Supreme Court Oral Arguments [22-913] Devillier v. Texas
Devillier v. Texas
Wikipedia · Justia · Docket · oyez.org
Argued on Jan 16, 2024.
Petitioner: Richard Devillier.
Respondent: State of Texas.
Advocates:
- Robert J. McNamara (for the Petitioners)
- Aaron L. Nielson (for the Respondent)
- Edwin S. Kneedler (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting Respondent)
Facts of the case (from oyez.org)
Petitioners Devillier and others own property in Texas along Interstate Highway 10 (IH-10). The State of Texas, through the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT), elevated IH-10 and installed a solid concrete median barrier, which acted as a “weir” to obstruct natural water flow and led to the flooding of the petitioners’ properties. Despite being aware of the potential for flooding, the State proceeded with the construction and even extended the barrier, causing extensive damage to the petitioners’ properties.
The petitioners sued the state, directly invoking the Taking Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which they argued applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court denied Texas’s motion to dismiss, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated, finding the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause as applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment does not provide a right of action for takings claims against the state.
Question
May a party sue a state directly under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment?