In a thought-provoking discussion, conflict mediator Gabrielle Rifkind and ex-army medic Ashleigh Percival-Borley provide unique perspectives on the lessons learned from past wars. Politics scholar David Runciman and peace agreements expert Nina Kasperson delve into the complexities of modern warfare and the concept of democratic peace. They explore the disconnection between society and the realities of conflict, emphasizing the need for funding dialogue over military interventions. The conversation challenges listeners to rethink the meaning of peace in today's geopolitical landscape.
The celebration of VE Day invites reflection on the contrasting narratives of military victory and the necessity for contemporary peacemaking efforts amid ongoing global conflicts.
The historical moral frameworks shaped by World War II often simplify complex realities, impacting present-day understandings of conflicts and complicating peacemaking endeavors.
Sustainable peace requires engaging all parties in conflict, addressing historical grievances, and fostering a dialogue that navigates vast differences for constructive resolution.
Deep dives
The Significance of VE Day Commemorations
The 80th anniversary of VE Day prompted discussions about how this historical event is perceived today. It highlights a contrast between celebrating military victory and the necessity of recognizing ongoing conflicts globally, such as those in Gaza or Kyiv. Perspectives from various guests questioned whether we should glorify past victories or focus on peacemaking efforts for current and future global stability. This discussion significantly reflects the evolving understanding of peace and war, transforming how commemorations are interpreted in contemporary politics.
Evolving Narratives of War
The narrative surrounding World War II continues to shape modern discussions on conflict and peace, creating a moral framework that simplifies complex realities. As different countries celebrate their roles in the war, their narratives often diverge, with the British perspective emphasizing heroism while neglecting the broader complexities involved, such as the Soviet contributions. The simplification of narratives for political ends can also lead to a misunderstanding of current conflicts, contributing to an ambiguous moral clarity that complicates peacemaking efforts. This contradiction necessitates a reevaluation of how we remember wars and the lasting impacts these memories have on present-day conflicts.
The Illusion of Peace Post-War
Following World War II, the concept of peace took on new meaning, often viewed through a Eurocentric lens that overlooks the experiences of countries disrupted by conflict. Although some regions in Western Europe experienced stability, conflicts continued elsewhere, suggesting that peace was more about the absence of direct warfare rather than genuine security. This notion of 'negative peace' indicates the challenges in recognizing underlying tensions that still exist globally. Acknowledging these complexities could lead to a more comprehensive understanding of peace that encompasses both historical perspectives and present realities.
Challenges in Modern Warfare
Modern conflict has become increasingly complex, with the lines blurred between state and non-state actors and the rise of asymmetric warfare. The discussions highlighted the need for a shift in military preparedness, focusing on understanding diverse actors and the fragmented nature of contemporary battles. The British Army's future doctrine illustrates the complications of modern warfare, where ethical constraints, connectivity, and multifaceted targets demand innovative approaches. This complexity requires a corresponding evolution in our understanding of peace and conflict resolution, recognizing that achieving stability will be just as intricate.
Navigating the Path to Peace
Creating sustainable peace necessitates engaging all conflict parties and recognizing their historical and emotional contexts. Mediators play a vital role in preparation, helping conflicting parties navigate their grievances and seek compromises, rather than resorting to simplistic divisions of good and evil. The emphasis on developing a universal language for conflict resolution can facilitate dialogue and promote coexistence among stark differences. Addressing these historical grievances while striving for constructive engagement may offer viable paths toward lasting peace amidst the complexities of global politics.
On the 8th May 1945, the Allies declared victory over Nazi Germany. How has war and the threat of war shaped society in the intervening years? Do 'war' and 'peace' mean the same things, 80 years on?
Matthew Sweet is joined by political scientist David Runciman, peace negotiator Gabrielle Rifkind, historian Ashleigh Percival-Borley
Producer: Luke Mulhall
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
