The Nathan Jacobs Podcast That Trinity Analogy is Heresy | Nicene Trinitarianism Explained
Jan 15, 2026
Dive into the fascinating world of Nicene Trinitarianism as Dr. Jacobs explores the metaphysical foundations set by the Cappadocian Fathers. He demystifies complex Greek terms like ousia and hypostasis while contrasting Eastern and Western theological developments. Discover the historic debates over divine nature with the Arian dispute and Augustine's significant influence. Jacobs also tackles modern misunderstandings of the Trinity and considers prospects for East-West reconciliation amidst deep philosophical divides.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Analogies Can Be True Or False
- Trinitarian statements are analogical but can be true or false; not all analogies are meaningless.
- Dr. Nathan Jacobs argues Christian tradition treats analogical language as truth-apt and subject to verification.
Classroom Analogies Often Mirror Heresies
- Students often offer H2O, egg, or role-based analogies for the Trinity, yet Jacobs notes each maps to historic heresies.
- He recounts using those analogies in class to show common but flawed understandings and then labels them ancient heresies.
Hypostasis Vs Ousia Distinction
- The Cappadocian formula is three hypostases (subjects) sharing one ousia (common nature).
- Gregory of Nyssa used human examples (Paul, Timothy, Silvanus) to show persons share a single nature without being three gods.
