

"Generally" We Follow the Law
14 snips May 20, 2025
The podcast dives into the complex legal battles surrounding birthright citizenship, highlighting recent Supreme Court hearings. The discussion examines nationwide injunctions and the implications of political pressure on judicial integrity. Recent rulings on the Alien Enemies Act and protections for Venezuelan migrants raise questions about due process in deportation cases. The speakers address the ethical dilemmas faced by asylum officials and dissect the ongoing challenges within immigration law, stressing the importance of legal protections for vulnerable communities.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Nationwide Injunctions' Importance
- The Supreme Court heard a procedural issue about restricting nationwide injunctions in birthright citizenship cases.
- Denying nationwide injunctions risks inconsistent citizenship rights based on state or plaintiff status.
Justice Kagan on Government Incentives
- Justice Kagan highlighted lack of government incentive to promptly appeal adverse rulings.
- Without nationwide injunctions, many harmed individuals would struggle to vindicate their rights.
Limits of Class Actions as Substitute
- Nationwide injunctions cannot be fully substituted by class actions due to feasibility and procedural challenges.
- Some cases involve indivisible harm making class actions insufficient alternatives.