This podcast explores the concept of the Leviacene as an alternative to the Anthropocene, discussing the impact of politics and economics on planetary destruction. It delves into human qualities, power dynamics, and technological advancements. The speaker proposes reevaluating the influence of modern states and corporations and questions the idea of solely blaming humanity for the current state of the world. Future scenarios and the importance of reconnecting artificial versions of humanity are also explored.
The Anthropocene implies that human impact reveals negative aspects of humanity, such as insatiable greed and indifference to environmental harm.
Labeling the current era as the Leviathan recognizes that extensive planetary destruction is primarily driven by large-scale political and corporate entities.
Deep dives
The Anthropocene: A Controversial Term
The term 'Anthropocene' is a widely used but contentious term that refers to a proposed geological epoch marked by human activity shaping the planet. It has gained increased usage in recent years, moving beyond the confines of academia and finding its way into various spheres, including journalism, art, and fiction. However, there is disagreement on when the Anthropocene officially began and the extent of its impact. Some geologists argue that the term is being used too loosely, while others believe it accurately represents how human activity has shaped ecosystems, climate, and biodiversity. The broader usage of the Anthropocene implies that human impact reveals negative aspects of humanity, such as insatiable greed and indifference to environmental harm. While geologists focus on the technical aspects, the general usage has moral implications, portraying humanity as a destructive species.
Different Perspectives on the Anthropocene
The Anthropocene can be understood in two main ways: one as a geological term referring to the epoch in which human activity shapes geological markers, and the other as a broader concept reflecting human impact on the natural world. In the geological sense, the Anthropocene is based on conventional markers that allow recognition of previous shifts in geological epochs. The broader usage, however, suggests that the natural world bears human marks in a way that reveals something about us as a species. This perspective implies that humanity is characterized by insatiable greed, selfishness, and indifference to the consequences of our actions. However, critics argue that not all humans are responsible for these negative traits, and that the Anthropocene should not be a collective judgment on humanity as a whole.
The Need for a New Term: The Leviathan
Rather than labeling the current era as the Anthropocene, a more fitting term would be the 'Leviathan.' This term recognizes that the extensive impact on the planet is primarily driven by large-scale political and corporate entities, rather than solely by humanity as a whole. The construction and operation of these leviathans, such as states and corporations, shape the world and leave their markers on the environment. By shifting the focus to the leviathans, it becomes evident that they are artificial versions of humanity, reflecting our need for security and prosperity, but also carrying the potential for environmental destruction. Acknowledging that the leviathans represent a version of us highlights the possibility of reforming these entities to align with human values and foster environmental sustainability.
Overcoming the Challenges of the Leviathan Era
Addressing the challenges posed by the current era, dubbed the Leviathan, requires recognizing that it is a product of a specific version of humanity. Creating a sustainable future calls for collective action and coordination on an international level, surpassing political and economic boundaries. Additionally, technological advancements could play a role in improving coordination and addressing environmental concerns. However, it is crucial to ensure that technology remains a tool rather than supplanting human agency. Another approach involves re-establishing the connection between the leviathans and the diverse experiences, hopes, and fears of human beings, enabling greater public input and democratic oversight. By reframing the Leviathan era as the Anthropocene, the focus shifts to human responsibility and the potential for collective change to drive positive environmental outcomes.
This week David explores a different way of thinking about the current epoch: what if this isn’t the Anthropocene but the Leviacene? Who or what is really driving planetary destruction? Can human nature explain it? Or should we be looking at the political and economic superpowers that are leaving their marks all over the natural world?
For more on these themes, David’s new book The Handover is available now, including as an audiobook.
Listen to our earlier podcast with historian of science Meehan Crist on Malthus and Malthusianism.