AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
This podcast episode explores the difference between relative and absolute truth. It emphasizes the importance of understanding this distinction, as it can lead to traps and conflations when not properly recognized. The episode aims to open the listener's mind to the possibility of accessing and recognizing absolute truth, challenging the prevailing narratives of relativism and materialism. It clarifies that relative truth is based on comparisons and divisions of reality, while absolute truth exists singularly and cannot be validated through external sources. The episode encourages listeners to consider the existence and personal access to absolute truth, highlighting that they can directly recognize its existence without any medium or process.
The episode references previous episodes that explore relativism, truth, and the discovery of reality to address common questions and challenges people have about accessing absolute truth. It acknowledges the influence of cultural narratives emphasizing relativism and materialism, which often lead to a closed mindset regarding absolute truth. The speaker encourages the listener to honestly reflect on their beliefs about the existence and accessibility of absolute truth, highlighting that the majority of people tend to believe it doesn't exist or cannot be accessed. The episode emphasizes the need to open one's mind to the possibility of absolute truth, which challenges popular beliefs and narratives.
The episode delves into the nature of relative and absolute truth, using examples such as the color of the sky and the concept of velocity to illustrate the relativity of truth. It explains that relative truths are dependent on context, perspectives, and comparisons, and can vary based on different factors. In contrast, absolute truth exists independently and does not rely on comparisons or divisions of reality. The episode highlights that absolute truth cannot be defined or validated through external means, as it is singular and sovereign. It emphasizes that the absolute truth is experienced directly, without any medium or process of validation.
The episode explores the paradox and potential self-deception associated with absolute truth. It challenges the skepticism and doubt often raised when considering the existence and recognition of absolute truth. It emphasizes that doubting and questioning absolute truth is itself a form of self-deception, as doubt operates within the relative domain and cannot grasp the nature of absolute truth. The speaker urges listeners to consider the possibility of transcending the relative domain and entering the non-dual absolute domain to directly experience absolute truth, highlighting that direct experience is the only validation one needs in recognizing and accessing the absolute truth.
The podcast explores the idea that what we consider reality is a consensus reality generated through culture and external validation. The speaker emphasizes that detaching from these anchors and hooks to embrace our absolute sovereignty and validate our own truth is essential, even though it can be terrifying. The fear of taking back our full authority and embracing our imagination as absolute truth prevents us from reaching enlightenment. The chief delusion is giving away our authority to others and relying on external validation instead of embracing our own consciousness.
The podcast explains the paradox between absolute truth and relative truth. Absolute truth is the actual building blocks of existence, while relative truth is the concepts and ideas we use to understand and communicate about reality. The speaker uses analogies like Lego blocks and fictional universes to illustrate the relationship between the two. The distinction is vital in understanding that while absolute truth encompasses everything and can't be spoken or thought of without paradox, relative truth is a practical way to navigate the human experience.
The podcast highlights the dangers of misconstruing the absolute and relativistic perspectives. It cautions against dismissing the relative domain too quickly when communicating with others who are not yet at the absolute perspective. Additionally, the speaker warns against using absolute truth to justify survival activities or ego-driven desires. Acknowledging the importance of relative truth, even though it's not absolutely true, is crucial for navigating and understanding the human experience.
The absolute and the relative are not polar opposites but deeply intertwined aspects of one unified reality. Absolute truth cannot be spoken, only spoken about. Spiritual speech is not the absolute itself, but it can point to the absolute. It is important to be clear about whether one is speaking about the absolute or the relative to avoid the conflation of the two.
Conflating the relative and the absolute leads to misunderstandings and errors. Statements like 'we are all one' or 'the brain does not exist' are relative truths that point to the absolute, but they should not be misconstrued as absolute truths. The conflation of the relative and the absolute can lead to inappropriate behavior, distorted interpretations, and the misuse of spiritual teachings.
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode