Responding To Contemporary Atheism | Fr. James Brent, O.P.
Jun 2, 2024
auto_awesome
Fr. James Brent, O.P., discusses Ur-Platonism and Big Tent Platonism as frameworks to counter contemporary atheism. He challenges prevailing beliefs, explores rationality through different perspectives, and emphasizes the principle of non-contradiction in unveiling absolute truth.
Confronting contemporary atheism entails grappling with complex philosophical concepts beyond mere propositions.
Big Tent Platonism emphasizes the rejection of pure materialism, existence of forms, and universal truths.
Deep dives
Contending with Contemporary Atheism
Addressing contemporary atheism is not just about debating the existence of God, but navigating a profound philosophical matrix embedded in atheism. Contemporary atheism challenges fundamental philosophical beliefs and encompasses a broader worldview. Confronting atheism means engaging with complex philosophical concepts beyond mere propositions.
Unveiling Big Tent Platonism
Big Tent Platonism, as proposed by Lloyd Gerson, emphasizes five negative positions that define its scope. These include anti-materialism, anti-mechanism, anti-nominalism, anti-relativism, and anti-skepticism. Big Tent Platonism asserts the existence of forms, the rejection of pure materialism, and the presence of universal truths.
The Rational Animal's Reasoning
Different conceptions of rationality, including Augustinian Thomistic, Enlightenment, and genealogical, shape our understanding of reason and truth. The Augustinian Thomistic approach sees reason as developmental and requires trust in a tradition of inquiry. The Enlightenment view seeks a neutral, presuppositionless perspective, while the genealogical perspective critiques reason as a tool for the will to power.
Challenging Philosophical Paradigms
Philosophical dialogues often involve conflicting paradigms, such as the perennial philosophy versus genealogical perspectives. By appealing to core philosophical truths, like the principle of non-contradiction, resistance to absolute truth can be confronted. Demonstrating coherence in philosophical reasoning can lead individuals away from dark skepticism towards recognizing universal truths.