Decouple

Engineering State v. Lawyerly Society

Oct 21, 2025
Dan Wang, a research fellow at Stanford’s Hoover History Lab and author of Breakneck, explores the contrast between China as an 'engineering state' and the U.S. as a 'lawyerly society.' He discusses the rise of engineers in China's political landscape post-Mao and how the U.S. shifted towards legalism in the 60s and 70s. Wang shares insights from his cycling trip in Guizhou, the implications of the one-child policy, and China's ambitious infrastructure projects, revealing both the benefits and drawbacks of state control and capacity.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Engineering State Versus Lawyerly Society

  • China became an "engineering state" by promoting engineers into leadership and prioritizing large-scale physical and social projects.
  • The U.S. became a "lawyerly society" where law-centered elites block many large projects, trading construction ability for legal constraint.
INSIGHT

Lawyers Shifted U.S. From Builders To Litigators

  • In the 1960s–70s American lawyers shifted from dealmakers to litigators and regulators, slowing infrastructure projects.
  • Cultural critiques (Rachel Carson, Jane Jacobs) reoriented priorities toward constraints and environmental protections.
ADVICE

Shift From Litigation To Problem Solving

  • Focus on solving current infrastructure and manufacturing problems instead of endlessly litigating past abuses.
  • Law students and regulators should pivot from obstruction to enabling large public projects for housing, transit, and clean energy.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app