Opening Arguments

OA539: Pablo Escobar's Cocaine Hippos Are People, My Friend (?)

Nov 2, 2021

01:08:39

Creator website

Highlights

AI Chapters

Episode notes

Talk Space

04:39

Is Recognizing Animals as Persons Capable of Raising Rights Claims in Court?

03:15

Dan Tanas and Dantanas in Atlanta

01:55

Introduction

5min

Duck Duck, Duck, Goose - Is This a Fake News Game?

5min

What in the World Are Pablo Hescabars Cocaine Hippos?

1min

The Hippos Are a Dangerous Animal in the World

5min

Is Recognizing Animals as Persons Capable of Raising Rights Claims in Court?

3min

Maldonado's Complaint to the Columbian Government

5min

Are You Saying Thet Hippos Are Interessing Persons?

4min

Defendant's Knowledge and Impressions About Managing the Fertility of the Community of Hippos

2min

Zip Recruiter - The Smartest Way to Hire

3min

10.

Talk Space

5min

11.

Is an Estate Not a Human Being?

4min

12.

The Red Hippo in Columbia

6min

13.

Dan Versus Dananas - The Difference Between a Copyright and a Trademark

5min

14.

Dan Tanas and Dantanas in Atlanta

2min

15.

Macdonald's - Is That the First MacDonalds?

5min

16.

The Final Entile

5min

17.

Tory Negligence vs Contributory Negligence

5min

It's time for a good old fashioned low stakes fun legal deep dive! Get ready to learn what on Earth this episode title even means! Before that, we've got some Thomas was allegedly wrong about duck duck grey duck! And then a wildcard segment about Dan Tana's vs. Dantana's!

Links: Animals Recognized as Legal Persons for the First Time in U.S. Court, Pablo Escobar’s hippos, Maldonado Declaration, Rule 45. Subpoena, 28 U.S. Code § 1782, the motion, Intel Corp v. AMD, 542 U.S. 241, Dan Tana v. Dantanna’s, 611 F.3d 767