Discover the intriguing effects of focus of attention in MMA striking. The discussion highlights how external focus enhances performance with the dominant hand but falters with the non-dominant. Research findings from karate athletes showcase the power of different attention strategies. Listeners are taken through an exploration of how these insights can shape training and performance in mixed martial arts. It's a deep dive into the mind-body connection, revealing the nuances of striking precision.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
External focus of attention significantly enhances striking performance in MMA, leading to greater force and speed in punches.
The effectiveness of various focus strategies necessitates reevaluating traditional views on automaticity in motor learning and performance.
Deep dives
Impact of Focus of Attention in MMA Striking
The use of external focus of attention instructions significantly enhances performance in mixed martial arts striking. Studies show that when athletes direct their attention to the target they are striking rather than the mechanics of their movement, they generate greater force and speed in their punches. For example, a 2017 study indicated that boxers instructed to focus on hitting the target performed better than those focusing internally on their arm movements. This suggests that external focus promotes a more automatic mode of execution, which aligns with the constrained action hypothesis that posits internal focus undermines automaticity.
Comparative Effectiveness of Instruction Types
The research compared three types of instructional cues: internal, external, and holistic, revealing that external focus consistently produced better outcomes. While the external focus instructions generated the highest peak impact forces, the holistic cues, aimed at enhancing overall movement quality, did not show a distinct benefit over internal focus. This leads to questions about the effectiveness of holistic cues and whether the specific wording of the cue may influence results. Notably, while external focus worked for both dominant and non-dominant hands, the degree of benefit did not differ significantly, further emphasizing the strength of external instructions.
Rethinking Motor Learning Hypotheses
The findings of this study prompt a reevaluation of the constrained action hypothesis which suggests that internal focus disrupts automaticity during skill performance. Evidence from this research indicates that while external focus improves performance, the effects between dominant and non-dominant hand striking did not align with traditional automaticity expectations. As the ecological approach to motor learning gains traction, the concept of automaticity may be becoming outdated, advocating instead for a model that emphasizes outcome focus. Therefore, the study encourages a shift in understanding how various focus of attention strategies influence skill acquisition and performance.
Do the effects of internal, external and holistic focus of attention instructions different in MMA when striking with the dominaint vs non-dominant hand?