Jason Henrichs, CEO of Alloy Labs and host of Breaking Banks, dives into the complexities of fintech regulation and accountability. He explores the idea that banks should view consent orders as opportunities, not hurdles. The conversation raises questions about the personal responsibility of entrepreneurs and investors when ventures fail, highlighting the need for robust compliance. They tackle the contrasts between resilience and hubris among entrepreneurs, stressing the importance of adapting to regulatory challenges for a healthier financial ecosystem.
BaaS has democratized access to financial services, but regulatory pressures are forcing fintech startups to reassess their viability and partnerships.
Accountability is crucial in fintech, as investors and board members must face consequences for compliance failures to ensure responsible practices.
Embracing insights from failed entrepreneurs can foster innovation and resilience, shifting the industry's focus from mere success to valuable lessons learned.
Deep dives
The Importance of Banking as a Service
Banking as a Service (BaaS) is recognized as a crucial component of fintech, providing access to financial services for previously underserved populations. However, while it has opened doors, a significant influx of venture capital and an influx of entrants into the market have created challenges. Many fintech companies that rushed in lacked a robust understanding of the banking landscape, leading to what is described as 'FinTech tourism.' This situation has resulted in a pressing issue where startups may need to divest from their BaaS programs due to regulatory pressure, potentially leaving consumers without vital services.
Consumer Impact of Regulatory Changes
Recent regulatory changes have resulted in banks enforcing stricter requirements on fintech programs they partner with, which has led to offboarding practices affecting many consumer accounts. A pertinent example is Mercury, a B2B Neobank, which has begun to offboard customers based on geographic risk. This raises concerns about where these customers—especially those previously relying on these services—will turn for banking needs. Many consumers may feel unjustly impacted by the evolving standards that fintechs and banks face as they navigate complex compliance landscapes.
The Need for Greater Regulatory Accountability
A call for greater accountability among fintech entrepreneurs and their investors is emphasized, highlighting that many in the industry underestimate the complexities of financial services. In particular, the podcast discusses the need for a shift in culture where accountability is not just an expectation but a reality, particularly for those who fail to adhere to regulatory standards. The argument is that if investors and board members face personal consequences for missteps, it would promote a more responsible approach to decisions made within fintech. This attitude could significantly reshape the industry's approach to growth and compliance.
Rethinking VC Success Metrics
The predictability of success based solely on previous entrepreneurial success is critiqued, emphasizing the importance of learning from failures. There is a notion that having previously successful founders on boards limits perspectives and risks missing important lessons from failure. Acknowledging the role of 'failed' entrepreneurs as advisors can provide a more balanced and realistic approach to navigating fintech challenges. Emphasizing the necessity for founders to be adaptable and aware of industry changes fosters a more innovative and pragmatic ecosystem.
The Path Forward for Regulators
To improve the current regulatory framework and restore trust in the fintech industry, regulators must adopt a more nuanced and engaged approach. Recognizing that fintech provides value to consumers and the broader banking ecosystem can shift perspectives on regulation. It’s essential for regulators to distinguish between good and bad actors, providing support to responsible innovators while holding any negligent parties accountable. A shift towards a collaborative environment can enable better solutions and create a more resilient landscape for the future of banking.
Jason Henrichs (CEO of Alloy Labs and host of the Breaking Banks podcast) certainly can, and he’s pointing the finger at, well, everyone. He and Alex have a laundry list of juicy questions for bankers, regulators, entrepreneurs, and investors. And even if they are unanswerable, the guys are doing their best to answer them.
Is there a right way to regulate fintech? And are banks looking at things from the wrong perspective? Instead of cutting corners to scale, what would happen if banks started viewing consent orders as productive stepping stones rather than stumbling blocks?
Jason and Alex also debate whether entrepreneurs and investors should be held personally accountable when things go awry. With so many board members acting as if compliance is a mere matter of semantics, shouldn’t they also bear some culpability when things fall apart? It’s clear that the move-fast-and-break-things approach doesn’t work when people’s livelihoods are at stake— so why aren’t the people pulling the strings being held accountable when consumer protections fall by the wayside?
Plus, the guys discuss whether failed or less successful entrepreneurs might be the ultimate solution against high-risk, high-momentum venture capitalists and ponder if regulators can ever get out of the corner they’ve been backed into.
Sign up for Alex’s Fintech Takes newsletter for the latest insightful analysis on fintech trends, along with a heaping pile of pop culture references and copious footnotes. Every Monday and Thursday: https://workweek.com/brand/fintech-takes/
And for more exclusive insider content, don’t forget to check out my YouTube page.
