Stay Tuned with Preet

Cecillia Wang, National Legal Director of the ACLU, dives into the organization's lawsuit against Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act to target Venezuelan immigrants. She discusses the significant legal battles surrounding birthright citizenship and temporary protective status for Venezuelans. Cecillia emphasizes the critical role of habeas corpus in immigration cases, the judiciary's struggle with executive overreach, and the need for accountability in government actions. Her insights shed light on the vital intersection of law and human rights during tumultuous times.

In this engaging discussion, Lina Khan, the youngest-ever chair of the Federal Trade Commission, delves into the critical implications of monopolies on market innovation and consumer welfare. She highlights the surprising bipartisan support for antitrust measures and reflects on her swift rise to prominence after her groundbreaking work on Amazon. The conversation covers the complexities of market dominance and the urgent need for active antitrust enforcement, emphasizing how monopolistic behavior stifles competition.

A recent Supreme Court ruling has halted the Trump administration's swift deportation efforts under the Alien Enemies Act, raising important due process questions. The discussion delves into a nationwide injunction related to ending birthright citizenship and an investigation into former FBI Director James Comey for a social media post. Additionally, the podcast critiques the expansion of executive power during the Trump era and emphasizes the vital role of due process in immigration, highlighting its necessity for safeguarding individual rights.

Historians Heather Cox Richardson and Joanne Freeman delve into how a lack of historical understanding can skew political messaging. They discuss Trump's misinterpretation of the Declaration of Independence and its implications for civic engagement and governance. With humor, they address the manipulation of history in political discourse and the challenges of ensuring constitutional adherence. Additionally, they touch on the evolution of political violence and the ethics of AI in the courtroom. Their insights spark crucial reflections on American identity.

Rachel Barkow, a prominent professor at NYU Law School and former U.S. Sentencing Commission member, dives into the alarming conversation around the potential suspension of habeas corpus, spotlighting comments from Trump advisor Stephen Miller. She emphasizes Congress's crucial role in safeguarding constitutional rights against executive overreach. The discussion also touches on the implications of political language surrounding habeas corpus and historical precedents for its limitation, all while reflecting on the legacy of Supreme Court Justice David Souter.

This audio essay dives into an exciting transition to Substack, aimed at enhancing audience interaction. It teases upcoming live discussions with experts, inviting listeners to engage in fresh, meaningful dialogues. The host emphasizes the need for thoughtful conversations amidst today's polarized climate, encouraging active participation in critical discussions. It's a call to connect in new and enriching ways!

Leah Litman, a constitutional law professor at the University of Michigan and co-host of Strict Scrutiny, dives into the Supreme Court’s conservative leanings and its embrace of fringe legal theories. She critiques how these ideologies shape landmark decisions and discusses the implications of unenumerated rights and the unitary executive theory. The conversation also touches on upcoming Supreme Court cases that could reshape the Voting Rights Act and influence education, all while infusing humor into the serious topic of judicial defiance.

Join Trevor Morrison, Dean Emeritus of NYU Law School and expert in constitutional law, as he discusses the limits of executive power. Trevor and Preet delve into the Trump administration's resistance to court orders regarding wrongful deportations. They explore a judge's decision against an executive order targeting a law firm, and a ruling deeming the use of the Alien Enemies Act for deportations as unlawful. This conversation emphasizes the ongoing battle between judicial authority and presidential overreach.

Michael Roth, President of Wesleyan University since 2007 and a leading voice in higher education debates, dives deep into the challenges universities face amid political attacks. He discusses the ideological biases in academia and the pressing need for diverse perspectives. Roth also explores how university leaders can maintain neutrality while engaging with controversial issues. Plus, he reflects on elitism in admissions and the importance of fostering democratic values in education. It's a thought-provoking conversation on the future of academia.

A Wisconsin judge is in hot water for allegedly helping someone avoid ICE agents in her courthouse. Legal experts discuss the implications of this controversial case on immigration enforcement. The podcast also tackles the ongoing tensions between federal agents and state court defendants. With a former judge facing similar charges in New Mexico, the conversation deepens around the judicial system’s integrity. Lastly, tensions escalate as courtroom disruptions threaten the balance between judicial authority and federal law enforcement.