New Books Network

Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, "By the Power Vested in Me: How Experts Shape Same-Sex Marriage Debates" (Columbia UP, 2025)

Jan 30, 2026
A cross-national look at how different kinds of experts shaped debates over same-sex marriage and parenting in the United States and France. Short scenes on battles over empirical research versus theoretical argument. Discussions of who gains credibility, including race, class, institutions, and the strategic use of personal testimony and religious translation.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Expertise Is Socially Constructed

  • Experts shaped same-sex marriage debates differently in the US and France based on which authorities lawmakers trusted.
  • Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer shows expertise is socially constructed, not neutral, and varies by national context.
INSIGHT

Being Heard Is Expert Power

  • Being heard by decision-makers gives experts legitimacy and media reach that shape public views.
  • Expert capital combines cultural norms, resources, and relationships, not just scientific merit.
INSIGHT

Institutions Shape What Counts As Evidence

  • Courts and parliaments prize different evidence: US debates privileged empirical child-outcome studies while France favored theoretical arguments.
  • Institutional settings and availability of domestic data steered which expert claims mattered.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app