Abbie VanSickle, a Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times, delves into a critical Supreme Court case regarding homelessness. She discusses the surge in homeless encampments and how cities are responding with bans on public camping. The conversation highlights the legal complexities stemming from challenges against such laws, emphasizing the constitutional implications and the urgent need for clarity. VanSickle also points out the unusual bipartisan agreement on tackling homelessness, reflecting deepening tensions and the search for viable solutions.
Cities face legal challenges in regulating homelessness amidst rising numbers of homeless encampments.
The Supreme Court's ruling on Grants Pass case may impact how states address the homelessness crisis in the West.
Deep dives
The Grants Pass Case: Understanding the Legal Battle
The Grants Pass case highlights a legal battle in Oregon where homeless individuals challenged the city's laws prohibiting sleeping and camping in public spaces. This case reflects the growing tension between cities and the homeless population, especially in Western states. It questions the extent to which cities can regulate homelessness and whether it can be considered illegal to be homeless.
Impact of the Boise Precedent on Homelessness Policies
The Boise case set a precedent stating that cities could not criminalize homelessness if there was an insufficient number of shelter beds available. This ruling influenced homelessness policies across the Western U.S., affecting cases like Grants Pass. It raised concerns about the constitutional rights of involuntarily homeless individuals and the limitations placed on city ordinances.
Debating Solutions to Homelessness: Policy vs. Root Causes
The Supreme Court's decision on the Grants Pass case is expected to have implications for the visibility and management of homelessness. While the legal battle focuses on policing homelessness, it also reveals deeper issues surrounding the root causes of homelessness. The case prompts discussions on the need for adequate shelter space, treatment for mental health issues, and broader solutions beyond policing and enforcement measures.
Debates over homeless encampments in the United States have intensified as their number has surged. To tackle the problem, some cities have enforced bans on public camping.
As the Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments about whether such actions are legal, Abbie VanSickle, who covers the court for The Times, discusses the case and its far-reaching implications.
Guest: Abbie VanSickle, a Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode