Law professor Steve Vladeck discusses SCOTUS decisions, presidential power limits, Julian Assange's legal situation, major cases in the current Supreme Court term, challenges to precedents in federal courts, and the significance of the Ten Commandments display in Louisiana schools.
The Supreme Court validated federal bans on gun possession for those under restraining orders, emphasizing public safety.
Justice Clarence Thomas' dissent in the Rahimi case showcased a divergence from the majority's pragmatic and real-world interpretation of gun control.
The podcast highlighted the balance between legal doctrine and practical implications in Supreme Court rulings, emphasizing a move towards common law judging.
Deep dives
Rahimi Case and Second Amendment Interpretation
The podcast covers the case of Zachary Rahimi, who was convicted of possessing a firearm while under a domestic violence-related restraining order. This case highlighted the shift in the Supreme Court's approach to Second Amendment cases following the Bruin decision. Lower courts applied a new standard requiring historical analogs to justify gun control regulations. The Supreme Court, with an 8-1 majority, validated the federal ban on gun possession for those under restraining orders, emphasizing the inherent danger and the need for legal restriction.
Clarence Thomas' Dissent in Rahimi Case
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented in the Rahimi case, reflecting his originalist perspective outlined in the Bruin decision. Thomas emphasized the need for historical evidence to support gun control measures, aligning with his prior views. The dissent stood out, as the majority opinion, including Justices from previous Second Amendment cases, did not support Thomas' strict originalist interpretation. The divergent opinions in Rahimi showcased a possible shift in judicial perspectives from the originalist doctrine.
Considerations Beyond Originalism in Supreme Court Decisions
The podcast delves into the broader implications of Supreme Court decisions beyond strict adherence to originalist principles. It questions the practicality and common sense aspects in judging cases, such as gun possession limitations based on restraining orders. Justices, including Justice Barrett, demonstrated a real-world perspective in the Rahimi ruling, acknowledging the need for pragmatic legal interpretations. The move towards common law judging in critical cases like Rahimi indicates a balance between legal doctrine and real-world implications.
Court Cases and Due Process Concerns
The discussion in the podcast delves into court cases involving gun possession and the importance of due process. The conversation highlights the significance of proper legal adjudication in cases such as restraining orders and felon possession scenarios. It examines the complexities of cases like Hunter Biden's firearm possession situation, emphasizing the need for due process, especially in disarming individuals based on limited processes. The podcast explores how different Justices, like Gorsuch, express concerns over due process implications when restricting someone's rights without concrete legal adjudication.
Impact of Judicial Decisions and Originalism
The podcast touches on the impact of judicial decisions and the evolution of originalism as a constitutional interpretation methodology. It reflects on the doctrinal shifts in originalism over the years, questioning its objectivity and consistency. The conversation underscores the tension between different models of judicial interpretation, such as the dispute resolution and law declaration models. It raises concerns about the Supreme Court's approach in balancing narrow and broad decisions, highlighting the challenges in maintaining consistency and addressing complex legal issues effectively.
Steve Vladeck is a law professor at the University of Texas School of Law and a leading expert on constitutional law and federal courts. He joins Preet to analyze the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Rahimi, emerging jurisprudential trends, and the future of its conservative wing. They also discuss the new Louisiana law requiring public schools to display the Ten Commandments in their classrooms.
Plus, what are dicta? Can the President alone reform the Supreme Court? And what’s going on with Julian Assange?
Have a question for Preet? Ask @PreetBharara on Threads, or Twitter with the hashtag #AskPreet. Email us at staytuned@cafe.com, or call 669-247-7338 to leave a voicemail.
Stay Tuned with Preet is brought to you by CAFE and the Vox Media Podcast Network.
