Can Celeb Support Sign, Seal, Deliver Election Results?
Aug 22, 2024
auto_awesome
Marianna, a commentator on celebrity political endorsements, joins John Burn-Murdoch, the chief data reporter at the Financial Times. They dive into the impact of celebrity endorsements on voter behavior, analyzing how figures like Oprah and Taylor Swift engage the public. The discussion contrasts American and British political strategies while exploring the delicate balance of authenticity in endorsements. They also touch on the recent breakthrough drug for Alzheimer’s, its implications for families, and the ongoing conversations on health care accessibility.
Celebrity endorsements, like those from Oprah, can significantly boost voter turnout but may alienate some audiences who oppose such involvement.
The Democratic campaign's strategy of promoting joy and positivity aims to create an emotional connection with voters, contrasting traditional political messaging.
Deep dives
Celebrity Influence on Politics
The impact of celebrity endorsements in American politics is significant, especially for the Democratic Party, which often garners more support from high-profile figures. Celebrities like Oprah Winfrey and John Legend participated in major events, underscoring their influence and ability to inspire voter turnout. For example, Oprah's past endorsement of Barack Obama is estimated to have garnered him around a million extra votes, illustrating the potential weight of such public endorsements. However, while these endorsements can energize certain voting blocs, they may alienate others who disapprove of celebrity involvement in politics.
The Strategy of Campaign Joy
The Democratic campaign has increasingly emphasized themes of joy and positivity as a central electoral strategy. This approach differs from traditional focuses on economic stability or political challenges, framing the campaign as a movement centered on uplifting emotions and a hopeful vision. This choice of messaging appears particularly effective in rallying support during conventions, as evidenced by the positive reception of light-hearted moments and celebrity interactions. Ultimately, this strategy seeks to create a strong emotional connection with potential voters as a means of increasing turnout.
Impact of Taylor Swift's Possible Endorsement
Taylor Swift's potential endorsement of a political candidate has raised discussions about the ramifications for voter engagement and turnout. Despite maintaining an apolitical persona, she has shown willingness to support Democratic values, especially concerning rights issues. Historically, her involvement in political discourse has sparked speculation about its possible effects on young and independent voters. Should Swift endorse a candidate like Kamala Harris, it could mobilize her fanbase, but some analysis suggests the overall impact might be minimal if already polarized audiences are less receptive to celebrity endorsements.
Alzheimer's Drug Developments
A recent breakthrough in Alzheimer’s research involves the drug Lecanumab, which has shown potential in slowing the progression of early-stage Alzheimer’s. While it presents a modest benefit, the drug targets underlying amyloid plaques in the brain and marks a significant advancement in treatment. However, its approval comes with cautions regarding side effects and accessibility concerns, especially through the UK's health services. The ongoing conversation around Lecanumab highlights the complexities in balancing innovative treatments with practical implementation and patient safety.
Today we look at celebrity political endorsements, and whether they make a difference at the polls.
At the Democratic National Convention last night, Hollywood stars took to the stage to endorse Kamala Harris for President, but will their support actually change the results of the election?
Adam’s joined by Marianna and John Burn-Murdoch, chief data reporter at the Financial Times.
And, the first drug to slow the progression of Alzheimer’s will not be available on the NHS in England, with health assessment body NICE saying the benefits “are too small to justify the costs”.
Adam discusses the decision with medical editor Fergus Walsh.
You can join our Newscast online community here: https://tinyurl.com/newscastcommunityhere
Today's Newscast was presented by Adam Fleming. It was made by Chris Flynn with Joe Wilkinson and Sam McLaren. The technical producers were Mike Regaard and Ricardo McCarthy. The assistant editor is Chris Gray. The editor is Sam Bonham.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode