced with support from the Helen and William Mazer Foundation and Cleverhood. Listen to the episode for the latest discount on the best and most stylish rain gear for walking and cycling.
Some terms Beth mentions in the interview that might be unfamiliar:
ISTEA (pronounced ICE-T) is an acronym referring to the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, which fundamentally restructured the way federal transportation funds are disbursed. You can read more about it here. (Brookings)
Justice40 refers to a Biden-era policy initiative aiming to direct 40 percent of federal investments in areas like climate, clean energy, and affordable housing to disadvantaged, disinvested communities that suffer disproportionately from pollution.
This episode was edited by Ali Lemer. It was recorded by Josh Wilcox at the Brooklyn Podcasting Studio. Our theme music is by Nathaniel Goodyear. Transcriptions are by Russell Gragg.