Who was responsible for the September Massacres during the French Revolution? The podcast explores the involvement of prominent revolutionaries like Robespierre and Danton, and questions their responsibility. It also discusses the role of the Gerondons, a political faction, in the massacres. The podcast delves into the significance of the September Massacres and their impact on the French Revolution.
01:33:35
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
The September Massacres of 1792 were primarily carried out by Federé volunteers, Parisian National Guardsmen, and radical sun colots, with the involvement of commune officials remaining a contentious topic of debate.
There is no consensus among historians regarding Maximilien Robespierre's level of involvement or responsibility for the September massacres, with some believing that he may have seen the killings as advantageous for his own political agenda.
While Jean-Paul Marat is often attributed with instigating the September massacres through his provocative writings and speeches, there is an ongoing dispute among historians about whether he was unfairly blamed or if the massacres were a result of broader circumstances.
Deep dives
The role of the Commune and the debate over its involvement in the September massacres
The September massacres were a violent and bloody event in Paris where around 1,200 prisoners were killed over a span of four days. The small group of assailants responsible for the killings consisted primarily of Federé volunteers, Parisian National Guardsmen, and members of the city's radical sun colots. The involvement of commune officials in the massacres is debated, with some historians suggesting that while the commune did not initiate the killings, its implicit support may have contributed to their continuation. However, others argue that commune officials were present at the prisons to ensure that only the guilty were put to death and to protect innocent prisoners. The extent of the commune's role and responsibility in these events remains a contentious topic.
The influence of Maximilien Robespierre in the September massacres
Maximilien Robespierre, a prominent figure in the commune and a leading revolutionary, is often associated with the September massacres. However, there is no consensus among historians regarding his level of involvement or responsibility for the killings. While some argue that Robespierre may have seen the murders as advantageous for his own political agenda, others maintain that he was opposed to the violence and disgusted by the bloodshed. The accusations against Robespierre are fueled by his role in attempting to have his political rivals, such as the Gironde and deputies, arrested prior to the massacres. However, the evidence regarding Robespierre's intentions and actions during this period remains inconclusive.
The role of Jean-Paul Marat in inciting the September massacres
Jean-Paul Marat, a radical journalist and member of the commune, is often attributed with instigating and encouraging the September massacres through his provocative writings and speeches. His call to arms for the mass slaughter of prisoners in Paris and his encouragement for other communes to follow suit are seen by many as contributing to the atmosphere that allowed the killings to occur. However, there are also historians who argue that Marat was unfairly blamed for the violence and that the massacres were a result of broader circumstances rather than a deliberate plot instigated by him.
Georges Danton and his role in the September massacres
Georges Danton, as the Minister of Justice, plays a different role in the September massacres compared to Robespierre and Marat. While there are accusations that Danton failed to intervene and stop the killings, some argue that he may not have had the power or ability to do so. Danton's focus on the war effort and the Prussian invasion may have influenced his stance, as preventing the massacres could jeopardize the unity and revolutionary zeal needed to defend the nation. There are also suggestions that his inaction could be attributed to wanting to maintain support from the radical factions in Paris. The motivations and actions of Danton during this period remain ambiguous and subject to debate.
Danton's Controversial Role in the September Massacres
Historians debate whether Danton's speeches leading up to the September Massacres directly instigated the murders. Some argue that his calls for daring and bold measures, along with his statement that objectors should be put to death, created an atmosphere where extreme violence seemed justified. While Danton's words were not as extreme as those of Marat, they were unmistakably violent, and many believe they contributed to the acceptance of popular violence during the revolution.
The Gerondons during the September Massacres
The Gerondon faction, which had a majority in the Legislative Assembly and a presence in the new Executive Council, is criticized for their inaction during the massacres. While they were not involved in plotting the mass killings, historians question if they did enough to stop them. The Legislative Assembly failed to intervene, and specific Gerondons, like Interior Minister Roland, had limited impact in halting the massacres. Furthermore, some Gerondons' initial support or silence during the events raises questions about their later use of the massacres to discredit their political opponents.
Who was to blame for the September Massacres of 1792? Were the deaths planned or spontaneous? How did various individuals, factions, and institutions respond to the killings, and did they seek to use the bloodshed for their own advantage? Before we examine how the massacres changed the revolution, we must understand who is accountable for the carnage in Paris.
Exclusive Bonus Content (Episode Extras)
1.40.1 In Defence of Marat - This episode extra examines the defences of Marat we heard in the main episode. Specifically, it examines Historian Lefebvre's claim that Marat's encouragement of the departments to massacre their own prisoners had no effect. Secondly, it also refutes Historian Hazan's suggestion that Marat should not be held partially accountable for the murders.
The Grey History Community
Help keep Grey History on the air! Every revolution needs its supporters, and we need you! With an ad-free feed, a community discord, a reading club, and tonnes of exclusive bonus content, you're missing out! Do your part for as little as half a cup of coffee per episode! It's the best value on the internet, with the best people too!
Please contact sales@advertisecast.com if you would like to advertise on Grey History: The French Revolution and Napoleon.
All members of the Grey History Community have an ad-free version of the show. Support the show here.
About
Grey History: The French Revolution and Napoleon is a history podcast dedicated to exploring the complexities of our past. By examining both the experiences of contemporaries and the conclusions of historians, the show seeks to unpack the ambiguities and nuances of the past. Understanding the French Revolution and the age of Napoleon is critical to understanding the history of the world, so join us on a journey through a series of events that would be almost unbelievable if it weren't for the fact that it's true! If you're looking for a binge-worthy history podcast on the Revolution and Napoleon Bonaparte, you're in the right place! Enjoy the Revolutions podcast? You'll love this!