Main Justice

Protests rage in Minnesota after President Trump's immigration policies spark outrage. The co-hosts discuss the potential invocation of the Insurrection Act and ongoing inquiries into local officials. A judge in Boston stands up for free speech, challenging government actions against noncitizen scholars. The alarming FBI raid on a journalist's home raises serious concerns about press freedoms and the safety of sources. Tune in later this week for insights on a pivotal congressional testimony!

In this discussion, Rebecca Ingber, a law professor and former counselor on international law at the U.S. Department of State, dives into the murky waters of international law regarding U.S. actions in Venezuela, explaining why there's no clear legal justification for the incursion. She emphasizes the implications of the U.N. Charter and the consequences of the operation creating an international armed conflict. The conversation also touches on the limits of congressional war powers and the potential ramifications for U.S. leadership and global stability.

Rachel Maddow invites listeners to explore a premium podcast experience with ad-free content and exclusive bonus episodes. She highlights a variety of MS Now shows featuring prominent contributors, all available for early access. Excitingly, there's a three-month free trial for those who sign up by the end of January. Maddow also reflects on upcoming significant events in 2026, urging fans to stay tuned for more insightful content. The offer combines affordability with an expanded listening experience, making it an enticing opportunity!

Join Winston Pingen, a former Capitol Police officer, who vividly recalls the harrowing violence he faced on January 6, 2021. Brendan Ballew, a former federal prosecutor, discusses the impact of presidential pardons on justice and his resignation in protest. Pamela Hemphill, a convicted participant, reveals her journey of remorse and the reason she declined a pardon. The trio emphasizes the ongoing threat to democracy, the dangers of misinformation, and the necessity of preserving the memory of that day.

In early 2026, the U.S. surprises the world by extracting Venezuelan President Maduro to face charges in New York, igniting debates over legality and international law. The hosts explore how this act echoes past regime-change operations and critiques the administration's law enforcement claims. Mary McCord prepares for her testimony regarding the impact of pardons for January 6th convictions. Meanwhile, they discuss a gripping wrongful prosecution case, highlighting troubling DOJ actions and a scathing review of ICE detention conditions.

In a refreshing twist, the co-hosts delve into significant positive judicial decisions. The Supreme Court's ruling on the federalization of Illinois National Guard troops is a highlight, emphasizing constraints on military involvement in domestic law. They also discuss a landmark ruling regarding due process for Venezuelans deported to El Salvador. Additionally, insights into potential remedies and judicial oversight are shared, especially concerning security-clearance revocations and the implications for legal professionals. It's a message of hope amid a challenging year.

The recent release of the Epstein files raises eyebrows, with heavy redactions and compliance concerns from the Justice Department. The hosts dive into the implications of the Epstein Files Transparency Act and unpack startling revelations from the documents. They also discuss the unsuccessful attempts to add charges against Letitia James and the intriguing split jury verdict in a Wisconsin trial. Additionally, they analyze a significant ruling on the National Guard's role in D.C., highlighting its unique legal status.

The hosts dive into the complexities of political retribution versus legitimate prosecution, highlighting the recent grand jury's refusal to re-indict Letitia James. They explore extraordinary no-bill grand jury rulings and the implications for the DOJ. The discussion shifts to Jack Smith's upcoming deposition, emphasizing the need for transparency. The saga of Kilmar Abrego Garcia unfolds, revealing government errors in deportation. Finally, they analyze the limitations placed on National Guard deployments and the ongoing debates about federal authority.

The Supreme Court's recent ruling on Texas's gerrymandered map sets off a discussion on partisan versus racial gerrymandering. A Virginia grand jury's refusal to re-indict Letitia James raises questions about legal standards and prosecutorial practices. Judge Beryl Howell's landmark decision restricts warrantless immigration arrests, spotlighting Fourth Amendment concerns. The hosts also dive into the Pentagon's IG report on Defense Secretary Hegseth's use of Signal, revealing serious implications for classified communications.

Todd Huntley, a former U.S. Navy judge advocate and director of Georgetown's National Security Law Program, shares his deep insights into the legality of military operations. He discusses a controversial 'kill them all' order linked to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, highlighting how it may violate international law protecting shipwrecked personnel. The conversation dives into the duty to refuse unlawful orders, military reporting obligations, and the repercussions of operational decisions on military trust and accountability.