Thinking Fellows Can Christians Use Lethal Force
Jan 20, 2026
The hosts tackle the complex ethics of self-defense through a Christian lens, debating if deadly force can be morally justified. They explore the distinction between instinctive responses and thoughtful ethical decisions during life-threatening situations. Biblical ambiguity on violence raises tough questions about scriptural interpretation and societal duties. Personal stories, like an active-shooter incident, illustrate real-world implications. Ultimately, they emphasize Christ's forgiveness amidst moral dilemmas, grounding their discussions in faith and vocation.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Self‑Defense Is Theologically Complex
- The podcast frames deadly self-defense as a complex moral question within Christian vocation and witness.
- The hosts agree scripture gives guidance but leaves many modern scenarios ambiguous.
Use Double Effect To Weigh Harm
- Aquinas' principle of double effect can justify harming an aggressor to save more innocents.
- Apply moral weighings: choose the action that prevents greater harm when necessary.
IHOP Shooting: Instinct To Protect Family
- Adam recounts seeing people flee an IHOP during an active shooter and concealed carriers returning fire.
- His primary instinct was to protect his son, not to worry about his Christian witness in that moment.
